That's what two members of Lord Lawson's climate
change science denying Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF) did when they bet Chris Hope, a Cambridge University researcher, that 2015 wouldn't be the hottest year ever recorded.
Republican donor David Herro is standing by Lord Lawson's UK climate
change science denying charity — which he helped to fund — amidst allegations that its peer review process is flawed.
Resolution in Opposition to a Carbon Tax: Despite support for a carbon tax from ALEC members like ExxonMobil, ALEC is creating a model bill to weigh in on what will become the keystone policy battle for climate
change science deniers, a battle that is already creating a rift among conservative groups, like the Koch - funded Heritage Foundation and the Heartland Institute against the R Street Institute.
Heartland has long been associated with the small core of professional climate
change science deniers.
Either you are one of the most sophisticated trolls I have ever encountered on Disqus, or I owe you thanks for so eloquently deconstructing the points made by your fellow climate
change science deniers.
Pruitt also has staffed the EPA with a litany of climate
change science deniers, drawing particularly heavily from the office of Sen. Jim Inhofe (R - OK)-- who famously threw a snowball on the Senate floor to prove that climate change is a hoax — to fill senior leadership positions.
SPPI was founded in mid-2007 with a strong focus on global warming skepticism, and draws heavily on papers published by climate
change science denier Christopher Monckton who was the editor of the SPPI's «Monthly CO2 Report,» (last published in January of 2011) has had many of his papers published with SPPI, and is also listed as the group's «Chief Policy Advisor.»
And of course with any major public event on climate change, the same small and very vocal group of climate
change science deniers and conspiracy theorists are trying to distort the message, and (of all things) discredit Pope Francis and his concern about climate change.
Not exact matches
The commander - in - chief posted on Twitter, «
Science fair nightmare: This #climate
change denier is the world's most embarrassing dad» and included a link that was expected to go to his website.
They've posted multiple videos of the «Friends of
Science,» another climate
change denying group.
The irony continues with the feting of Okotoks as the greenest community in Canada by such pundits as Prime Minister Stephen Harper and CBC's Peter Mansbridge at the same time the «rurban» community sits in the chosen provincial riding of Wildrose leader Danielle Smith — a right wing student of the climate -
change -
denying Fraser Institute and cheerful avower that global warming
science is «not settled.»
Ok we cant
deny it anymore the church said, so lets say GOD created evolution but we will not calll it evolution because thats just is admitting that
science was right, lets call it Smart design, and so creationism was born, its no surprise that any great discovery gets hijacked and twisted and
changed to fit with the religious when so long before proven it gets
denied by the same people.
I'm not
changing a single thing the bible says, nor am I
denying the evidence of
science.
No. 7: Cuomo says he is waiting for the
science to decide about fracking, just like the climate
change deniers.
Journalist Naomi Klein (of No Logo and The Shock Doctrine fame) doesn't pull any punches as she examines climate
change, its
science, the
deniers and all those with vested interests.
This is not to
deny that at a time when there has been dramatic progress in nuclear
science and technology, some questions require periodic re-examination; the criteria by which judgments on energy policy should be made are constantly
changing.
Apparently determined to portray scientific conclusions as liberal bias, even declaring climate
change a Chinese conspiracy, he has tapped climate
science deniers for roles intended to protect the environment.
So he sexes up his narrative by presenting it as a battle between the «short, professorial looking» Emanuel, a «nuanced and sophisticated» man who talks in complete sentences, and the obdurate William Gray of Colorado State University, «a towering figure of American hurricane
science,» who has for many years produced remarkably accurate forecasts of the upcoming Atlantic hurricane season and who repeatedly and loudly
denies — in congressional hearings and everywhere else — that humans have any role in climate
change.
During a historic European heat wave, 36 Nobel laureates signed a declaration on climate
change — and tried to shout down the
science -
denying claims of one of their own
She says Pres. Donald Trump's administration is carrying out a «war on
science» with proposed cuts in scientific research funding and appointments of climate
change deniers to top positions.
Doubting or rejecting the
science on climate
change no longer makes someone a «skeptic» or «
denier» in the views of a leading news organization.
Two more Republicans who have publically
denied the role of human activity in climate
change — Senators Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio — have assumed leadership of two influential subcommittees of the Senate commerce,
science and transportation committee.
Administrator Scott Pruitt
denies the link between carbon dioxide and climate
change, and has called for military - style Red - team - Blue - team debates of climate
science.
Read all about climate denial scientist Willie Soon's dirty money from petrochemical billionaire Charles Koch, coal utility Southern Company, oil giant ExxonMobil and other fossil fuel companies to
deny the
science of climate
change!
And it's very clear that the Koch Brothers, the largest privately held fossil fuel interest and major funders of the public relations campaign to
deny and attack the
science of climate
change — they have a level of influence now within the Trump Administration unlike anything we've ever seen before.»
We show how the tactics of the tobacco industry's campaign for «sound
science» led to the formation of front groups who, as they lost the battle to
deny smoking's health hazards and keep warning labels off of cigarettes, turned their argumentative skills to the denial of climate
change science in order to slow government action.
Following the leak of internal Heartland Institute documents, six universities with faculty listed in Heartland's budget for work relating to
denying the
science or implications of global climate
change received letters from Greenpeace asking for conflict of interest investigations (see the Chronicle of Higher Education's coverage).
If state standards are up to par with national
science standards, writing a curriculum that
denied climate
change would be tough, said Julie Lambert, an associate professor of
science education at Florida Atlantic University.
Malcolm Turnbull, fully understanding the
science fought for the ETS, In 2009 the climate
deniers in the coalition proudly declared their own ignorance, Turnbull was ousted because of his commitment to the
science and «Climate
change is crap» Tony Abbott became the Leader, Greg Hunt (current opposition climate
change minister) like Turnbull also understands the
science, both now tethered purely for short term political gain
that looks bad, the alarmists refuse public debate... that looks bad, the alarmists predictions are routinely failures... that looks bad, the alarmists use their influence to
deny publication of contrary
science... that looks bad, the alarmists do whatever they can to destroy the careers of scientists that research alternate explanations for climatic temp
changes..
It's going to be a long, hot summer whether you
deny the
science of climate
change or not.
The climate
science also sure is subject to severe political pressures from varying lobbyist groups, first and foremost the oil an coal interests which are huge financial powerhouses especially in the US Senate — a body which in reality dictates the whole global «climate policy» or rather the absence of any such — serious climate politicans round the globe in reality have — as we now have seen — no chance at all against the
denying forces and their huge media apparatus, as long as the public don't see some very serious consequences of climate
change, fx.
Ray Ladbury @ 50 says: «Jim Steele, Titus has a long record of
denying the
science of climate
change — as do you»
Daisyworld's WunderBlog — However, what really opened my eyes with this article was the concept of «Manufactured Doubt» campaigns, and why corporations and industries (and consequently, politicians and individuals who listen to them) continue to
deny the
science behind human - induced climate
change.
February 15, 2015 —
Science deniers try to
change the facts about climate http://blog.hotwhopper.com/2015/02/
science-
deniers-try-to-
change-facts.html
In the talk, Victor, trained in political
science, warns against focusing too much on trying to defeat those
denying the widespread view that greenhouse - driven climate
change is a clear and present danger, first explaining that there are many kind of people engaged at that end of the global warming debate — including camps he calls «shills» (the professional policy delayers), «skeptics» (think Freeman Dyson) and «hobbyists.»
Sometimes it's easy to get the impression that public opinion on climate
change is split down the middle, with concerned advocates for climate action on one side and
science -
denying conspiracy theorists on the other.
The» top ten» arguments employed by the relatively few
deniers with credentials in any aspect of climate -
change science (which arguments include «the sun is doing it», «Earth's climate was
changing before there were people here», «climate is
changing on Mars but there are no SUVs there», «the Earth hasn't been warming since 1998», «thermometer records showing heating are contaminated by the urban - heat - island effect», «satellite measurements show cooling rather than warming») have all been shown in the serious scientific literature to be wrong or irrelevant, but explaining their defects requires at least a paragraph or two for each one.
However, it does a fine job of revealing how attitudes about climate
change are influenced and manipulated within the power structure, of debunking the
deniers» tired arguments, and showing that the anti-climate crusade is driven by ideology and oil cash, not
science.
Excerpts from the report, «Investigative Summary Regarding Allegations that NASA Suppressed Climate
Change Science and
Denied Media Access to Dr. James E. Hansen, a NASA Scientist»:
1) We climate realists
deny no
science, you peddlers of CatastrophicAGW - by - CO2 are the real
deniers, of the
science and empirical data which shows natural climate
change.
Bill Nye, The
Science Guy, OK w / Jailing Climate
Change Deniers.
``... are the real
deniers, of the
science and empirical data which shows natural climate
change.»
Bill Nye, «The
Science Guy,» OK with Jailing Climate
Change Deniers - legal Insurrection (blog) https://t.co/NgiPQvmkwx
RT @JoeFreedomLove: Bill Nye, «The
Science Guy,» OK with Jailing Climate
Change Deniers https://t.co/gzQGHmt13Z via @sharethis
Bill Nye, The
Science Guy, OK with Jailing Climate
Change Deniers https://t.co/no6BZ0ktNZ #ff #tcot #climatechange
RT @fuzislippers: Bill Nye, «The
Science Guy,» OK with Jailing Climate
Change Deniers https://t.co/ZN0IPckh90 / Where are the leftists scree...
But utilities like Southern Company, the parent company of Gulf Power, have wasted precious time by
denying the
science on climate
change.
Bill Nye, «The
Science Guy,» OK with Jailing Climate
Change Deniers: Sarah Palin: «Bill Nye is as much a scie... https://t.co/O54TGLSFDx
Bill Nye, «The
Science Guy,» OK with Jailing Climate
Change Deniers https://t.co/ZN0IPckh90 / Where are the leftists screeching «FASCIST!»?