Sentences with phrase «change science people»

Not exact matches

«I try to keep up with science, not people who have money to be made by not wanting things to change.»

He described the families of people with such difficult diseases as «so close to breaking,» and said that «science is going to catch up... But a big piece of that is... changing the paradigm of [medicine], dealing with costs, and dealing with availability.»

«When we launched our science initiative last year, I spoke about how we need to change that our government spends 50x more treating people who are sick than finding cures so people don't get sick in the first place,» he wrote.

Ashley Anderson, a postdoctoral fellow in the Center for Climate Change Communication at George Mason University, stated that «When people encounter an unfamiliar issue like nanotechnology, they often rely on an existing value such as religiosity or deference to science to form a judgment.»

But what a lot of people don't realize is that earth science data and earth science in general goes way beyond climate change.

Belsky's latest book is Why Smart People Make Big Money Mistakes — And How To Correct Them: Lessons from the Life - Changing Science of Behavioral Economics.

Subscribe: http://goo.gl/G5RXGs For our anniversary, we asked 10 of the smartest, most interesting, most influential people we know to describe our lives in 2021 - and the many ways technology, culture, science, and transportation will change.

Science can only be used as evidence for that which exists if people are willing to believe in facts, and are willing to have their understandings shaped and nuanced and developed — yes, even changed — as science reveals more and more intricate inforScience can only be used as evidence for that which exists if people are willing to believe in facts, and are willing to have their understandings shaped and nuanced and developed — yes, even changed — as science reveals more and more intricate inforscience reveals more and more intricate information.

we would self sustain ourselves... they have been the prime reason fr th recession due to higher oil prices to indirectly stage war against america and the rest of the world... cowards... if ther was no oil... the time has come for the next era... we are not far away from that day... the world is changing... science is developing in exponential way... new species are still being found... ther is always a progress... and these extremists are travelling to the end of the road... which will form the next journey fr the major part of the other world... no oil... no islamist would be heeded anymore... those people ll crumble very soon

Not only are irrefutable facts being challenged by people who do not understand the science involved or the importance of these facts, but the belief that there is no scientific consensus leads to a lack of attitudes to change.

Science is constantly changing but in most religions God is still in charge of the universe and keeps things running smoothly on a macro scale, people may disagree on a micro scale but most agree on a macro scale.

Ok we cant deny it anymore the church said, so lets say GOD created evolution but we will not calll it evolution because thats just is admitting that science was right, lets call it Smart design, and so creationism was born, its no surprise that any great discovery gets hijacked and twisted and changed to fit with the religious when so long before proven it gets denied by the same people.

People of science who «Know» what others should know are fools of the moment because as soon as science is sure of their fact the facts change.

Now tide has changed and its the same people clutching at straws to keep God on a level pegging with science.

Science has that built - in quality of being self - correcting — some people find that frustrating (to them it seems like scientists keep changing their minds), but it is one of the fundamental strengths of sScience has that built - in quality of being self - correcting — some people find that frustrating (to them it seems like scientists keep changing their minds), but it is one of the fundamental strengths of sciencescience.

Be afraid of money, be afraid of losing «the fire», be afraid of education, be afraid of theology, be afraid of growth and change, be afraid of gay and lesbian people, be afraid of art and science, be afraid of television, be afraid of artists, be afraid of reading books, be afraid of the news, be afraid of Islam, be afraid of the President, be afraid of the UN, be afraid of immigrant children, be afraid of other churches, be afraid of the Pope, be afraid of socialism, be afraid of the government, be afraid of the world, be afraid be afraid be afraid.

Critical thinker, You study a little science and suddenly you feel you have it figured out, Your meaning of life and the after life is based on other men's hypotheses, Yet it makes such good sense to you that you make a life choice based on it, then you stand up and criticize a person whose made a life choice based on A holy Book written 2000 years ago, When it comes down to it how are you any different, Your choices based on science which changes daily and theirs on the prophets.

Second tale: Defying all the best previous research on how readily people change their opinions, a young PhD student in political science at a top research university teams up with a senior scholar in his field at another top school to publish a brief report in America's leading scholarly scientific journal that upends everything we thought we knew about the subject.

Sarah Pullen, Director of Development at Feel Good Family, discusses the behavioural science behind changing people's eating habits and how this can increase both customer engagement and profit for food businesses.

The exhibit will present in an accessible way the fundamentals of weather and climate, the science behind climate change, and what actions people can take to reduce our own impact.

We are supposed to believe that obstetricians (with 8 years of higher education, extensive study of science and statistics, and four additional years of hands on experience caring for pregnant women), the people who actually DO the research that represents the corpus of scientific evidence, are ignoring their own findings while NCB advocates (generally high school graduates with no background in college science or statistics, let alone advanced study of these subjects, and limited experience of caring for pregnant women), the people who NEVER do scientific research, are assiduously scouring the scientific literature, reading the main obstetric journals each month, and changing their practice based on the latest scientific evidence.

I still believe, as I put it in chapter two, that «software», not «hardware» — the long, slow waves of cultural change, not the more obvious technological and economic changes that figure so prominently in public debate and academic social science — hold the key to the British predicament; that our ills form an interdependent system or, in medical language, a «syndrome»; and that they reflect the bewilderment and disorientation of a people who have forgotten the history that shaped them, and who therefore no longer know who they are.

Rob Ford, professor of political science at Manchester, captured the reversal of fortunes which the referendum wrought: «Feeling upset by wrenching social change imposed by people whose values you don't share or understand?

Delaying infrastructure decisions is no longer simply inconvenient, it's a matter of life and death for people in countries most affected by the adverse consequences of climate change, Mr Clarke will claim in a debate to be held during the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) Festival of Social Science

«We need our young people today to embrace science enthusiastically, to realise that challenges like climate change can only be beaten by motivated and dedicated scientists,» he told the Royal Society in Oxford this morning.

And even if the information could be more precise and predictive than it currently is, social science research indicates that knowing this information might not result in many people changing their lifestyle or behaviour.»

Signaling a profound turn away from the education policies of the Bloomberg administration, newly appointed schools chancellor Carmen Fariña promised to retreat from an emphasis on standardized testing and preparation, to re-focus on arts, social studies and science, and to implement changes that «happen with people, not to people.»

He also covered topics including clean energy - taking a dig at climate change doubters by suggesting his party «still believes in science» - as well as renewing manufacturing, easing student loan debt by allowing Americans to refinance them long - term, bringing more people into the workforce and providing equal pay.

Seeing how you can use simple science and engineering principles to change people's lives for the better made me want to find out more about these subjects.

Raise your glass to science and to the people who truly changed the world!

Those differences can be caused by people intent on misleading the public, like the organized campaigns to create doubt about the science pointing to human - caused climate change, she said.

Trump has already nominated a handful of people to fill these slots, including former Governor of Texas Rick Perry, who has questioned the science underlying climate change, as energy secretary.

Not many people can say they have a dual career in climate change science and comedy, but Josh Willis gives it a shot.

«A grandstand play, put on by people who don't like Trump or the GOP, regardless, that has nothing to do with climate change, alternative fuels or any other science.

«It's hard to believe there are people running for president who still refuse to accept the settled science of climate change, who'd rather remind us they're not scientists than listen to those who are,» Clinton states.

«This earthquake was something that was not foreseen by anybody, but it managed to change the way that people thought about nuclear power rather dramatically,» said Shcherbakova, who also serves as director of the Master of Science in Energy Management program at UT Dallas.

To be successful, she argues, the young scientist must: 1) be aware of the geography of the journey, 2) be open to as many options as possible so that course changes can be made with minimal pain, 3) practice solid «people» and presentation skills (oral and written) as often as possible, and 4) be committed to the endeavor of hard work that is successful science.

«The bright side is that this is an amazing opportunity to let people see science as a living thing that makes discoveries and changes.»

An apocalyptic message about climate change might motivate some people to act but make others feel hopeless, science communication experts say.

His work has shown that people's cultural identity, not their knowledge of science, drives their opinion on climate change.

However, he adds, «The nature of basic science is changing, and this is influencing the kind of people we are looking to recruit.»

The economy has dominated the headlines for years, but unforeseen consequences of life sciences and climate change mitigation are also beginning to weigh heavily on people's minds.

«Experts agree that this level can not be sustained for many decades without potentially catastrophic consequences,» reports the Geos Institute, an Oregon - based non-profit and consulting firm that uses science to help people predict, reduce and prepare for climate change.

I was the one sitting at the other end of the table, facing people who were relying on science to change, and possibly save, the life of their loved one.

Charles Godfray, a professor at the Department of Zoology at Oxford University who recently co-authored a paper in the journal Science about the challenges of feeding 9 billion people, said that the impact of climate change on agriculture will be negative.

Flooded farmland has already forced thousands of Bangladeshis to higher ground, but that's just the tip of the iceberg, so to speak, of the numbers of people who will need to move because of climate change in the coming decade, according to a report released by the Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN) at Columbia University, the United Nations University and CARE International today.

David Broockman and Joshua Kalla, then both political science graduate students at the University of California, Berkeley, decided in early 2015 to assess the effectiveness of deep canvassing in changing prejudicial attitudes toward transgender persons in south Florida.

Such a transition has been made possible by the convergence of several factors: a stream of new science showing an accelerating pace of climate change and its impacts; the everyday experience of people witnessing the change around them (and seeing it on the evening news); the compelling portrayals of what is happening and why, such as Al Gore's documentary An Inconvenient Truth and the 2007 reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; and the shifting stances of constituencies as diverse as evangelical Christians (who argue for protecting the climate on grounds of stewardship of God's creation) and military leaders (who argue on grounds of national secuchange and its impacts; the everyday experience of people witnessing the change around them (and seeing it on the evening news); the compelling portrayals of what is happening and why, such as Al Gore's documentary An Inconvenient Truth and the 2007 reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; and the shifting stances of constituencies as diverse as evangelical Christians (who argue for protecting the climate on grounds of stewardship of God's creation) and military leaders (who argue on grounds of national secuchange around them (and seeing it on the evening news); the compelling portrayals of what is happening and why, such as Al Gore's documentary An Inconvenient Truth and the 2007 reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; and the shifting stances of constituencies as diverse as evangelical Christians (who argue for protecting the climate on grounds of stewardship of God's creation) and military leaders (who argue on grounds of national secuChange; and the shifting stances of constituencies as diverse as evangelical Christians (who argue for protecting the climate on grounds of stewardship of God's creation) and military leaders (who argue on grounds of national security).

In four cleverly designed experiments reported online this week in Science, psychologists explore how the Internet may be changing the way people handle information.

«Joining forces with science - driven organizations such as the U.S. Air Force and Gatorade will help us to deliver on a new class of wearable technology — one that provides quantitative information on sweat, with the potential to fundamentally change the way that people manage their hydration, health and performance,» Ghaffari said.