Sentences with phrase «change science since»

According to Greenpeace, the Koch Brothers have sent at least $ 100,343,292 to 84 groups denying climate change science since 1997.

«I have been involved in climate change science since 1988 and by 1992 I realized there was very little science to back up the claims of anthropogenic global warming.

It will be the fifth time the panel has assessed the state of climate change science since it was founded in 1988.

Their «takeover» & subsequent suppression of dissenting views has caused politicalization, paralysis & even regression of climate - change science since ~ 1990.

The Fraser Institute has published material skeptical of climate change science since at least 2001, which marks the publication of Global Warming: A Guide to the Science by Willie Soon and Sallie L. Baliunas The abstract states: «There is no clear evidence, nor unique attribution, of the global effects of anthropogenic CO2 on climate.

So, here is a man who has every reason to deny the reality of climate change (he did once, before becoming PM, say «climate change is crap», but has accepted climate change science since becoming PM).

is an important new report that documents the key findings in climate change science since the 2007 IPCC Science report.

«Climate Change Science since 2007.

Not exact matches

Researchers at the frontier of science are making possible technologies likely to change civilization more than anything since electricity.

The history of climate change denialism since the 1980s has really been the culmination of the attack on environmental science.

Lamar Smith (R. - Tx), who heads the House Committee on Science, Space and Technology, has demanded that New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman turn over all communication since 2012 between his office and climate change campaigners whose research led to him opening his probe.

This may come as a shock to you — BUT - evolution could not be proven beyond a reasonable doubt in court — if it is a «Law» of science and not a theory explain to me why Scientist in the same field have differing opinions theory has undergone massive changes since the 1850's when Darwin first came up with the THEORY — there are a lot of interesting similarities to true science which makes it sound so plausible, but it should sound good — After all the top scientist / humanists in the world promote it and they are all pretty smart

Since no one has yet to SEE an atom, the idea of the structure of the atom can only be inferred by experimental evidence — yet I see no Republican trying to stop teaching the structure of the atom in school — oh that's right, its because major corporations and industries rely on this science (pharm, weapons manufacturers etc etc) whereas the theory of evolution is merely think piece of scientists on how life on Earth changes over time.

The same can be said about many atheists, since they believe in science, which is constantly changing, being updated, being proven wrong, and being proven correct.

to Jake, in every era or times in the past, humans have different perception of reality, because our knowledge improves or changes toward sophistication, For example during the times of Jesus, there was no science yet as what we have today, since the religion in the past corresponds to their needs, it is true for them in the past, but today we already knew many new ideas and facts, so what is applicable in the past is no longer today, like religion, we have also to change to conform with todays knowledge.The creation or our origin for example is now explained beyond doubt by science as the big bang and evolution is the reason we become humans, is in contrast to creation in the bibles genesis,.

Even if in the earlier book the envisaging had been attributed to God, the situation would not have been changed, since Whitehead wrote in Science and the Modern World that «God is not concrete (SMW 257.)

The change that has come about in theologies that partake of creative and emergent evolution can be described in this way: since mechanism is no longer the base of their evolutionary thinking, idealism is no longer essential as a strategy of thought in resolving the tension between science and faith.

As such, and since the God of Islam is the same God of Christianity and Judaism (according to the Quran that just been certified), Christianity and Judaism are true religions of God with text that has been corrupted (another reason you find contradictions with science because ordinary humans changed the word of God so you can see the flaws in it).

Basic science posits that all physical matter is finite, the slightest motion in the universe (e.g. expansion, contraction, etc.) is change, and change means that the universe had a «beginning» since it is expanding, hence is temporal, hence is finite.

«Despite the many changes that have taken place in American society and culture over the past 30 years, including new discoveries in biological and social science, there has been virtually no sustained change in Americans» views of the origin of the human species since 1982,» wrote Gallup's Frank Newport.

Yet there has been a change in science since the end of the eighteenth century.

However, scientific truth which keeps on changing can obviously not be taken either by faith (that's not what science is) nor as an absolute truth, since it is subject to change.

Serious brain science around meditation has emerged only in about the last decade, since the birth of functional MRI allowed scientists to begin watching the brain and monitoring its changes in relatively real time.

The loss of theological intelligibility since the beginning of the Giffords has more to do with social and political changes than with the development of science.

She cites a study which analyzes survey data revealing that, since the mid-1970s, a falling percentage of college - educated conservatives claim to «trust science,» compared to relatively stable numbers among liberals, and argues that those who oppose contraception, question the Neo-Darwinist narrative of evolution, or disagree with certain political measures to address global climate change, are opposed to science in general....

Since taking leadership of the country last September, Prime Minister Tony Abbott, who in 2009 said the science behind climate change was «crap», has abolished the independent Climate Commission, the body created by the former Labor government to provide public information on the effects of global warming.

In its report, the task force cited both the cultural changes and advances in reproductive medical science — especially in vitro fertilization — since the state first prohibited surrogacy arrangements in 1992.

Early - career scientists and engineers may be understandably apprehensive about change in Washington, particularly since «attention to science during the presidential campaign was neither appreciable nor appreciative,» wrote Holt for Motherboard.

Some of that heavy - duty self - analysis dealt with my career, but I spent most of that traveling time thinking about how science careers have changed since I started as a recruiter more than 25 years ago.

Since then, he has received support from the Park Service, including a four - day training course on climate change science and communication earlier this year.

The tools of science have changed since the golden age of physics, but many of the same questions remain

The science of climate change has moved on a great deal in the six years since the last IPCC report.

But it has been 5 years since Science's Next Wave brought you that feature, and in that time, the landscape has changed considerably for would - be patent attorneys, agents, and technical specialists.

New research published today in Nature Geoscience by Richard Zeebe, professor at the University of Hawai'i — Mānoa School of Ocean and Earth Science and Technology (SOEST), and colleagues looks at changes of Earth's temperature and atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) since the end of the age of the dinosaurs.

Since climate change is already leading to higher average temperatures overall, the finding that extremes are also more likely was not surprising, said Sophie Lewis, a climate scientist at the University of Melbourne and the climate system science center and the lead author on the paper.

«In studying one of the most dramatic episodes of global change since the end of the age of the dinosaurs, these scientists show that we are currently in uncharted territory in the rate carbon is being released into the atmosphere and oceans,» says Candace Major, program director in the National Science Foundation (NSF)'s Division of Ocean Sciences, which funded the research.

«Nothing EPA presented suggests anything has changed since August of last year — the science remains inconclusive in terms of data, impact, and source,» Hock wrote.

Since the early 1970s, this climatologist and science popularizer has been a fixture on TV news shows, on Capitol Hill, and on White House panels, where he weighs in on both the politics and science of climate change.

But what may or may not have happened does not change the science - ice sheets are melting, sea level is rising and the top ten hottest years since 1880 include 2001 through 2008.

For example, tobacco smoking has been in a steady decline since the 1960s with all sorts of factors driving this trend — improved science and epidemiology, education through labeling and advertising campaigns, and greater public awareness of risks — all of which could be applied to behaviors that contribute to climate change.

The Hall of Human Origins has gone jazzy and interactive — and that's excellent, as both science and museumgoing have changed dramatically since the days when dusty dioramas dominated the exhibits.

«The evolutionary changes required to build the giraffe's imposing structure and to equip it with the necessary modifications for its high - speed sprinting and powerful cardiovascular functions have remained a source of scientific mystery since the 1800s, when Charles Darwin first puzzled over the giraffe's evolutionary origins,» said Cavener, a professor of biology and the Verne M. Willaman Dean of the Eberly College of Science at Penn State.

The technology portion of Romney's platform does not appear to have changed much since his run in 2008, when he said, «It is time to invest substantially in technologies related to power generation, nanotechnology and materials science.»

Independent reviews have since rejected the charges of scientific conspiracy, but the damage is done: the U.S. public once again swings toward disbelief in the basic science of human - induced climate change.

In science, many things have changed since 2002, when «Writing a Research Plan» was written, but many things have also stayed the same.

Science weighs in: Not just our lives but also our genes have changed in the 10,000 years since agriculture, making us different in many ways from our Paleolithic ancestors.

The US National Science Foundation's investments directed toward climate change research have increased substantially since 1987, but biodiversity expenditures have increased much less and have held steady since 2004.

Soil science is especially important, since the interaction of water with soil nutrients spurs changes to nearby plants and animals.

Although that formula has produced excellent science — Max Planck scientists have won 10 Nobel Prizes since 1984 — some critics contend that it has prevented the society from reacting quickly enough to sudden changes in the scientific landscape and has isolated its researchers from Germany's university system and from colleagues at other institutes (Science, 4 June 1999, p.science — Max Planck scientists have won 10 Nobel Prizes since 1984 — some critics contend that it has prevented the society from reacting quickly enough to sudden changes in the scientific landscape and has isolated its researchers from Germany's university system and from colleagues at other institutes (Science, 4 June 1999, p.Science, 4 June 1999, p. 1595).

This is surely due to the changes of earth's obliquity, since changes in the amplitude of the climate signal correspond to changes in the amplitude of the obliquity cycle (Lisiecki & Raymo 2007, Quaternary Science Reviews, 26, 56).