Sentences with phrase «change science sure»

Conclusion The scientific, economic, and long - term moral realities of climate - change science sure ain't simple... and sure are sobering... eh Climate Etc readers!

• some climate - change scientists sure ain't saints (or even wise), and • the weakest climate - change science sure ain't strong.

Not exact matches

On Monday, as Irma weakened over Georgia, Bossert used a White House briefing to offer more hints of an emerging climate resilience policy, while notably avoiding accepting climate change science: «What President Trump is committed to is making sure that federal dollars aren't used to rebuild things that will be in harm's way later or that won't be hardened against the future predictable floods that we see.

People of science who «Know» what others should know are fools of the moment because as soon as science is sure of their fact the facts change.

Eberstadt hopes that the data collected through decades of social science research will lead to a change in behavior, but I'm not so sure that is the case.

The Texas governor and would - be president may not have much time for science when it comes to climate change or evolution, but Rick Perry sure likes it when it helps him get elected.

We extract science by carefully modeling all the ways in which the spacecraft and the instruments themselves could have caused the apparent brightness of a planetary system to change over time... We are pretty sure we can trust our models of Spitzer down to about a part in 10,000; we are in uncharted territory as far as detector behavior is concerned.»

Manica is not yet sure if Science will change the title of the paper, «Ancient Ethiopian genome reveals extensive Eurasian admixture throughout the African continent».

Earth science would grow from $ 1.439 billion to $ 1.797 billion in 2012, though House of Representatives Republicans are sure to attack a program focused on understanding global change.

By the dawn of the 20th century science was moving so fast many people were sure humans were on the verge of tremendous change.

There is no analog for climate change as humans have triggered it, so our sensitivities are even less sure than the science suggests, even with Earth System Sensitivity since it also presumably doesn't account for rate of change nor the preconditioning the human presence has resulted in.

Because the room was mostly full of local students, it wasn't super high level science, but he did make sure to communicate to the students that STEM is important, that no one at NASA works alone - collaboration is key, and that science is always changing.

We are all scientists as science is simply the expression of what is thought to be known and is forever changing as the collective conciusness evolves, but that's not to say we can't learn from each other just must be sure of the intentions of those we look to for clues.

(d) He said the fourth system change concerns the way we organize ourselves as humans, urging us to make sure our organizational principles align with what we know about the planet (he admitted he fully accepts the climate change science).

This packet includes: Cover Page Introduction and Set up Page 2 pages of ELA, and Next Generation Science Standards for K - 2 Lesson Procedure Teacher Preparation Sheets Poster Combatting Climate Change Differentiated Self Assessment Combatting Climate Change Letter Writing Extension Combatting Climate Change Polar Bears and Car clipart Combatting Climate Change Headers Combatting Climate Change Circle Map Combatting Climate Change Brainstorming Ideas Combatting Climate Change Booklet Combatting Climate Change Differentiated Self - Assessment Combatting Climate Change Banner for classroom display Please make sure to rate and leave feedback!

Sure enough, the game isn't devoted to character development, but Dr. Science changes from a wacky companion offering advice to a freaked out and somewhat incapable man.

The climate science also sure is subject to severe political pressures from varying lobbyist groups, first and foremost the oil an coal interests which are huge financial powerhouses especially in the US Senate — a body which in reality dictates the whole global «climate policy» or rather the absence of any such — serious climate politicans round the globe in reality have — as we now have seen — no chance at all against the denying forces and their huge media apparatus, as long as the public don't see some very serious consequences of climate change, fx.

Sure, the political aspects of climate change are legitimately important in all this and may override that actual science.

Nearly everyone I have encountered who dismisses AGW is either pretty ignorant about doing science (that's fine, I am sure they are good at other things - it's unrealistic to believe scientific literacy could be universal), or are just plainly unable to contemplate or accept the changes required in the organisation of human affairs (even though these changes would also happen in the absence of global warming), or are just full of anti-environmental politics for various delusional reasons of their won.

From Curry's place: Mapleleaf «Dr. Curry, I'm sure that you agree (correct me if you don't) that the science behind the theory of anthropogenic induced climate change is a long one, and very well established (I can hear the cries of indignance from those in denial about AGW / ACC already), and borne out by multiple, independent data sets and consilience.

«Conservatives Don't Hate Climate Change, They Hate the Proposed Solutions» not sure I would call myself a «conservative» but I am a «denier,» therefore I must a «conservative» according to the authors of this «study,» I «deny» science because I find the implications «scary» no they only thing I find scary is trash «research» like this however, photos of Mitch McConnell are scary even when they have no relevance to the subject Really, the mindlessness of this kind of stuff is disturbing

I am sure this analysis here will now in response be mangled as well (and my comments taken out of context, misrepresented, or me insulted), because, as usual, for most commenters, the goal is to refute Climate Change science and conclusions under the self deluded guise of «objective, open minded analysis.»

On Monday, as Irma weakened over Georgia, Bossert used a White House briefing to offer more hints of an emerging climate resilience policy, while notably avoiding accepting climate change science: «What President Trump is committed to is making sure that federal dollars aren't used to rebuild things that will be in harm's way later or that won't be hardened against the future predictable floods that we see.

«The basic science is well enough understood to be sure that our climate is changing — and that we need to act.»

I assumed @AndyWest was referring to latter, since he was makiing a point about the relative comprehension of climate science among members of the public who «believe in» & «don't believe in» human - caused climate change (also, I'm pretty sure I underscored «correct» answers only in a graphic of item response profiles of latter).

Sure there will be debate about science, observations and the empiric evidence will change, our knowledge evolves, but the fits and starts are always generally in a positive direction.

Hansen's outstanding scientific track record sure explains why James Hansen's climate - change science is nowadays receiving the full attention of Popes Benedict * and * Francis!

He notes that Gavin Schmidt, the director of NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Science, offers evidence contrary to Morano's claims:» There's different kinds of extreme weather, some of which is increasing because of climate change, some of which is decreasing, some of which we're not quite sure what the impacts are,» Schmidt said.

The language that gets changed in the body is not changing the science; it's changing the descriptions of the science in a draft that has been edited, re-edited, re-edited, and re-edited to make sure the conclusions in the text are every bit as precise as the carefully considered summary.

2 March: ABC The World Today: Fad not facts: call for new approach to climate change ELEANOR HALL: An Australian National University science academic says it is time to call in the advertising industry to make sure that the warnings from climate scientists hit home... Dr Rod Lamberts, says scientists have done all they can to alert governments to the need for action, but that professional marketing may be more effective..

He has a very expensive stake in making sure public opinion on the science of climate change is split by doubt.

Science sure has changed or at least seems it has if such simple data is not available.

While not presenting such lawsuits as a sure thing, Mr. Carney alluded to multi-billion dollar lawsuits against the Asbestos industry and said that the risks of such litigation «will only increase as the science and evidence of climate change hardens.»

Unfortunately, the popular media's bad behavior when it comes to science reporting is unlikely to change any time soon, and you're sure to hear more provocative and conflicting headlines about same - sex parents and families in the New Year.

Dabbled with bits of attachment science, case examples and practical suggestions, it's sure to leave you feeling more positive and prepared to navigate the changing roles in your family.