Sentences with phrase «change scores for»

We then returned to our original categorization and evaluated the change scores for the regulators and nonregulators in both age groups, t (23) = −.80, p =.44 and t (32) = −.66, p =.52, respectively.

An influx of new students, whether caused by changing school boundary lines or the construction of a new housing development, or the departure of high scorers could change scores for an entire grade.

Not exact matches

We have a system that, quite heroically, allows for a dramatic change in policy direction without upending the governmental institutions that have served this nation well for 12 score years.

By the time overtime hit, with the Patriots marching down the field for an inevitable score, his mood had changed drastically.

The name of the game for entrepreneurs is to change the way businesses keep score.

«It actually scored above 100 in our system before we had to make some changes to account for this car.»

If your product line is one that involves frequent changes — say, clothing, for example — you may want to hire a manufacturer's representative who'll present your line among the others he or she pitches in return for a percentage of the sales, says SCORE»S Lehman.

The hypothetical portfolios would then be rebalanced for each year of the study period — 1997 to 2014 — to reflect changes that would have occurred over the space of those years as new high - scoring companies were identified and added as a result of the yearly CHAA process.

Don't apply for new credit since changes in credit score may impact your ability to qualify for a mortgage or get a lower rate.

For example, you may have been working at improving your credit score and now qualify for a new mortgage with a better discount, or you may want to stabilize your payments by changing from a variable rate mortgage to a fixed - raFor example, you may have been working at improving your credit score and now qualify for a new mortgage with a better discount, or you may want to stabilize your payments by changing from a variable rate mortgage to a fixed - rafor a new mortgage with a better discount, or you may want to stabilize your payments by changing from a variable rate mortgage to a fixed - rate.

«Maintaining a strong credit score will help students later in life as their goals change from paying for education to buying their first car, starting a business or buying their first home,» said Jarman.

For the third profile, we changed the home value and used a credit score range of 760 and above.

Whether or not you're borrowing an Upgrade personal loan, you can sign up for weekly updates on your credit score through Upgrade's Credit Health platform, as well as get email alerts for any changes.

There's a push to change which credit scores are used to qualify for government - backed mortgages.

Similar to other agencies, Equifax also offers paid credit monitoring services for $ 5.99 per month, allowing you to track changes to all three scores as well as any new credit or public record activity.

If you're one of the few whose insurance score was affected by the credit report changes, it's likely it's for the better.

For every change in tax law, there are scores of people who want to outrun it and beat the system.

The score so far is something like Google / Apple 50, Microsoft 1 (Bing «s working) in terms of innovation, but in technology, this can change out of nowhere (see Palm Inc for an example).

For over two years scores of litigants have been challenging the HHS mandate, which forces nearly all non-grandfathered employee health plans to change their terms, if they do not already cover sterilization, contraception, and abortifacient pharmaceuticals as «free preventive care» for female employees and dependenFor over two years scores of litigants have been challenging the HHS mandate, which forces nearly all non-grandfathered employee health plans to change their terms, if they do not already cover sterilization, contraception, and abortifacient pharmaceuticals as «free preventive care» for female employees and dependenfor female employees and dependents.

Particular scores for particular nation - states change through time, but the tendency for one characteristic of a nation to associate with another characteristic changes only very slowly if at all.

I can only give it a 3 based on my changes, so maybe not a fair score for the white cake.

When one of our competitors couldn't get wait times below 30 minutes and guest service scores continued to slip as a result, the management at Omni knew it was time for a change.

Love us have lemer aswell just give us something get excited about and Sanchez bang in hatrick and for him tap da crest after he scores and while I'm at it love wenger to zip up he's jacket first go and would it be refreshing to see Steve Boulding get up and start barking at players now that's change I'd settle for that 2 nil arsenal to win and mahrez to miss pen that's my prediction

But are we entering an era in which it's not that unusual for two teams to combine for seven home runs, six half - innings with three or more runs scored, and violent lead changes?

d term» world class» is used loosely... giroud is a good striker but showed y he can't b trusted as our no9... missed easier chance but still scored... don't care if u sai he's not good enough but since he plays for AFC, I'll cheer him on for France 24/7... when he's at arsenal, plays like a donkey and he turns to s ** troud, then I'll change my tune... OT, did u see pogba??? believe he has gotten carried with d hype «golden boy of France»....

Listen man I don't care about France I'm an Arsenal fan and the fact remains he didn't score is 15 straight games for us, what Giroud does for France is of no use to Arsenal and doesn't change the fact that he's not good enough to win us the title!

Still, Wright clearly feels Lacazette could make a slight change to his game to score even more goals for Arsenal, and spoke on Match of the Day 2 about how he could adapt the way he gets involved in the Gunners» build - up play.

you all claimed that once he got paces players ahead of him that things would change and we would score for fun and that ozil would rule the world.

Walcott started this campaign by missing a penalty against Liverpool, suggesting that some things never change, only for him to score moments later.

So if Wenger is planning for his team to try to get the fluent, creative and scoring Arsenal back he may be thinking of making a few changes and the first of those for me would be in the middle.

So Yes some things has to change maybe Wenger has to listen a bit more to his best players, adapt & alter tactics for the sake of winning or keeping a hold on the score but the players have to be hungrier!

Also Wenger bottled out from bringing Perez on and changed his mind after Sanchez scored and played out for the draw by bringing on Elneny instead.

While that could still change this summer, the 29 - year - old has established himself as a key figure for Chelsea and Conte this season, scoring 13 goals and providing 11 assists in 48 appearances in all competitions.

You lot can bash Wenger for penny pinching board or Giroud for a pass behind given by Ozil (which Giroud scored though) but nothing will change and that is a good thing.

I wont blame Wenger for playing the starting lineup, after all we started winning the game on top of that LLoris did a couple of good saves that if we have scored would have defined the game... the problem with WENGER is and has been that he wont adapt, change tactics when is needed.

Giroud scored 16 league goals, he's been the main striker for 4 seasons but didn't score the goals required to win the title so he's better off as a sub to come change the game as Plan B!

For a playing style like that of Arsenal where Midfielders have so much freedom to go forward and change positions you cant say he cant score 10 - 12 goals a season if he shows the intent to do so.

I'm not complaining but why change a winning formula our attack has been scoring goals for fun and walcott has been terrorizing defenses.

For vitality and to rejunvinate the Gunners scoring ability, I have made 4 changes to the Boss» starts that started the last Barca game.

I tell you from a footballing point of view scoring 8 goals you got have players that know where the goal posts are it takes energy and creativity to score 8 yes I agree vikings changed their players because their league is starting i think tomorrow so yes they were not a big team team but to say that Arsenal were not strong thats a bit to much and I say it again you need energy and creativity to score 8 I was very happy they did that Arsenal are well known for creating chances yesterday they converted them chances into Goals this should be the norm and I hope this will give them a lesson on how to win a game as they did nt dwell about with the ball it was goal after goal and that tells me that they went for the goals directly and I hope and wish the young guns all the best and to do well in the next season

Bowling Green's Anderson Arena is a gussied - up name for an honest gym that has scarcely changed since the early 1960s, the heyday of Nate Thurmond and Howard Komives — the same Komives whose career school scoring record will likely fall tonight to star forward Anthony Stacey.

But for whatever reason, Wenger with the assumption that he can create a chance for goal scoring hardly change him in games, even when it's obvious to all that he is struggling.

I wouldn't go so far as saying AW missed a trick as BFG has an obvious issue too and if he had played maybe instead of Carroll it was Payet who scored a hattrick and we would be here slamming AW for changing a winning line up that has kept clean sheets in the last two games.

Perez gets brought on for the last 8 minutes, would've scored a goal, had it not been hand balled away by a hull defender, looked more dangerous and committed than Walcott did in 70 minutes, changed the complexion of the game and he wasn't fit to start that game????? You don't need to a physio to tell that, you just need a pair of eyes.

That was a game changing event only due to the fact that it was over for even thinking you can score again, let alone qualifying.

Giroud forgets that his role as a striker is to score goals.His hold up play is excellent, but a striker should be concentrating on scoring.He needs to change his game so he can loose his marker and play a more effective role for the team.

@Nothing Changed i agree about 5 years ago, personally i'm finding our game exiting to watch with a strong belief that no mater what the score is we will win the game, obviously we don't win every game but the belief is there for me and i'm enjoying watching more then last season, we have to except that some teams in Europe are almost impossible to catch and City is coming close to that point of dominating years to come and only Man - U or Chelsea could muster up a small challenge, sad but unfortunately we have to face up to reality.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

The formation won't work this season with Giroud out till after Xmas and with Wenger spending so much on pace for the wings, our style of play will have to change or we won't be scoring any goals.

In the first meeting with Pittsburg, Rivers rushed for 157 yards and two TDs while also completing a 9 - yard touchdown pass early in the game and a 97 - yard momentum - changing kick return for a score in the third quarter.