Not exact matches
Senate Democrats aren't the only ones seeking
changes to what was approved in the budget: Republicans and Democrats in both chambers have introduced bills aimed at extending the deadline for developing regulations for the
teacher evaluations as well unlinking the enactment of the
standards on the local level to a boost in school aid.
The lower court's 2016 ruling had mandated a sweeping overhaul of the state's education system, including
changes to
teacher evaluations, educational
standards and special education services.
Regent's Chancellor Emeritus Robert Bennett echoed King saying the state will continue to tweak the
standards as necessary and advise the legislature about
changes to the
teacher evaluation law.
As for the
changes to the
teacher evaluation system, testing and
standards, Elia said state education officials will continue their review and work with the Legislature to make
changes accordingly.
Schools should focus
teacher evaluation and feedback efforts on the specific instructional
changes required for the gap
standards.
Many point to the decision to «put the pedal to the metal» on
teacher evaluation at the same time the state's school districts and
teachers were grappling with Common Core and the
changes in practice the higher
standards demanded.
But it is also clear that the NBPTS has
changed the conversation about teaching within the profession by setting and gaining acceptance of its high
standards and by persuading
teachers and their unions to begin to accept performance
evaluation and differential certification and pay for
teachers.
Occurring in rough parallel have been all manner of external policy
changes —
standards, accountability, choice,
teacher evaluation, funding shifts, categorical programs, etc. — that may have advanced, retarded, or simply ignored the innovators.
And in recent years, most states have adopted sweeping educational policy
changes, including
teacher evaluations tied to test scores and Common Core academic
standards that have
changed what and how students learn in the classroom.
Chris Cerf argued for the critical role of big system
changes around things like accountability,
standards, and
teacher evaluation.
In exchange for relief, the administration is requiring a quid pro quo: States must adopt
changes that include meaningful
teacher and principal
evaluation systems, make sure all students are ready for college or careers, upgrade academic
standards and lift up their lowest - performing schools.
He oversaw a vigorous expansion of the federal role in the nation's 100,000 public schools, largely bypassing Congress to induce states to adopt landmark
changes, including new
teacher evaluations and academic
standards.
«From higher
standards to new
evaluation systems, the teaching profession is
changing rapidly and
teachers want to play a role in shaping the way those policies are implemented.
This second group, with Diane Ravitch as its most prominent member, has raised concerns over who stands to gain financially from the Common Core effort, the role of the Gates Foundation in the
standards» creation, the lack of field testing of the
standards, and the way in which the
standards have been implemented in the midst of
changing assessment and
teacher evaluation policies.
And other
teachers worried about putting the new
evaluation systems in place at a time when
standards and tests are
changing, thanks to the Common Core State
Standards.
But in doing so, Duncan largely bypassed Congress to mandate that states adopt landmark
changes — policies such as closing achievement gaps, and implementing
teacher evaluations and college and career ready academic
standards.
Indeed, as University of South Carolina law professor Derek W. Black writes in a recent analysis of waivers, not only does NCLB not authorize conditional waivers, even if a court were to read any waiver authorization as implicitly authorizing conditions, the actual conditions attached — «college - and career - ready
standards,» new
teacher evaluations, etc. — fundamentally
change the law.
The
evaluation has been
changed or «improved» along the way, but that process has caused confusion as the
standard by which
teachers are evaluated seems to
change from year to year.
We can cuss and discuss common
standards, standardized test scores,
teacher evaluations, funding, etc., etc., until the cows come home, and things will never
change for the better.
As the largest inner city district, it would be the most affected by any legislation authorizing state - funded vouchers,
changes in charter school rules, and new
evaluation standards for district
teachers.