Sentences with phrase «change theories on»

ALL non-input change theories on climate are a manifestation of the affect of «residence time.»

Have you or ANYONE in psuedo science found transitional fossils, and how many times did the late Harvard paleontologist Stephen Gould change his theory on naturalistic evolution?

Not exact matches

Many people have theories why Niantic made these changes — some think the game's three - step tracker had a negative impact on the «Pokémon GO» servers, so they shut down the feature until they could fix the problem — but most people are frustrated not just because this crucial feature was removed, but because Niantic hasn't given any kind of official explanation, and has done nothing to calm worried fans.

In theory, you could hold an individual bond to maturity and never lose any money even though the market value of the bond may fluctuate based on changing interest rates and other factors (but you could still lose out to inflation over time).

The theory behind it is simple: If Facebook has experimented on its users to find new and exciting ways to get us to use it in the way they'd prefer, we should also feel free to experiment on Facebook, and see if those experiments change how we think about what we share with one of the biggest repositories of human data in history.

The Butterfly Effect is a theory that is based on a single occurrence that can profoundly change the course of events; no matter how insignificant that occurrence is perceived to be.

«The theory of evolution explains how life on Earth has changed.

Theories can change, be modified or rejected based on new evidence.

The theory ABOUT evolution most widely accepted is an updating of Charles Darwin's hypothesis that all of today's species descended from common ancestors due to natural selection based on best current fitness for constantly changing environmental circmmstances.

Since no one has yet to SEE an atom, the idea of the structure of the atom can only be inferred by experimental evidence — yet I see no Republican trying to stop teaching the structure of the atom in school — oh that's right, its because major corporations and industries rely on this science (pharm, weapons manufacturers etc etc) whereas the theory of evolution is merely think piece of scientists on how life on Earth changes over time.

The timing of what you post today goes with the section talking about «he will come again to judge the living and the dead» which is where I would guess that there'd be that change in the axis on your theory from things understood of Jesus to things understood of the Holy Spirit.

Over the last decade, Davidson and his colleagues have produced scientific evidence for the theory that meditation - the ancient eastern practice of sitting, usually accompanied by focusing on certain objects - permanently changes the brain for the better.

ALL evidence points to the theory of evolution being the proper explanation of how life changes on this planet.

Yet since, on the other hand, the single step separating case two from the older theory involves the entire difference between admitting and not admitting real change, growth, possibility of profit.

Thomas Kuhn's work on paradigm shifts in the history of science presents the idea that changes or increases in our understanding not only fill out gaps in previous knowledge, but at times bring about a reorganisation of the structure of the theories or paradigms by which previous ideas were organised and understood.

Gregory's analysis is largely consistent with modern behavior modification theory and behavior therapy that focuses on actual, regularized, visible, even measurable, behavior change more than the hidden mysteries of supposed intentionality.35

Berger has subsequently and substantively changed his thinking about religion and secularization, but the theory set forth in that book continues to have enormous influence on the discussion of these questions.

Focusing on schizophrenia as a particular exemplar of this change, Luhrmann examines the evolution of psychiatry from psychoanalysis (mental illnesses are caused by emotional conflict) to a purely biomedical scheme (mental illnesses are caused by genes) to present theories, which incorporate both the biological and the social causes (and treatments) of mental illness.

Whatever are our core fundamental beliefs are subject to continued scrutiny and revision of all theories based on changes to these core beliefs.

Also the classroom should present what modern scientists teach on evolution because the theory has changed over the years.

Inflation is not the first set of theories to predict gravity waves or an epicenter to the universe either, so not much has changed on that front except that we can now make models which reflect these waveforms and weed out disagreeing models.

John Courtney Murray and others proposed a theory of development based on changing historical circumstances.

Why should science change its mind on evolution when science has vast amounts of evidence to back up its theory?

Applications of world - system theory to questions of religious change have focused to a great extent on the ways in which short - term changes in the world economy may affect the stability of religious institutions.

On the theory of strict identity, all change consists in attaching predicates to a strictly identical subject (or substance) which endures throughout the succession of predicates.

Secondly, science is an every changing study, with theories and ideas constantly evolving on a daily basis.

However, in a section appended to his lecture on «Relativity,» Whitehead changed his mind.7 On this atomic theory of events, there was a lowest threshold for actual events, below which it can not be subdivided into smaller actual eventon «Relativity,» Whitehead changed his mind.7 On this atomic theory of events, there was a lowest threshold for actual events, below which it can not be subdivided into smaller actual eventOn this atomic theory of events, there was a lowest threshold for actual events, below which it can not be subdivided into smaller actual events.

Also there is evidence of molecular mechanisms in the cell membranes that can amplify small changes in the field to produce large changes in neural activity.13 On the other hand, earlier tests of Kohler's theory found that interference with electrical gradients over the cortex had no effect on behavioral measures (see note 11 for reference to these studiesOn the other hand, earlier tests of Kohler's theory found that interference with electrical gradients over the cortex had no effect on behavioral measures (see note 11 for reference to these studieson behavioral measures (see note 11 for reference to these studies).

Since theories are explanations, they can change on the basis of new data.

We recognize that our ideas and beliefs are based on theory and subject to change.

Evolution, on the materialistic theory, is reduced to the role of being another word for the description of the changes of the external relations between portions of matter.

Nevertheless, it takes seriously the developments in critical Bible studies, the new insights gained from the social sciences of cultural anthropology and sociology, the impact of technology and political theory in rapid cultural change and the issues raised by cross-cultural communication on a global scale.

Theories change, evolution is old science with less than minimal proof yet we still hold on to it.

I thought Evangel readers would appreciate knowing about my Christianity Today interview with James Davison Hunter, Professor of Religion, Culture, and Social Theory at the University of Virginia and author of To Change the World: The Irony, Tragedy and Possibility of Christianity in the Late Modern World (Oxford, 2010), which promises to be the most important book written on Christian cultural engagement in the last 50 years.

But with the rejection of that theory of the physical, with on the contrary a conception of the physical as «active,» we face a quite different situation respecting the problem of change.

It is based on what man knows to be at the time, but as I said, even theories based on «facts» has been proven to change.

It may sometimes happen that a fundamental difference of opinion on matters of principle may persist in theory, and retain real importance, while the circumstances of life and action change so much that the difference of opinion is of less moment for life and action than it previously was.

Bohm (1969, p. 18) has said that our physical theories are at present in a state of flux, that may lead to radical changes in them, such that current fundamental ideas, based on measure and metric, may also have to be replaced by new ideas, based on order.»

Evolution is simply a theory explaining what we have observed about how life changes on this planet.

Based on the theorys of Science (which do change at times) how do you know that your not living in Delusions of Granduer?

It is interesting to me to think about evolution, where things change over long periods of time and where there may only be theories about the catalysts, in contrast to those that we have put on the fast - track ourselves, such as those you have exemplified.

Even Einstein who's theories predicted black holes thought that surely nature would now allow such a thing, turns out the evidence and his theories were correct and his hope / belief needed to change on that point.

And let's remember that evolution, while it's a theory, is a theory about the beginning and the transformation of life based on things we have observed, namely that cells change and mutate and that those mutations can produce cells that are unique and new, and that it would follow that it's possible for molecules to form into single - celled organisms which mutate and combine into multi-cellular organisms which mutate, adapt, and grow over time into new forms of life.

PDX — It doesn't take a Genius to realize from my statements that i have read things other than the Bible you moron i have spent many hours reading and listening to scientists about their theories on the big bang, i have listened to ideas from the most revered scientists including Hawking and others, and they all admit that there are holes in their theories, that nothing fully explains their big bang theory, the physics doesn't add up let alone the concept, there are plenty of scientists hard at work trying to make the numbers fit and the theory hold weight but if you ask any of them they can not give you the answers and the reason being... there are none, the theory doesn't work, If by the observable laws of Physics, Matter in this Universe can not be created or destroyed, you can only change its state, i.e. solid to liquid, to gas... to energy... There is no explanation for how an entire reality full of Matter can be created out of nothing... Scientists know this... idiots that are atheists and simply would rather NOT believe that their lives and actions they take within their lifespan are being witnessed by an Omnipotent God do not WANT to believe... but Your belief in God does not change whether or not he exists you will be judged.

The theory is both conservative, because it's based on previous knowledge, and radical, because it requires a major change in our way of thinking.

generates a «sour» review they could (in theory) change the end of that very show as soon as they read it... the Story NXT tells is set on film (digital file) 4 days to 4 weeks before the Audience sees it, to adjust their sails for that would require back stage re-shoots and post production edits (look at Impact scrambling to re-write their Pre-tape to cover for ADR's release)... easier to let it ride, see if the opinions stay sour, and then IF Needed adjust the angle for the next taping, at which time they'll have a better idea for the correction and can make it look more organic

I'm a firm believer in conspiracy theories and isn't it funny how Fat Sam made 3 changes to his palace team as soon as Arsenal scored lol and yup the spuds went on to score and win that game... The Fat Conti??

There is a theory that square bettors are getting more sophisticated, but there is one thing hasn't changed over time: bettors love betting on good teams, no matter what number they are laying.

«Maybe a little bit more focus on ourselves because they changed their manager but we will be strong focused on ourselves and now it makes even more sense to be focused on ourselves, our performance, our set - up and our idea so we can show everything that we have in our head in theory on the grass because of their manager changing.»

Even when he got on the ball he didn't really make anything happen, and it doesn't change the theory that he doesn't work with Firmino and Coutinho.