Sentences with phrase «change theory tells»

The main difference though is that there is a difference in the % increase, and protein change theory tells us that this is important.

Not exact matches

Even though the idea sounded great in theory, there was no telling how two control freaks would handle writing songs together (fans often joke that Saves The Day should change their name to «The Chris Conley Show»).

Or i could point out that the big bang is the biggest joke ever told... That even the top physicists can't figure out how their own theory could work, not to mention the fact that for it to work they would need for the Universe to break the fundamental laws we understand as true since the beginning i.e. (No matter in the Universe can be created nor destroyed, you can only change it's state (solid to liquid, liquid to gas etc.).

Here's the rest of it:»... Reason tells me, that if numerous gradations from a simple and imperfect eye to one complex and perfect can be shown to exist, each grade being useful to its possessor, as is certainly the case; if further, the eye ever varies and the variations be inherited, as is likewise certainly the case; and if such variations should be useful to any animal under changing conditions of life, then the difficulty of believing that a perfect and complex eye could be formed by natural selection, though insuperable by our imagination, should not be considered as subversive of the theory.

Nowhere does it unambiguously teach any of the false theories which, as far as I can tell, would be needed to justify such a change.

Reason tells me, that if numerous gradations from a simple and imperfect eye to one complex and perfect can be shown to exist, each grade being useful to its possessor, as is certain the case; if further, the eye ever varies and the variations be inherited, as is likewise certainly the case; and if such variations should be useful to any animal under changing conditions of life, then the difficulty of believing that a perfect and complex eye could be formed by natural selection, should not be considered as subversive of the theory.»

When heterosexual chauvinists have told homosexuals to change, essentialist theories have provided a ready response: I can't.

generates a «sour» review they could (in theory) change the end of that very show as soon as they read it... the Story NXT tells is set on film (digital file) 4 days to 4 weeks before the Audience sees it, to adjust their sails for that would require back stage re-shoots and post production edits (look at Impact scrambling to re-write their Pre-tape to cover for ADR's release)... easier to let it ride, see if the opinions stay sour, and then IF Needed adjust the angle for the next taping, at which time they'll have a better idea for the correction and can make it look more organic

When he told me of this, I realized we needed to change the term to something more positive, so we came up with AP, since the Attachment Theory literature was so well researched and documented, by John Bowlby and others.»

(i.e. have a theory of change and tell the story for how their donation will solve the problem / achieve your mission!)

Dr. Michael Diamond, an expert on viral immunology, told STAT that dengue experts are focused on the theory that the disease could be playing a role in Zika's apparent change in behavior.

While protein «spread» and «change» theories are both significant I want to focus most of our attention on protein change theory as this has the biggest implications in terms of practical application as well as telling us how our bodies react to protein and amino acids.

Coupling this theory of action with teaching, not telling principals what to do proved to be a powerful strategy for change.

Throughout their time with Teach for America, corps members are frequently told about the organization's «theory of change.»

Because, as Grigely told me, «no archive is disinterested» and in an extension of Joseph Albers» articulations of color theory, «you can't put one document beside another without changing both.»

I think a better term is abrupt climate change — chaos theory merely tells us something about the properties of complex dynamical systems.

Past Speakers Oct 2 - Columbia Professor Todd Gitlin on Fossil Fuel Divestment Oct 3 - Massimo LoBuglio, Environmentalist and Social Entrepreneur Oct 4 - Dr. Radley Horton, Columbia University and co-author of the Obama Administration's Climate Assessment Report Oct 5 - Dr. Jennifer Francis, Rutgers, author of the cutting - edge theory of Arctic Ice Melt and Extreme Weather Oct 9 - Opening Night with climate prophet Dr. James Hansen, NASA scientist, who told Congress in 1988 that global warming had begun Oct 10 — Prof. Andrew Revkin, Pace, plays Climate Music post-show Oct 11 - David Levine - Co-founder and CEO of American Sustainable Business Council Oct 12 - Jaimie Cloud & Griffin Cloud Levine - Teaching Children and Youths Sustainability Oct 16 - Prof. Gerald Markowitz, John Jay College, on industry's relationship to science Oct 17 - Marielle Anzelone, Urban ecologist Oct 18 - Dr. Jannette Barth, Why Not To Frack Oct 19 - Ken Levenson, The Passive House Oct 23 - Prof. Ana Baptista, New School for Social Research, Environmental Justice and Climate Change Oct 24 - Charles Komanoff, Carbon Tax Center, on the need to tax carbon Oct 25 - Prof. Dale Jamieson, NYU, Reason in A Dark Time Oct 26 - Eve Silber and Closing Reception in honor of Father Paul Mayer

The scientists pointed out that the company still supported, for instance, the American Enterprise Institute, whose fellow, Jonah Goldberg, falsely told Fox News in 2014 that it was «utterly fraudulent» that 97 percent of scientists actively doing research into climate change back the theory that it is driven by human activity, mostly fossil fuel use.

To point out just a couple of things: — oceans warming slower (or cooling slower) than lands on long - time trends is absolutely normal, because water is more difficult both to warm or to cool (I mean, we require both a bigger heat flow and more time); at the contrary, I see as a non-sense theory (made by some serrist, but don't know who) that oceans are storing up heat, and that suddenly they will release such heat as a positive feedback: or the water warms than no heat can be considered ad «stored» (we have no phase change inside oceans, so no latent heat) or oceans begin to release heat but in the same time they have to cool (because they are losing heat); so, I don't feel strange that in last years land temperatures for some series (NCDC and GISS) can be heating up while oceans are slightly cooling, but I feel strange that they are heating up so much to reverse global trend from slightly negative / stable to slightly positive; but, in the end, all this is not an evidence that lands» warming is led by UHI (but, this effect, I would not exclude it from having a small part in temperature trends for some regional area, but just small); both because, as writtend, it is normal to have waters warming slower than lands, and because lands» temperatures are often measured in a not so precise way (despite they continue to give us a global uncertainity in TT values which is barely the instrumental's one)-- but, to point out, HadCRU and MSU of last years (I mean always 2002 - 2006) follow much better waters» temperatures trend; — metropolis and larger cities temperature trends actually show an increase in UHI effect, but I think the sites are few, and the covered area is very small worldwide, so the global effect is very poor (but it still can be sensible for regional effects); but I would not run out a small warming trend for airport measurements due mainly to three things: increasing jet planes traffic, enlarging airports (then more buildings and more asphalt — if you follow motor sports, or simply live in a town / city, you will know how easy they get very warmer than air during day, and how much it can slow night - time cooling) and overall having airports nearer to cities (if not becoming an area inside the city after some decade of hurban growth, e.g. Milan - Linate); — I found no point about UHI in towns and villages; you will tell me they are not large cities; but, in comparison with 20-40-60 years ago when they were «countryside», many small towns and villages have become part of larger hurban areas (at least in Europe and Asia) so examining just larger cities would not be enough in my opinion to get a full view of UHI effect (still remembering that it has a small global effect: we can say many matters are due to UHI instead of GW, maybe even that a small part of measured GW is due to UHI, and that GW measurements are not so precise to make us able to make good analisyses and predictions, but not that GW is due to UHI).

Maybe a case can be made that if Exxon had told us decades ago about the speculative theory of human caused climate change from the burning of fossil fuels, then the hijacking of climate science for a political agenda could have commenced earlier?

Climate change skeptics like James Taylor, environmental policy fellow at the Heartland Institute, a conservative think tank, said the pushback in schools and legislatures reflected public frustration at being told «only one side of the global warming debate — the scientifically controversial theory that humans are creating a global warming crisis.»

Read more of Oates» remarks: Economic Times More on Global Climate Change South Dakota Passes Resolution Telling Schools To Teach «Astrological» Theories of Global Warming Texas Board of Ed Neuters Science Textbooks» Global Warming Language

Without getting into the rationale for this, at the moment, can anyone tell me what happens to the rest of the theory if this ratio changes from Miskolczi's value of 2 to the value 2/3?

Besides demonstrating his firm grasp of the power of these various factors to change temperatures, this remarkable matching of theory to real - world data also tells us just how ornery the climate beast may be: the orbital changes that paced the ice ages were incredibly small.

Fortunately the Theory of Constraints (and more recently Eric Reis's book «The Lean Startup») gives us a great way to tell if you're working on the right thing: Make a small change, measure whether the change results in any improvement (to the overall system, not just the specific function), and react accordingly.

I don't have to tell you that both the theory and practice of law are complex and ever - changing.

In theory, this could mean that the FTC will tell Facebook, «Hey, don't do this anymore,» Facebook could say, «Ok, sure,» change its policies, and that's that.

Ted: Turn your scenario around; visualize lying in theory for a change, and tell the truth / be honest and up - front in the real world of real estate transactions / sales for at least a six month trial period, every day, no matter what, and then make your final decision vis a vis the most profitable way of operating... and let us all know the result.