Sentences with phrase «change this problem because»

We're stymied in solving the climate change problem because of an underlying challenge — a communication failure — rooted in language and ideology.

Not exact matches

In my NYT bestselling book, Killing Sacred Cows, I warn people of the 15 major problems of the 401 (k), including: you're not the owner but only the beneficiary of your 401 (k), the government can change the rules at any time, you can't get to the money until 59 1/2, and the fees are typically much higher than most investments out there because you've added complexity and layers of administration and legal fees.

Too many businesses run into serious problems because they waste time trying to make their circumstances fit their plan rather than changing their plan to fit their circumstances.

Often people want to continue working until later in life, but the survey found that 50 % of retirees left the workforce earlier than planned, and of those, 60 % left because of health or disability problems and 27 % because changes in their company such as downsizing or closure.

Many people have theories why Niantic made these changes — some think the game's three - step tracker had a negative impact on the «Pokémon GO» servers, so they shut down the feature until they could fix the problem — but most people are frustrated not just because this crucial feature was removed, but because Niantic hasn't given any kind of official explanation, and has done nothing to calm worried fans.

But the problem is difficult to solve because it's not as easy as changing specific lending criteria.

This is because of too many problems haunting mankind, including climate change and asteroid strike.

We eventually left that particular church group, not entirely because of the pastors or the problems, but also because our general beliefs and desires for how the «church» meets, began to change.

The problem here may be that we professors are all too accustomed to talking, but talk freely only because we are confident that no significant change is really demanded of us.

Macroevolution posed a problem to Darwin because his principle of descent with modification predicts gradual transitions between small - scale adaptive changes in populations and these larger - scale phenomena, yet there is little evidence for such transitions in nature.

You're right though, the system doesn't want to change, and people like me get stoned for saying there's a problem, but because I'm a minority there are plenty of people willing to sign up and embellish the status quo.

I caught her on the way out and had to send her upstairs to change into looser clothes first NOT because I had a problem with what she was wearing (shorts and a tank), but because I sensed that the boy's fundamentalist mother would!

(Whether this is simply because the contextual setting for such engagement has changed, or rather is indicative of more pervasive problems with the old modes themselves, is of course another important enquiry.)

Yet, both became the making of changes in the institutional structure was not his chief concern and because his human vista was limited by the conditions of a simple peasant society east of the Mediterranean in the first century A.D., he obviously could not foresee or make pronouncements upon the vast complex of particular problems that confront Christians in today's world.

Obsessive - compulsive problems are repetitive patterns which can not be changed by reasoning (f) Chronic lying or stealing — A child may lie because he feels trapped between his need for approval and the excessive demands of adults.

It appears in a different form partly because the problem of social continuity has become as great for us as the problem of change and reform, but even more because the historical, cultural character of human existence has come into fuller view.

What I think partially is that «The real problem can not be exposed because then it would have to be dealt with and things would have to change; so it must be protected behind walls of silence (neglect) or by assault (legalistic attack) If you speak about the problem out loud, you ARE the problem.

Tommy God has already forgiven you for your sin the moment you asked Jesus into your life and confessed him as Lord.From that point he paid for your sin in full past present future.It is not sin that stops us from being with the Lord so you are saved.The problem you are experiencing is the battle for your life in the here and now satan is out to destroy you and he knows our weaknesses.If you are honest there were already issues in your life that you struggled with and never got the victory over.So where do you go from here as i found myself in the same situation i was a christian but walking according to the flesh.God does nt change his mind he always loves us but because of our choices we distance ourselves from God.The issue is that we like sin thats our wicked hearts and to be fair we cant change our nature only Christ can do that our old nature must be crucified with Christ.The stumbling block is our pride we have to admit that we cant do it For me that was terribly difficult i was so independent thinking i could do anything but the truth was a made a real mess of things.I sense you are at a crossroads and are feeling desperate and confused.So as a brother in the Lord you need to confess your sin to God and tell him that you are weak -LCB- we all are -RCB- and that you cant do it in your strength -LCB- None of us can -RCB- but ask him to send the holy spirit to help you deal with the temptations and the sin that you struggle with and he will help you to change your life he will empower you as he did me.Rather than look at who you are look to Christ and walk in him and he will make you a new man and sin will not have dominion over you.Jesus came to set us free from bondage.Having once been a slave to sin i know what it is like to have been set free by the power of God and that is what Christ is offering you today.All it takes is a desire to change or repent and admit we cant do it and trust him to give you the strength to walk in him regards brentnz

Then he had to change his remarks, because priests are out of touch buggerers who fled the real world for a host of personal problems.

I haven't posted on here for years because it's like a bad soap opera, same people same theme with the same trolls... so I did something about it but guess what it won't change like you said and you are part of the problem so keep posting and prove me right.

The most casual reading of the Bible suggests that the prophets knew social problems because they knew victims, change agents, and the rest.

If you want to be delusional because you lack the intellectual capacity to understand natural laws or because you are too emotionally fragile to accept reality that is your problem, but it doesn't change the facts.

now I understand the problem why most people can not easily comprehend the reality of God, its because of lack of adequate knowledge of history.But I am optimistic that the process of change or evolution which will take centuries to be realized will be more easy and accelerated in the future, with better educational system.

I will be voting for Romney because Obama has had almost 4 years to try to fix the problems this country has, and he hasn't done a very good job, it is time for a change.

«Currently, we would argue, the key problem with Section 46 is that it would not address this exclusionary behaviour because even companies without market power can have a policy to change locks on a regular basis.»

Sad, because there's a problem in this country, and many people are resistant to positive change.

Some of our players are not average.They'd improve a lot under another manager because they'd be playing with a new better mentality.That's how come when some managers are changed certain players start improving.Arsenal's problem is more of psychological than tactical.We need a change.

but a t some point he lost it, and is not because of his stinginess to buy players, our core is good and has been for sometime now, his biggest problem was adaptation, change to the new EPL, his philosophy dating back 20 years does not work anymore and he knows it, because of this his biggest flaw all others came out to light, lack of rotation of his players favoring some over others, stubbornness that applies to his transfer policy buying for the future just as he had 20 more years ahead, players playing out of their natural positions, ARSENAL FLOPS who knows under other Managers they could have been great, for some reason they were signed in the first place, they must had some talent, best example is Campbell....

and for the major problem which is arsene wenger this man does nt even veiw his opposition let alone construct a tactical plan for them wenger's football ideas are extinct and in all honesty we have a decnt squad, he have seen ferguson do better with less so maybe wenger should bow out for some change because now all other clubs have to do is veiw the swansea game and step up on it and they will cause arsenal problems.

Wengers should have just added a very good DM and another quicker defender to treat those kind of problems but eish he is too stubborn to drop his new captain or Flamini and he had to change the formation to make sure the midfield players defend and attack in numbers with one DM to always protect the defense but this is not happening and Wenger will not change that until maybe 2 or 3 years because he is not under any pressure to do well after all!

I'm so sick of people telling those of us who are disgruntled fans to relax and give this club time to correct itself... for anyone who believes that taking a wait - and - see approach is appropriate at this juncture they should take a good long look at themselves in the mirror because they are a big part of the problem... no other «big» club's fans would stand for this shit for nearly as long as we have... think about it, we've witnessed a changing of the guard at every major club in England, Spain, France and Germany in the last several years because those «big» clubs failed to live up to expectations (Barcelona, Real Madrid, Bayern, PSG, Chelsea, ManU, ManCity etc...)... for some reason, many fans have become as fragile as our current manager, believing that there couldn't possibly be a suitable replacement, even though everyone of these clubs have found multiple replacements and still achieved far more than our club... this mindset has been created by an organization that has been milking it's fans, telling countless lies (no world class players available) and lowering expectations every since they rolled out the biggest lie of all: that we couldn't spend because of the new stadium but once it was paid off we could compete with any team in the world... this organization is rotting from the inside out and if we don't demand that those in charge put soccer first this despicable behaviour won't end with Wenger's ridiculous 2 year contract... I think the real fear isn't that a suitable replacement doesn't exist, but that this organization is so money hungry and poorly mismanaged that we will sink even lower by choosing our next coach the same way they choose our players, on the cheap... even so, we need to see what mustache will do if left to his own devices so he will have to show his true colours... only then can we purge this club and start anew

It is more to do with the tactics than the formation, but the problem is Wenger will NEVER change his tactics, so we might as stick with the 3 -4-3, because every manager knows exactly how to set up against the old 4 -2-3-1 formation.

We are witnessing a vaunted «culture change» episode from Brooklyn, which is interesting because I never felt that team culture was the Nets» problem.

This why signing the likes of Aubameyang, and Mkhitaryan changes absolutely nothing because they'll be coached by the very man who is causing the problems.

Yeah that left a rather sour taste in my mouth too, but the reality of the situation was that most of the players who left the club in the past did so because the constant failure to obtain any sort of silverware... As I have said many times before and will say again, Wenger is the «root of all of Arsenals problems»... yes silent Stan and the board are also contributory... but the fact that they have allowed him in excess of 16 million to spend on teenage boys debunks any myth that suggest his hands are tied... You give me 16 million and I'll bring back a world class player and come back with change.

But however, I do nt think Ramsey is the main culprit, because that problem stated at the begining of 2015 when Coquelin replace Arteta as defensive midfielder Arsenal overall football change from posssession dominance to a sporadic countering style game.

Someone who may not be able to last the final year because of all the life being sucked out of him by this club who lacks any real ambition... Jamie Carragher and all the other critics are right, the whole club from top to bottom needs to change, and some serious questions have to be answered with serious actions, not just talk... Stan Kroenke, Ivan Gazidis, Arsene Wenger, and the other board members need to address this problem or move out.

That might not change even if netminders fall into line, because the rules don't address another problem with leg pads: width.

Not changing manager because it might not solve all problems doesn't seem to be a particular good reason.

As expected by most Arsenal fans and watchers, the manager has rung the changes for the EFL cup match at home to Southampton because of our numerous injury problems and also to allow a few of the key players to get some well earned rest after a hectic fixture schedule.

The problem runs deeper, because lack of change in these spots means the club continuously suffers from the lack of ability of those people to elevate us forward.

Yet, that change couldn't transform Irving into someone new, because that was part of the problem.

I really feel for him.He was treated without respect I remember saying here that our season also depended on him because we knew Welbeck and Giroud were not good enough.However, he came and didn't really impress in the CF role but impressed on the wing but I felt he would've done very well in the Ozil role earlier in the season.He used to be an AMF for Deportivo but they changed him to a CF.This is why I believe he shouldn't have been signed in the first place.It was poor business from Arsenal to sign him because we needed a typical killer CF.Lucas is a more of a No. 10 style kind of player as he played there for Deportivo prior to the season where he played CF.If you look at his style of play you can see that he's not your typical CF.think Wenger benched him because he didn't solve our CF problem but I guess it's not Lucas» fault.

The problem is so far they have been powerless... May be by their own choice because they could easily change the done very quickly.

For me it is a chronically problem because no one from the top management will ask him to do so, and he himself, his pride won't let him step down before his contract run down believing that he still have the quality to perform in higher stage as he did before... I say the fans should have their words... straight at the end of the season, we should all demand changes and I don't really care the way it should be done...

It's all well and good when being able to fill a niche, but you come up against different problems, the wind changes because other teams see it, then you're left wanting.

Expect many more years of sub-top performances, expect Wenger to get a contract extension and most of all don't expect too much to change once Wenger decides to leave because Kroenke is the real problem.

Wenger is the face of Arsenal FC he runs the club from the bottom to the top.Yes the owner and board are to blame of course they are but Wenger is the BIGGEST problem at Arsenal.It's because of his stubbornness, arrogance and crappy ego that Arsenal is where it's today.The 1st and most important change at Arsenal would be with Wenger without a doubt.

There were problems and that doesn't change simply because Chelsea lost.

Just because you're too lazy to use it or too biased to care about using it in this instance, doesn't change that FACT... And you are totally delusional, if you think the fans are going to find a solution to any problem AFC might have, or if I'm influencing any fans decision making process...