Sentences with phrase «change to the law means»

A 2013 change to the law means the boy will not supplant his older sister Charlotte in the order of succession.

A change to the law means that we may not be able to contact you after 25 May 2018 unless you let us know how you'd like to keep in touch.

Not exact matches

«So when Trump says he wants to «open up» libel law, he really means (if he has the slightest knowledge of the law) that he wants to open up — to change — the First Amendment, which, beginning in 1964, has been held to require in cases brought by public figures, proof that what was said was false, and that the newspaper knew or suspected that it was false.

Libel is something that is regulated at the state level, which means that to change it, the president would have to either convince all of the states to change the way they handle libel prosecution or pass a new federal law specifically governing libel.

CNBC reports that buyout firms are racing to strike big deals now, before any tax law changes means their corporate competitors can pay even more for deals.

What this historic change in general solicitation law really means is that if you are an entrepreneur looking to raise money from investors, you might want to spend some quality time with a lawyer before you go shouting it from the rooftops.

The changed legal positions already advanced by Sessions means minority voters looking to prove that the state's strict voter ID law is intentionally discriminatory will probably have to do without the federal government's backing, as will transgender students who argue that the law allows them to use the bathroom that matches their gender identity.

This change in the law preserves the fairness of the incentives to delay, but it means that you can not receive one type of benefit while at the same time earning a bonus for delaying the other benefit.

She started to see that a career in law could mean righting wrongs and changing the systems that continued to hold certain populations back.

Also, the higher thresholds for the Alternative Minimum Tax («AMT») mean that many taxpayers who had to add back deductions for state and local taxes to determine their tax due may not have to pay the AMT, but the new law «caps» those deductions so the end result may be a small change for those taxpayers.

(As an aside, equilibrium means «no tendency to change,» fiat means deriving its value from law rather than some underlying commodity backing, and fractional reserve means that banks hold only a fraction of deposits on reserve, loaning the rest out.).

The foregoing change is material, as it means that private / internal, centralized blockchains are given the same favorable status as public blockchains under the law, and may even leave a backdoor for legacy systems like encrypted Credit Card records stored multiple times to qualify as a «blockchain.»

The Law stays the same, the means of salvation and being able to keep it has changed because Jesus goes on to say that» unless your righteousness exceed that of the scribes and Pharisees, ye likewise shall in no wise enter into the Kingdom of Heaven.»

Experience, however, soon showed in what way they were to become the most dangerous; that the insufficiency of the means provided for their removal gave them a freehold and irresponsibility in office; that their decisions, seeming to concern individual suitors only, pass silent and unheeded by the public at large; that these decisions, nevertheless, become law by precedent, sapping, by little and little, the foundations of the consti.tution, and working its change by construction, before any one has perceived that that invisible and helpless worm has been busily employed in consuming its substance.

You can disparage the Supreme Court justices all you want and it will not change the fact that sodomy laws are unconstitutional in the United State of America meaning that it is unconstitutional to pass laws that make homosexuality illegal.

Though the Church can, for example, abolish certain existing prohibiting impediments to marriage, of purely ecclesiastical law, if it considers this advisable in the changed situation of today, it by no means follows that it would be equally possible for the Church to revalidate and sanction any invalid marriage whatever, if the Church were only rather more liberal and understanding.

Or is the term relative — meaning that something that is a to'ebah to one person may not be offensive to another, or something that is a to'ebah in one culture may not be offensive in another, or something that is a to'ebah in one generation or time period may not be offensive in another — in which case the law may change as people's perceptions change?

many christians (but by no means all) in this country are behaving like the taliban and trying to change the laws and education to force the christian religion down everyone's throats.

People say things like «God never changes» but his methods of engaging with humanity have certainly changed, from the extreme of the Levitical law with all its focus on foods, hygiene etc, to the point where we now have 2 laws — loving God and loving others, and the example of Jesus to show us what that means in practice.

The rule of law, then, does not mean that the people should follow only the established codes, remaining respectfully obedient to them and never criticizing or changing them.

However, if you have some means to predict which will and won't have children, then let us have it and I'll support your efforts to change the laws to exclude these couples from the tax breaks.

And Martin what I meant was that you should fight to get laws changed, not necessarily to stop people from believing.

So how does the interpretation of the law change from what we perceive it to mean, now?

It's time to think about what the change in the law means: what are the implications for churches?

I just mean that maybe Christians can compromise by acknowledging that laws evolve and change and to accept that gays want the same rights as married people and to be respectful of that and maybe gays can compromise by not insisting to use the word «marriage» but instead use the word «union» or some other word or phrase to describe their relationship.

I have had a change of heart on this and i believe that jesus means what he says for us to go and sin no more.Why because the women caught in adultery is us it is a universal message for us sinners judged and condemned by the law if we do nt want to be under the law then the only way is to follow jesus but not according to the flesh but according to the spirit.Because if we walk in the spirit we will not gratify the desires of the flesh.Which means we will not sin that sums up the message once having been saved by jesus we follow him and walk by the spirit the message is clear and he provides the means for us to do it through his holy spirit.For sin shall not have dominion over us we are more than conquerers overcomers through Jesus Christ.

Of course we wish to treat people with compassion and encouragement, even when they are in objectively sinful or irregular states of life, but this does not mean that we can blithely set aside the law of God and change the Lord's own doctrine on marriage.

He said: «We're going to need to change by virtue a humanised political debate over exactly what we want to see in our country, that means changing the law, it is also changing the culture so people view abortion as what it is, destruction of an unborn child.»

A fundamental law of relational theory is that when any part of a system changes, the entire system — meaning all other parts — will be forced to change in response.

And in an Indian situation where baptism is the legal mark of change of one religious community to another, each with its own civil codes recognized by the Courts, communalisation of church life is imposed by Law and perverts the meaning of baptism as sacrament of faith.

Like most UN human rights treaties, its implementation by state parties is overseen by a compliance committee, the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women, which issues «General Comments» meant to guide our understanding of the provisions contained in the treaty, and which conducts periodic reviews of state parties, instructing them how to change their laws in order to comply better with the treaty, as understood by the Committee.

But Moses, while living as a favored son - in - law in the home of Jethro, is confronted and the course of his life radically changed by «Yahweh,» a name previously unknown to Moses but referring in very meaning to the One God.

Read more: Why do so many people misinterpret Acts 10:15 to mean it is okay to eat pork when it really teaching a lesson and not changing food laws?

incorporate changing social norms around what marriage means and to embrace a variety of different «meanings» of marriage without writing any one meaning into our laws

State legislatures may not be in session, which means it would be impractical for them to change their laws this quickly.

And by governance on a daily basis, mean from the how from kings, aristocrats, down through every layer of bureaucracy till you get to your local tax collector, what / why / how these people ran the government administration on a day to day basis, from dealing with a rival city who recently stole one of your citizens crops, to pirates interfering with trade on the Mediterranean, to drought, city administration, what to do with tax money, neighborly disputes, superstition, weather, crime, theft, laws and battles of ideology, to political rivalries and infighting, to a foreigner spreading strange religious ideas in the city (or dealing with somebody accused of a crime they claim they did not commit), I mean everything and everything these officials may have dealt with, daily, and how they changed over time.

@PoloHoleSet In Germany, one very rich man tried to get a law change so that in cases of large amounts of shares inherited, inheritance tax could be paid in shares, and not in cash - which would force the heirs to sell large amounts of shares, which would make the price drop, which would mean they have to sell a larger percentage of shares than the inheritance tax.

Other changes to the existing law will mean people with mental illness will no longer have to prove their condition is clinically well - recognised in order to be covered by the DDA, and local authorities and private members» clubs will be legally obliged to treat disabled people equally.

Statutory instruments mean you can quickly get a change to the law through parliament without the usual standards of debate and scrutiny.

What I mean is that the UK would like to see a particular rule of international law and the only way in which it can see a change in the law is to insist that it's position is already the law!

Contentious measures are often packaged together in the budget, meaning that a large portion of the stand - alone bills are completely uncontroversial and consist of minor changes to law.

That's going to mean changes for legislative body of government that, along with the Assembly, makes laws and approves the budget for New York state.

Stymied in their efforts to get the Legislature and Gov. Andrew Cuomo to go along with their idea, these advocates see a convention of delegates brought together to consider changes to the constitution as a means to loosen marijuana laws.

Changes to immigration laws to create a «hostile environment» for illegal immigrants have also meant that although they have the right to live in the UK, some people have also been refused jobs, healthcare and benefits.

I meant that there would be quite simple ways of changing the law to make the way back possible.

Assembly Ways and Means Committee chairman, Rep. John Macco, says the mission for the rest of the session is to study tax - law changes.

I mean, it was a very, if I may say so, very intelligent analysis of what was wrong with Conservative employment law and how we were going to change it.

Also note that currently the number of members of the House of Representatives is fixed; adding a new state means automatically eliminating at least one representative seat from an existing state (unless congress enacts a law to change this).

It made sense to change a law that penalized well - meaning voters wrongly instructed by their own elections commissioners.

Legislator Wolfe stated that the amendments were meant to clarify the purpose of the existing law and make necessary technical changes.