Sentences with phrase «changed as evidenced»

That has obviously changed as evidenced by this video.

That's starting to change as evidenced by comments J.P. Morgan Chase (jpm) Chief Operating Officer Matt Zames made to the Journal.

«Promoting» means being active and not passive: the statutory equality body and inspectorates will look for action and positive change as evidence of compliance.

«However, this may change as the evidence base for these policies grows and changes in public knowledge increase calls for stronger governmental action.

Although it was first seen in the 1940s to be the evolutionary glue that held species together, and thus a significant evolutionary force, a few decades later when quantitative data on gene flow in plant populations began being collected, this view changed as evidence seemed to indicate that gene flow was not all that significant.

This changes as evidence accrues.

Many scientists viewed the changes as evidence of an ongoing climate shift, raising concerns about the effects of global warming on the Arctic.

Check out 100 % of movies made about climate change as evidence.

The opinions on climate change from analysts, researchers, and academics continue to change as the evidence of global warming - or lack thereof - is presented.

Not exact matches

Decades of scientific investigation across multiple lines of evidence corroborate a powerful yet inconvenient truth: Human - caused global warming and climate change is real, and it's briskly accelerating as we dump more carbon into the atmosphere.

«It's not as though there's been some sudden change or anything like that, but all of the evidence continues to accumulate,» he said.

Regulatory changes had been in the wind for some time as the evidence against the program built up, yet employers relied on the lobbying efforts of the Canadian Federation of Independent Business to maintain the program rather than taking steps to improve domestic recruitment and training efforts or adjust wages and benefits to attract workers.

The 33 - year - old billionaire instead insists that the real mistakes that were made by Cambridge Analytica happened years ago and that Facebook's 2014 policy change served as evidence that the social network had already taken steps to ensure that app developers didn't harvest and exploit too much user data.

As usual, investors hoping for an «annual forecast» for 2009 will have to find it elsewhere, since our investment positions focus on prevailing conditions of valuation and market action, and we shift our stance as the evidence changeAs usual, investors hoping for an «annual forecast» for 2009 will have to find it elsewhere, since our investment positions focus on prevailing conditions of valuation and market action, and we shift our stance as the evidence changeas the evidence changes.

As I've said before, you don't have to forecast the future direction of the wind - you just need to regularly adjust the sails as the evidence changeAs I've said before, you don't have to forecast the future direction of the wind - you just need to regularly adjust the sails as the evidence changeas the evidence changes.

It's enough to monitor and respond to conditions under which a collapse is most likely to occur, and align ourselves with the evidence as it changes.

Small rate changes or more evidence of earnings and capacity to pay is also unlikely to impact on high net worth buyers, which is typically defined as those with assets worth more than $ 2m in addition to their home.

To date, there is little evidence of problems or excesses, but this could change as the recovery proceeds.

Everything else, including politics and monetary policy, will filter through those observables, and our outlook will shift as the observable evidence changes.

As with climate change, we have ample evidence that we're facing a biodiversity crisis, we know what's causing it and we have numerous solutions.

We define «anticipate» as evidence of a systematic relationship between points at which the normalized slope of the ten - day average P / C changes sign and points at which the normalized slope of the S&P 500 index changes sign in the same direction.

This year, shareholders will have an opportunity to weigh in on the eventual changes amidst a backdrop of continued multi-billion dollar settlements for allegations of misconduct regarding a litany of issues (including the «London Whale» trading fiasco, evidence of collusion to rig CDS and foreign exchange markets, and continued mortgage - backed security litigation), along with the Fed and FDIC's decision to label the Company's «living will» proposal as «not credible.»

Those shifts of internal market action don't always have immediate consequences, and they have to be constantly monitored as the evidence changes.

While the GGP transaction is the best evidence we have in terms of «A» mall pricing, Floris van Dijkum, an analyst with Boenning & Scattergood, explains that «' A» malls are currently undervalued in the public markets, but sentiment can change as it has in the past.»

That may change, and we'll take the evidence as it arrives.

Underlining the lack of evidence for a rate rise, communicating that any change in policy would not come as a surprise or ahead of schedule, and forecasting weaker US growth thanks in part to the strong dollar had its desired effect: but not for long.

The paper hypothesize that the change occurred because the Federal Open Market Committee switched from using the federal funds rate as an operating instrument to using it to implement monetary policy and presents evidence from a variety of sources supporting the hypothesis.

We'll change our outlook as the evidence changes.

The biggest risk here is dramatic changes to the pricing structure on US drug prices with yesterday's announced partnership between Amazon, Berkshire and JPMorgan to change health care as evidence of change to come in the US.

Nothing goes up forever and it is important to remain flexible and open - minded as conditions change and new evidence presents itself.

The February 2018 decrease in applications for both conventional and government purchase mortgages as well as any changes in credit standards, a metric of mortgage supply, will be closely tracked for evidence of a longer declining trend.

As evidenced by the entire span of available historical data, the elevation of profit margins is directly related — not only in overall level, but also in their point - to - point change over time — to the sum of government and household saving.

Dawkins argues that while there appear to be plenty of individuals that would place themselves as «1» due to the strictness of religious doctrine against doubt, most atheists do not consider themselves «7» because atheism arises from a lack of evidence and evidence can always change a thinking person's mind.

If it's all just alternate explanations that work with the evidence, I would much prefer people change their theory to meet the facts (as the Dalai Lama, for instance, recommends) than keep going with some simplistic idea of «faith».

Science can only be used as evidence for that which exists if people are willing to believe in facts, and are willing to have their understandings shaped and nuanced and developed — yes, even changed — as science reveals more and more intricate information.

It is almost impossible to know if Christians would change their thinking if absolute evidence was presented as only one responded, but I would venture to guess that he is probably fairly representative, and no amount of knowledge or evidence would change their opinions.

The fossil record which shows millions of years of stable species, then an explosion of necessarily mutations, all occurring at the precise necessary time required for complex organisms to develop, and ALL escaping fossilization «the sudden appearance of most species in the geologic record and the lack of evidence of substantial gradual change in most species — from their initial appearance until their extinction — has long been noted, including by Charles Darwin who appealed to the imperfection of the record as the favored explanation» — Wikipedia

Furthermore, there is certainly enough evidence in the discrepant personalities of the OT v. NT deity to indicate a «changing nature,» i.e., one who sees no other option but to destroy humanity and then later destroy entire civilizations as opposed to one who prefers the option of alleged self - sacrifice coupled to a merciful «grace» for those who are willing to just believe in the sacrifice.

At this point as far as the earth is round question we consider that answer so refined and mounted in evidence that we can say it is indeed a fact at this point and will never change until an event takes place that actually changes it shape.

If the prayer group in the experiment suddenly, in controvention of known medical timelines, demonstrated that they were as they were prior to the diesease, surgery, injury etc, and subsequent testing provides no evidence of anything other than a straight up non medical intervention based change in their biology, THEN the results might be remarkable.

The proliferation of communication technologies, the changing structure of everyday life (due largely to technology), the growing complexity of family life, the changing understandings and norms of sexual conduct and the expansion of consumer culture (as evidenced by unprecedented levels of consumer debt) are only a few of the conditions that present pastors with new kinds of demands.

What atheists believe does not change the presence as evidenced by the affect (yes, even effect of presence).

That we must disbelieve scientific evidence, that certain people, such as Gays, are condemned, or that your whole life must change, and your whole view of the world must change.

But evolution is more than change, and every theory accepts as evidence only what fits the theory.

I show that faith doesn't actually allow for blind leaps, but instead, our beliefs change as we are persuaded and convinced by the evidence presented to us.

Evidence that's genuinely convincing will propagate just like the idea that the earth orbits the sun — at first, almost nobody believed it, but as more and better evidence was found, more and more people changed their minds until now practically everyone agrees that the earth orbits the sun, even though this is diametrically opposed to people's beliefs a few centurEvidence that's genuinely convincing will propagate just like the idea that the earth orbits the sun — at first, almost nobody believed it, but as more and better evidence was found, more and more people changed their minds until now practically everyone agrees that the earth orbits the sun, even though this is diametrically opposed to people's beliefs a few centurevidence was found, more and more people changed their minds until now practically everyone agrees that the earth orbits the sun, even though this is diametrically opposed to people's beliefs a few centuries ago.

We can not even argue that it is possible that the story changed as the tradition lost contact with the Palestinian countryside, because the T.R. reading in Matthew is evidence that the difficulty was felt in the tradition.

It isn't true that scientists are trying to change the beliefs of others, but rather they are observing and testing natural phenomena with tomes of evidence telling the rational person that the notion of a deity as a NATURAL being rather than SUPERNATURAL one is absurd and silly.

I do nt usually argue with fellow believers, but in this case I would point out that there is no scriptural evidence that Adam changed physically as a result of the fall (by adding genitalia)

The evidence for this phenomenon is incontestable: the influx of non «SBC evangelical scholars into Baptist seminaries; the changing of the name of the Baptist Sunday School Board to the more generic LifeWay Christian Resources; the presence and high profile of non «Baptist leaders on SBC platforms, e.g., the closing message at the 1998 SBC delivered by Dr. James Dobson, a Nazarene; the aggressive participation of the SBC's Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission as an advocate for the conservative side of the culture wars conflict; new patterns of cooperation between SBC mission boards and evangelical ministries such as Promise Keepers, Campus Crusade for Christ, the National Association of Evangelicals, Prison Fellowship, and World Vision.