Sentences with phrase «changes in a scientific way»

My advice is that if you have researched enough about your issue then go ahead and experiment with it and make adequate the changes in a scientific way.

Not exact matches

Perhaps it is now time to recognize that the third world - changing scientific achievement of the last century is not the unmitigated good that much of Western culture claims it is — and that treating the sexual revolution as a unambiguous, indeed undeniable, boon to humanity can lead to a lot of personal unhappiness, homicidal ghouls like Kermit Gosnell, and the deployment of coercive state power in ways that threaten civil society and democracy.

Without pretending to be scientific about it, the world may be imagined to be a vast collection of existences — things and substances of various compositions and kinds — each of which is what it is, and moves, changes, grows, or decays as it does by reason of its relation to other things: things existing in various ways by, and in some cases, at the expense of, or on, other things.

«In light of [the] would - be scientific intellectual model, matters of faith appear as archaic... This way of thinking... has changed man's basic orientation towards reality.

If you can find a way to prove to me that fusion doesn't fuel the sun, I can change my scientific belief structure, that is what allows me to say I live in reality while you float in the clouds with your invisible friend.

Finding Your Way Around the French Research System With the recent changes in the French research system, French scientists may have to wait a bit longer for employment stability, and foreign scientists will have new ways of looking for opportunities to join the French scientific community.

«We were looking for projects that could really represent breakthroughs — those that could really change the way we think,» Jack Dixon, HHMI's vice president and chief scientific officer, wrote in the Collaborative Innovation Awards announcement.

The media industry is changing in ways that make it difficult to predict the future of science writing, says Mariette DiChristina, president of NASW and executive editor of Scientific American.

Eliene Augenbraun, multimedia managing editor for Scientific American and Nature Research Group publications, said the story «invites kids to participate in experiments that change the way you think about your own life.»

Rather, these observers call for changes in the way that the U.S. staffs and funds its academic laboratories in order to restore the incentives that formerly attracted many of the brightest young Americans to seek careers in research and contribute to maintaining the nation's longstanding scientific and technical preeminence.

Copelli thinks building a scientific culture in northeastern Brazil will require changes in several areas: the way students are taught, the way faculty members deal with funding agencies, and the federal laws and rules that govern hiring.

The research, published in the journal Scientific Reports, shows for the first time that the way in which fat is made within the body is not «pre-programmed» during the early years of development as previously thought but even in adulthood cells can be influenced by our environment to change the type of fat that is formed.

Nevertheless, Physica, Aristotle's treatise on the nature of motion, change, and time, stands out because in it he presented a systematic way of studying the natural world — one that held sway for two millennia and led to modern scientific method.

«The people who get lots of grants are by and large brilliant people doing really good work,» says Ross McKinney, chief scientific officer for the Association of American Medical Colleges in Washington, D.C. «We'd really like to see the details because we could change the incentives in ways that are not constructive if we are not careful.»

It's just amazing that, you know, you could capture that much information and it's interesting in the scientific perspective because what we are finding right now with issues like climate change and conservation is that we really need fine - grained samples from very large geographic areas to really understand the dynamics of species range movements and how fragmentation is occurring and many biogeographic questions, and literally, the only way we can do this is through voluntary networks like this because it would cost billions and billions to send professionals out at that finer scale to understand it.

«We demonstrated a seemingly simple — but in fact sophisticated — way to create LED lights that change in a natural way to a cozy, warm white color when dimmed,» said Hugo Cornelissen, a principal scientist in the Optics Research Department at Philips Research Eindhoven, a corporate scientific research entity owned by the company Royal Philips in the Netherlands.

They will be providing them with new skills which can transform their scientific ideas in a new way and help them be different and more adaptable to the changing conditions of our dynamic world.

In their tightly controlled experiments they made metals bubble, change colors, and grow sparkling filaments, and they did it over and over again, establishing, in a crude way, the foundations of scientific experimentatioIn their tightly controlled experiments they made metals bubble, change colors, and grow sparkling filaments, and they did it over and over again, establishing, in a crude way, the foundations of scientific experimentatioin a crude way, the foundations of scientific experimentation.

A recently published research study in the scientific journal Nature introduces a treatment paradigm, stimulating the production of myelin, which may change the way MS is treated.

But a new study published in the journal Nature Scientific Reports reinforces this idea that climate change is altering the world's weather - making wind conveyor belts in a way that favors extreme and long - lasting weather anomalies.

Finally, the scientific approaches to the analysis of samples is changing all the time: that is that options are increasing all the time and the treatment options are changing all the time so large scale studies set up to recruit sufficient patients and test them in a particular way must be «future proofed» so that the results stand the test of time.

They address the need to improve climate awareness and understanding of how climate protection and development can support each other, as well as reducing carbon emissions in a credible way», stated Suzane Kahn, the president of the Scientific Committee of the Brazilian Panel on Climate Change.

Though the APS statement about climate change is more nuanced than the AAAS letter, stating — for example — «scientific challenges remain in our abilities to observe, interpret, and project climate change,» it in no way disputes the scientific consensus on climate change or the risks it poses.

Global climate models are the scientific community's best tools for understanding the detailed dynamics of the global climate system and the way those dynamics change in response to greenhouse gas emissions and other human activities.

In the same way that creationists urge schools to «teach the controversy,» climate change skeptics aim to sow doubt about scientific consensus, said Mark McCaffrey, the programs and policy director of the National Center for Science Education, a nonprofit that has long supported the teaching of evolution in schools and recently began to defend climate change educatioIn the same way that creationists urge schools to «teach the controversy,» climate change skeptics aim to sow doubt about scientific consensus, said Mark McCaffrey, the programs and policy director of the National Center for Science Education, a nonprofit that has long supported the teaching of evolution in schools and recently began to defend climate change educatioin schools and recently began to defend climate change education.

Dave: Many people in the biohacking community have had trouble with how much they overpay their life insurance provider because these companies haven't caught up with new scientific studies that have changed the way different diet types and exercises are viewed by the scientific community.

Backed by scientific research, chlorogenic acid changes the way glucose is absorbed in the body, which may result in weight loss, as well as many other health benefits.

Flush with just over $ 11 million in capital, Academia is inching closer to its goal of publishing all scientific papers while simultaneously changing the way the peer - review porcess works.

Scientific developments were rapidly changing the context of contemporary life and Yves Klein believed that as an artist the only way forward was to create a new realm for artistic exploration that reconnected people to the sublime rather than dwell in nihilistic emotion or existential angst.

The changes may be the result of the way we mix distinct hues at the back of our eyes, but that scientific fact is not something we are overly conscious of in our daily lives.

We identify several ways in which the scientists achieved flexibility in maintaining the same numbers for climate sensitivity while accommodating changing scientific ideas.

This represents the scientific view of the time, those garbled versions that appeared in the press of the time don't change that but they are what is remembered, similar misrepresentation goes on to day and is a very unreliable way to find out what the scientific view is on any subject.

The scientific question is when will the Arctic be free of ice (not whether, although it's possible that it will not be — if human activities change in a way not reflected in any of the models).

* The role of the US in global efforts to address pollutants that are broadly dispersed across national borders, such as greenhouse gasses, persistent organic pollutants, ozone, etc...; * How they view a president's ability to influence national science policy in a way that will persist beyond their term (s), as would be necessary for example to address global climate change or enhancement of science education nationwide; * Their perspective on the relative roles that scientific knowledge, ethics, economics, and faith should play in resolving debates over embryonic stem cell research, evolution education, human population growth, etc... * What specific steps they would take to prevent the introduction of political or economic bias in the dissemination and use of scientific knowledge; * (and many more...)

I agree with Olson, utterly, that there's not enough experimentation, too much fear of failure and also far too much fear and misunderstanding at scientific institutions, from America's universities to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, about the obligation and responsibility to engage the public in a sustained way.

Only people with a scientific bent or a strong existing interest in climate change will make it more than half the way through.

Having defined climate change in scientific («informational»») terms, we end up neglecting the myriad of other ways in which people frame climate.

Concerning the «debate» highlighted by the above exchanges between Pielke and Holdren, the issue isnt about analogues to past droughts (which, by the way, the California resource managers were more interested in), but about the scientific evidence that California droughts have become more severe due to climate change.

The terminology that the IPCC uses — such as «virtually certain», «very likely», «likely» etcetera and the very careful definitions that are attached to them, are an excellent way of communicating the uncertainties around various aspects of climate change, and are a significant improvement over the traditional way of discussing uncertainties in the scientific literature.

Saying that CO2 is the likely cause of future change to the environment and saying that mitigating CO2 or adapting to CO2 is the only known way to meet these challenges is a perfectly logical and scientific stance to take, according the current state of risk shown in the literature.

In no way do my values suggest that debate should be curtailed: I merely insist that a scientific debate should take place in the scientific literature and that the public be put in a position where it can make an informed judgment about the voices that are opposing mainstream science on crucial issues ranging from climate change to vaccinatioIn no way do my values suggest that debate should be curtailed: I merely insist that a scientific debate should take place in the scientific literature and that the public be put in a position where it can make an informed judgment about the voices that are opposing mainstream science on crucial issues ranging from climate change to vaccinatioin the scientific literature and that the public be put in a position where it can make an informed judgment about the voices that are opposing mainstream science on crucial issues ranging from climate change to vaccinatioin a position where it can make an informed judgment about the voices that are opposing mainstream science on crucial issues ranging from climate change to vaccination.

But I share MacCracken's view that this is the not forum for a full - blown debate — and that the «debate» format in general, pitting two «sides» against each other, is not the best way to assess the state of scientific understanding of climate change.

Pew Research Center has asked Americans about their perception of the scientific consensus on climate change in different ways over the years.

«The study also showed us how important it is to maintain a comprehensive measurement network and to develop and use scientific methods that help us distinguish the changes from the natural variation in climate in a reliable way», Laine explains.

With all the interest in alleged misdeeds of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and hacked email exchanges among climate scientists, it is easy to lose track of the compelling strands of scientific evidence that have led almost all climate scientists to conclude that mankind is altering climate in potentially dangerous ways.

Climate change can affect our lives in drastic ways and has been a topic of interest to the scientific community for longer than you might realize.

There's a debate to be had about the science, there's a debate to be had about the best way to approach the problem of climate change and how big that problem is, in the light of — but not as a consequence of — the best scientific information available.

The point I'm trying to make is the real possibility (supported by many scientific research mentioned above) that by the FF input, the system itself changes in such a way that it releases extra CO2 on its own, even without additional FF input, until a new stable system has evolved (one not preferable by humas..)

The findings are important from a scientific perspective, Swain says, because little change versus huge swings in extremes suggests something really different about the way the atmosphere is responding to warming.

If Obama takes the position that legislation can be negotiated without regard to whether its supporters believe in the scientific evidence or not, if he brings to the bully pulpit no serious vocabulary on climate change, no gravitas on climate science, then how likely is it that he will lead government and society to deal with the problem in a «comprehensive» way?