Figure 2 shows
changes in albedo calculated in Palle 2004 from reconstructed satellite data (black line) and Earthshine measurements (blue line).
Not exact matches
However, even a smaller figure (I had
calculated about 0.17 W / m ^ 2 based on your inflated figure for total planetary
albedo, but you can check it out) is still significant when compared with the total flux imbalance, which I think is a more informative comparison than an arbitrarily selected
change in cloud cover, because it compares the sea ice reduction with the effects of all climate variations that have been operating
in recent years..
«his refusal to
calculate a total year energy balance» - At this stage, no such calculation can be made, because I have
calculated in detail only the
changes in the incoming energy (the insolation) as a function of time - of - year and latitude; I have estimated also the effect upon the insolation absorption through a
change in the Arctic
albedo.
Albedo change due to LGM — Holocene vegetation change, much of which is inherent with ice sheet area change, and albedo change due to coastline movement are lumped together with ice sheet area change in calculating the surface albedo climate fo
Albedo change due to LGM — Holocene vegetation
change, much of which is inherent with ice sheet area
change, and
albedo change due to coastline movement are lumped together with ice sheet area change in calculating the surface albedo climate fo
albedo change due to coastline movement are lumped together with ice sheet area
change in calculating the surface
albedo climate fo
albedo climate forcing.
The great thing is that, since we can make good estimates of the
changes in solar radiation,
changes in the Earth's
albedo due to melting ice, and
changes in atmospheric CO2 concentration during the ice ages, scientists can directly
calculate the sensitivity of the climate to
changes in the atmospheric CO2 concentration.