Sentences with phrase «changes in law quite»

Not exact matches

In the wake of the PPF report, Liberal government sources were telling some reporters in Ottawa that election - law changes are on the way, quite likely in line with what's suggested in this latest reporIn the wake of the PPF report, Liberal government sources were telling some reporters in Ottawa that election - law changes are on the way, quite likely in line with what's suggested in this latest reporin Ottawa that election - law changes are on the way, quite likely in line with what's suggested in this latest reporin line with what's suggested in this latest reporin this latest report.

Sexual orientation has been the focal point for quite some time for special attention in law to overcome disadvantage (real or alleged) for those with attraction to persons of the same sex; and now, increasingly those who wish to change sex or dress as a person of the opposite sex.

And it should at once be noted also that as long as such a Church law is in existence, the character of its obligation, the possibility of being excused or dispensed from it, the possibility of discussing its expediency or the need to change it, the possibility of knowing oneself not bound by it in a particular concrete case etc., are of quite a different kind from any case in which an immutable divine commandment is involved.

Didn't he cave in a couple of years ago after taking thousands of dollars from NYSUT and vote with a «heavy heart» for a budget that included changes in the teacher evaluation law that quite severely tied teacher ratings to test scores?

One country that used to have the religion on its national ID card until quite recently (the law changed in 2000, new ID cards without religion were issued from 2005 on) is Greece.

The law was actually changed quite a few years ago, back in 2009.

Since Kiplinger's first wrote about tax law changes concerning state - sponsored college - savings plans in 2001, readers have asked quite a few questions about how to pick the best plan, how to choose between a Coverdell Education Savings Account and a 529 plan and how to enroll.

The piece spends quite a bit of time, appropriately on the fascinating work of Dan Kahan, the Yale law professor who is a leader of the ongoing «Cultural Cognition» research project and was the focus of my piece on how one can choose a Nobel Prize winner in physics to suit just about any view on human - driven climate change.

Henry's law for small changes in temperature is quite linear.

What is law today may change, he adds, and while it's quite unusual for legislation to change overnight, and in - house counsel should have a process in place to keep on top of any changes.

[3] For a history of the Statute, see W. S. Holdsworth, A History of English Law Volume VI (Methuen & Co), 379 - 397; Holdsworth considered the Statute was out of date when he wrote this text, at 396: «the prevailing feeling both in the legal and the commercial world is, and has for a long time been, that these clauses have outlived their usefulness, and are quite out of place amid the changed legal and commercial conditions of to - day»; see also E. Rabel, «The Statute of Frauds and Comparative Legal History», L.Q.Rev., 63 (1947), 174 - 187.

Robert A. Wallner of Milberg LLP, who filed an amicus brief for labor organizations, called the decision «a landmark change in the law,» and said that «the ramifications of this decision are quite extraordinary.»

In all likelihood, the pressures on the industry accumulated over many years, and merely exploded all at once due to a crack in competitive pressure to keep rates low, and quite possibly due to major tax law changes around that time that may have disrupted the status quIn all likelihood, the pressures on the industry accumulated over many years, and merely exploded all at once due to a crack in competitive pressure to keep rates low, and quite possibly due to major tax law changes around that time that may have disrupted the status quin competitive pressure to keep rates low, and quite possibly due to major tax law changes around that time that may have disrupted the status quo.

Mr. Sirota offers quite a bit to chew on in just over 1000 words, but his argument, as I understand it, boils down to the following propositions: 1) Judges must generally apply the law as written and should work to foster stable legal doctrine, 2) In applying the law, judges can not avoid making moral and value - laden judgments; and 3) Judicial moralizing is, to a certain extent, desirable due to «democratic process failures,» meaning that the legislative process is not properly responding to the changing will of the people (Mr. Sirota also discusses briefly the circumstances in which courts should be permitted to overrule precedentin just over 1000 words, but his argument, as I understand it, boils down to the following propositions: 1) Judges must generally apply the law as written and should work to foster stable legal doctrine, 2) In applying the law, judges can not avoid making moral and value - laden judgments; and 3) Judicial moralizing is, to a certain extent, desirable due to «democratic process failures,» meaning that the legislative process is not properly responding to the changing will of the people (Mr. Sirota also discusses briefly the circumstances in which courts should be permitted to overrule precedentIn applying the law, judges can not avoid making moral and value - laden judgments; and 3) Judicial moralizing is, to a certain extent, desirable due to «democratic process failures,» meaning that the legislative process is not properly responding to the changing will of the people (Mr. Sirota also discusses briefly the circumstances in which courts should be permitted to overrule precedentin which courts should be permitted to overrule precedents.

Yet, in speaking with Big Law consultants and managers, there seems to be quite a hesitancy among partners to adopt necessary changes.

If there are multiple collaborators (quite possible in a law firm setting), each person gets their own color, and every change is color - coded based on the editor.

This seems like quite a change in the law.

[FN5] However, it is one thing to change the law or the rules at a formal level but quite another to achieve the real goals of reform in daily practice.

There have actually been some quite recent changes to the way that Texas Child Custody Laws have been set down in the statute books, with major changes in September 2007 signalling a whole raft of over 300 different alterations that impacted on everything from child custody arrangements to visitation rights for each of the parents, and exactly how those rights would be enshrined in law.

Family law is quite complicated and changes regularly — it's too difficult to dabble in it on the side.