There is a variety of physical processes that can contribute to
changes in ocean volume, including tectonic activity, undersea eruptions of magma and thermal vents, and silt deposition.
Even very small
changes in ocean volume add up to a lot of sea level rise.
Not exact matches
Ocean volume is a significant factor
in sea - level
change, Horton said.
The
ocean conveyor system, Rutgers scientists believe,
changed at the same time as a major expansion
in the
volume of the glaciers
in the northern hemisphere as well as a substantial fall
in sea levels.
The past climates that forced these
changes in ice
volume and sea level were reconstructed mainly from temperature - sensitive measurements
in ocean cores from around the globe, and from ice cores.
Positive energy content
change means an increase
in stored energy (i.e., heat content
in oceans, latent heat from reduced ice or sea ice
volumes, heat content
in the continents excluding latent heat from permafrost
changes, and latent and sensible heat and potential and kinetic energy
in the atmosphere).
Writing
in Nature Climate
Change, two scientists from the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK) say the melting of quite a small
volume of ice on the East Antarctic shore could ultimately trigger a discharge of ice into the
ocean which would result
in unstoppable sea - level rise for thousands of years ahead.
The latter is almost linearly related to
changes in ice sheet
volume; the former, however, is influenced by a range of factors, including atmosphere /
ocean dynamics and
changes in Earth's gravitational field, rotation, and crustal and the mantle deformation associated with the redistribution of mass between land ice and the
ocean.
It seems to me that they must show deeper mixing than 50 M, since there is not enough mass
in the upper 50 meters of
ocean to account for the annual heat storage
changes that are implied by observations for the the full integrated 700 meter
volume of
ocean.
The
changes in volume over a season also tell us how much ice is produced, how much heat is extracted from the
ocean, how much brine is injected into the
ocean as a result of ice growth and how much melt water is injected back into the
ocean.
Steric sea level is driven by
volume changes through
ocean salinity (halosteric) and
ocean temperature (thermosteric) effects, from which the latter is known to play a dominant role
in observed contemporary rise of GSSL.
Changes in sea floor spreading rates effect the volume of the mid-oceanic ridges which may contribute to changes in the volume of the ocean
Changes in sea floor spreading rates effect the
volume of the mid-oceanic ridges which may contribute to
changes in the volume of the ocean
changes in the
volume of the
ocean basins.
So, I was curious about your recent paper and whether there was any discussion of
changes in the THC poleward of the GIS shelf vs the data from the RAPID program line located at 26.5 N. With the decline
in minimum extent and
volume of sea - ice, one might expect to see more THC sinking into the Arctic
Ocean, with consequences for both climate and weather.
On decadal and longer time scales, global mean sea level
change results from two major processes, mostly related to recent climate
change, that alter the
volume of water
in the global
ocean: i) thermal expansion (Section 5.5.3), and ii) the exchange of water between
oceans and other reservoirs (glaciers and ice caps, ice sheets, other land water reservoirs - including through anthropogenic
change in land hydrology, and the atmosphere; Section 5.5.5).
The resulting picture shows that ice
volume has
changed much more dramatically than
ocean temperatures
in response to
changes in orbital geometry.
Whether it exists as ice or water, it still has the same mass, it still displaces the same
volume and there's no
change in the
volume of the
ocean if it melts.
Dr. Curry implies (as far as I understood it) The «stadium wave» hypothesis is based by interplay between North Atlantic
Ocean temperatures oscillation (AMO) and the
changes in the sea ice
volumes in the Siberian Arctic
Ocean region.
SLR satellite data includes things such as the «GIA Adjustment» — which is the amount of SLR that there would have been if the
ocean basin hadn't increased
in volume and
in the case of this new study, how much higher the sea surface would have been if it had not been suppressed by the Mount Pinatubo volcanic eruption, another correction for ENSO / PDO «computed via a joint cyclostationary empirical orthogonal function (CSEOF) analysis of altimeter GMSL, GRACE land water storage, and Argo - based thermosteric sea level from 2005 to present», as well as other additions and adjustments — NONE OF WHICH can actually be found manifested
in any
change to the physical Sea Surface Height.»
► Eustatic sea - level rise is a
change in global average sea level brought about by an increase
in the
volume of the world
ocean.
http://www.vukcevic.talktalk.net/NFC1.htm http://www.vukcevic.talktalk.net/LFC20.htm Re UV: This is a copy of a note I wrote some 5 - 6 years ago with minor
changes (I occasionally quote it here and there since I think it still has some merit) Both UV and the particle radiation (particle radiation is a function of solar activity and the strength of Van Allen belt, via the Earth's field strength) could have far larger indirect contribution by controlling plankton
volumes, and
in turn
changing the
oceans» clarity and CO2 absorption.
Sea level
changes can be driven by either variations
in the masses or
volume of the
oceans («eustatic»), or by
changes of the sea surface relative to the land («relative»).
Eustatic
change (as opposed to local
change) results
in an alteration to the global sea levels due to
changes in either the
volume of water
in the world's
oceans or net
changes in the
volume of the
ocean basins.
In almost all IPCC models under climate
change forcing, the
ocean occupies a fixed geographical
volume.
In all of these simple models, we assume the atmosphere to have a volume as fixed as a bathtub, we assume that the atmosphere / ocean system is a closed system, we assume that the incoming radiation from the Sun is constant, we assume no turbulence, we assume no viscosity, we assume radiative equilibrium with no feedback lag, we take no account of water vapor flux assuming it to be constant, no change in albedo from changes in land use, glacier lengthening and shortening, no volcanic eruptions, no feedbacks from vegetatio
In all of these simple models, we assume the atmosphere to have a
volume as fixed as a bathtub, we assume that the atmosphere /
ocean system is a closed system, we assume that the incoming radiation from the Sun is constant, we assume no turbulence, we assume no viscosity, we assume radiative equilibrium with no feedback lag, we take no account of water vapor flux assuming it to be constant, no
change in albedo from changes in land use, glacier lengthening and shortening, no volcanic eruptions, no feedbacks from vegetatio
in albedo from
changes in land use, glacier lengthening and shortening, no volcanic eruptions, no feedbacks from vegetatio
in land use, glacier lengthening and shortening, no volcanic eruptions, no feedbacks from vegetation.
A recent comprehensive review [7] reveals that there are still wide uncertainties about the Earth's sea - level history that are especially large for time scales of tens of millions of years or longer, which is long enough for substantial
changes in the shape and
volume of
ocean basins.
To a first approximation, sea - level
changes reflect the
volume of
ocean water bound
in continental ice sheets during the ice ages.
b) volumetric effects —
change in the
volume of water contained
in the
oceans and the geometry and areal extent of the
ocean basins c) gravitational effects —
change in the gravitational attraction of the earth (induced by deformation), by the
change in distribution of ice and by the
change in self - attraction of the water d) rotational effects —
change in the moment of inertia caused by a
change in the distribution of mass within the earth and on its surface.
However, the uncertainty
in the reconstructed sea level is tens of metres and the uncertainty
in the Mg / Ca temperature is sufficient to encompass the result from our δ18O prescription, which has comparable contributions of ice
volume change and deep
ocean temperature
change at the Late Eocene glaciation of Antarctica.
In the
ocean and atmosphere interface the direction and rate of flow is determined by pressure and the
volume by the phase
changes of water.
A: The
volume integral (heat balance equation) as presented
in Pielke (2003) http://blue.atmos.colostate.edu/publications/pdf/R-247.pdf suggests that the
changes in ocean heat storage averaged over a year are a snapshot of the radiative imbalance at the top of the atmosphere.
And I DO know that ANYTHING that
changes the
volume of the
ocean OR the
volume of the
ocean basins by 36O km ^ 3 will result
in a
change in sea level by 1 mm.
This is not perfect because it is likely that climate effects such as
ocean currents and oscillations,
changes in biology, ice extent and
volume changes, cloud cover variations, etc... are causing a kind of climactic Brownian Motion, hiding the signal
in what, lacking deep understanding of these issues, we can only call noise.
And while the general narrative has stayed the same — large nutrient inputs derived from fertilizer and pesticide run - off turn once vibrant ecosystems into barren, lifeless deserts — some new science suggests climate
change will play a role
in exacerbating an already dire situation, expanding the
volume of dead zones
in tropical
oceans by up to 50 percent over the coming century.
MODELING OF FUTURE ARCTIC SEA ICE
CHANGE «Given the estimated trend and the
volume estimate for October — November of 2007 at less than 9,000 km3 (Kwok et al. 2009), one can project that at this rate it would take only 9 more years or until 2016 ± 3 years to reach a nearly ice - free Arctic
Ocean in summer.»
We're looking for an average temperature
change of perhaps 0.01 C
in an
ocean where 90 % its
volume is at a nearly constant 3C.
It then becomes a question of separating
volume changes due to thermal factors from
volume changes due to more or less water
in the
ocean.
This number is subtracted from altimetry - derived global mean sea level
in order to obtain the contribution due to
ocean (water)
volume change.