Additionally, family climate was not associated with differential
changes in outcome variables over time.
In addition, 53 % of the usual care - group subjects received «usual care» but without any measurable
change in the outcome variables measured.
Not exact matches
Correlational evidence shows that sizable
changes in teacher - related
variables are associated with much smaller
changes in student learning
outcomes (Hill, Rowan, and Ball, 2005; Hanushek and Rivkin, 2012).
In order to remove the confounding influence of unobserved factors that have an impact on both school spending and student outcomes, we calculate how much spending in a given school district would have been predicted to change due solely to the passage of an SFR, and use that prediction, rather than the spending change the district actually experienced, as our key variabl
In order to remove the confounding influence of unobserved factors that have an impact on both school spending and student
outcomes, we calculate how much spending
in a given school district would have been predicted to change due solely to the passage of an SFR, and use that prediction, rather than the spending change the district actually experienced, as our key variabl
in a given school district would have been predicted to
change due solely to the passage of an SFR, and use that prediction, rather than the spending
change the district actually experienced, as our key
variable.
If any of those
variables change in the future, the
outcome will
change.
What
changes (thresholds)
in these key
variables would have to occur to result
in a negative (or positive)
outcome for this resource?
Since we found baseline differences
in race / ethnicity and clinic site by treatment group, we also conducted multivariate analyses to control for these
variables on
outcomes including EC use, unprotected intercourse, contraceptive method
change, frequency of condom use, and condom use at last intercourse.
For the treatment period, the primary analysis for continuous measures was an analysis of variance using the slope of
change in the primary
variables as the
outcome measures and center, treatment, negative affect subtype, and all interactions as the independent measures.
If scientists can manipulate a
variable while keeping everything else constant, then they are
in control of the experiment, and they can be more certain that
variable caused the
change in the
outcome they're interested
in.
Only conduct problems at time 1 and the interaction between
change in Emotional Distance and CU traits were found to significantly predict the
outcome variable of time 2 conduct problems (p <.05).
This
outcome study was designed as a quantitative study that took place over 3 - time intervals and measured
change in intimacy based on 3
variables (satisfaction, conflict resolution, and communication) as perceived by individuals from an RLT Couple Experiential Treatment group and a Control group.
Parenting is a proximal
variable in the causal pathway to adverse
outcomes in childhood and adolescence, of which material disadvantage and economic hardship are distal
variables.32 Behavioural problems and temper tantrums among young children have been shown to increase as a result of parenting
changes associated with economic hardship.33 Economic deprivation has also been associated with decreased respect for the father and increased dependence on peer group for adolescent boys, and lowered feelings of self adequacy and reduced goal aspirations for adolescent girls.15 Economic hardship appears to have direct and indirect effects on adolescent functioning.
Multiple regression analyses were used to further explore possible mediator or suppressor effects of the working alliance on
outcome variables (residual
change in IES - R composite score and residual
change in BSI anxiety and BSI depression).
Assessing
change between cohorts
in the context of associations of breastfeeding
outcomes with socio - demographic
variables
Δ12 is a latent
variable referencing
change in target
variable from pretest to posttest; Δ23 is a latent
variable referencing
change in outcome from posttest to follow - up.
As it has been argued that using
change scores might be less reliable than individual scores, we covaried the HR scores
in the ostracism phase and used the HR
in the contemplation phase as the
outcome variable.