Not exact matches
Despite rapidly
changing public opinions about cannabis, the current political climate is likely to pause any further liberalization
in how leagues approach the substance.
nice to see you crawl out of your hole just
in time to offer your 2 cents worth once again... unlike yourself I started following this team long before Wenger arrived on the scene and will continue to do so long after he's gone...
in his earlier years I admired the cerebral elements he brought to the EPL, which at that point was more brutish than beautiful, and I respected the seemingly tireless efforts of Arsene, Dein & staff to uncover and develop talent without sacrificing the product on the field... likewise I appreciated that such a youthful manager wasn't afraid to bring strong personalities and / or world - class players into the fold without being fearful of how said players would potentially undermine and / or dilute his authority... unfortunately this all
changed about 10 years ago and culminated
in the removal of all our greatest players, both young and old, without any real replacements coming
in... from Henry to RVP to Fabergas and Nasri, it was easy to see that this club was no longer interested
in competing at the highest levels... instead of being honest, minus the ridiculous claims regarding the new stadium, Wenger chose to side with management and
in doing so became the «front man» for this corporation pretending to be a world - class soccer club... without the «front man» this organization would have been exposed numerous years earlier, so his presence was imperative if the facade was to continue... it's for this reason and more that I despise what this once great man and Kroenke has done to my beloved club... the gutless, shameful and manipulative way they have treated the fans, like myself, is largely indefensible and this is why I felt it necessary to start offering my
opinion in a
public format... trust me, I resisted the temptation for many years but as long as the same shit continues to exist I will voice my
opinions and if you don't like it maybe you should look for a different team to pretend to follow
This might
change public opinion in these countries
about wasting money on vanity projects like PSG and Manchester City.
In this edition of Poll Hub, the team discusses the latest poll numbers about the Mueller investigation and whether or not there has been a change in public opinio
In this edition of Poll Hub, the team discusses the latest poll numbers
about the Mueller investigation and whether or not there has been a
change in public opinio
in public opinion.
In addition to educational settings, the power of cartoons to persuade can be of value to agencies working to educate the
public about a science - laden concept — one for which they would like to
change opinion, intentions, or behaviors.
Nisbet's prior research examining
public opinion about climate
change and energy insecurity also revealed for science communicators that understanding the
public in more precise ways than partisanship or ideology allowed for improved outreach.
In the experiment, we asked a national sample of the US population to participate in a public opinion poll about popular topics (participants did not know that the study was really about climate change
In the experiment, we asked a national sample of the US population to participate
in a public opinion poll about popular topics (participants did not know that the study was really about climate change
in a
public opinion poll
about popular topics (participants did not know that the study was really
about climate
change).
Since 2008, Ed has served as Co-Principal Investigator (with Anthony Leiserowitz and Connie Roser - Renouf) of the Yale / George Mason University Climate
Change in the American Mind audience research project, which tracks public opinion about climate change, including the Global Warming's Six Americas audience seg
Change in the American Mind audience research project, which tracks
public opinion about climate
change, including the Global Warming's Six Americas audience seg
change, including the Global Warming's Six Americas audience segments.
I know what you mean
about leopard being considered tacky several years back; thankfully
public opinion has
changed on that one, because that skirt (and leopard
in general) is just fantastic!
While the study suggests that
public support for school reforms
changes with added information
about school quality,
in most instances, teacher
opinion is unaffected.
Founded for students, by students, SFER aims to
change public opinion about what is happening — and what should be happening —
in education, and help to enact policies that are built for lasting success.
I am arguing that
in order to understand
public outrage at dog attacks and potentially develop some more effective strategies to
change public opinion about BSL (
in order to
change government
opinion), we need to understand the root of this outrage.
I agree that cultural cognition — the idea that we shape our views so they agree with those
in the groups with which we most closely identify,
in the name of acceptance by our group and thus of safety — powerfully explains the polarized passions over whether climate
change is «real,» the «debate» that gets most of the attention
about public opinion.
John P. Holdren, the head of Harvard's Program on Science, Technology and
Public Policy and a longtime advocate of prompt curbs
in greenhouse gases, sent me a note
about the reaction he received after the Boston Globe and International Herald Tribune published his
opinion piece earlier this month asserting that «climate
change skeptics are dangerously wrong.»
Krosnik is a thoughtful scholar of the interplay between media coverage and
public understanding of and
opinions about climate
change whose views are worth a gander if you're interested
in this question.
Funny that Warren showed up here, because I was just stopping by the comment section to note that his paper demonstrates another manner
in how people are confused
about the mechanisms behind how the
public formulates
opinions (or gets confused
about) climate
change:
Not to deny by any means the importace of thinking
about the US vs. UK differences —
in public opinion &
in how
public opinion bears on political decisionmaking — but we did use our framework to test how cultural cognition, measured w / our scales, affects English (yes, English; not entire UK)
public engagement with informaton on climate
change.
In conversations
about climate
change, two different worlds tend to emerge: the scientific community and
public opinion.
As I've pointed out
in other essays, the notion that the whole world is anxious
about global warming or climate
change is an artefact of the way
in which
public opinion surveys construct their questions.
But the U.S.
public has never heard any president talk to them with candor
about the meaning of the climate
change problem, and until that happens
public opinion will be soft
in how much it's willing to support.
And as quoted at Romm's blog, Bob Brulle asserted that «The shift
in public opinion about climate
change is linked to the nature of mainstream media coverage of the so - called «climategate scandal.»
It's easy for people to get confused
about immense inertia of
public opinion on climate
change because advocacy pollsters are constantly «messaging» an «upsurge,» «shift,» «swing» etc.
in public perceptions of climate
change.
Public opinion in the U.S.
about anthropogenic climate
change is also
changing.
Public opinion about climate
change, observes the New York Times» Andrew Revkin, can be compared to «waves
in a shallow pan,» easily tipped with «a lot of sloshing but not a lot of depth.»
I have also noted that the message strategy employed
in An Inconvenient Truth likely appeals to a base of those already concerned
about climate
change and that Gore's visibility on the issue and political efforts likely have unintended negative consequences relative to
public opinion.
Part of the challenge
in creating the incentives for policymakers to take action on climate
change and to address the issue
in a serious way is to accurately communicate
about the nature of
public opinion.
Regarding Nisbet and getting around skeptics, his closing line is «Part of the challenge
in creating the incentives for policymakers to take action on climate
change and to address the issue
in a serious way is to accurately communicate
about the nature of
public opinion.»
Given the perceived «importance of extreme events as foci for
public and governmental
opinion», «the most valuable thing to do is to tell the story
about abrupt
change as vividly as possible»,
in order to «help the cause».
Academic studies find that the single biggest impact on
changes in public opinion regarding global warming is what Republican officeholders are saying
about it.
Since 2008, Ed has served as Co-Principal Investigator (with Anthony Leiserowitz and Connie Roser - Renouf) of the Yale / George Mason University Climate
Change in the American Mind audience research project, which tracks public opinion about climate change, including the Global Warming's Six Americas audience seg
Change in the American Mind audience research project, which tracks
public opinion about climate
change, including the Global Warming's Six Americas audience seg
change, including the Global Warming's Six Americas audience segments.
My wife, Tipper, and I will donate 100 percent of the proceeds of the award to the Alliance for Climate Protection, a bipartisan non-profit organization that is devoted to
changing public opinion in the U.S. and around the world
about the urgency of solving the climate crisis.
With regard to possible «tipping points»
in public opinion, I have been wondering what sort of event might act as a «global warming 9/11» — a shocking event that would quickly transform
public opinion about the urgent need to make and / or accept large - scale lifestyle
changes to quickly and drastically reduce GHG emissions?
And lo and behold, recent droughts, fires, and storms — the last being Sandy — undoubtedly have proven the theories of my much beloved «skeptics,»
about the causal factors
in public opinion on climate
change.
James Hansen, the director of the Nasa Goddard Institute for Space Studies who first warned the world
about the dangers of climate
change in the 1980s, has joined other scientists
in submitting statements to be considered by a judge at the Information Rights Tribunal on Friday... James Hansen told the Guardian: «Our children and grandchildren will judge those who have misled the
public, allowing fossil fuel emissions to continue almost unfettered, as guilty of crimes against humanity and nature... If successful, the FOI request may, by exposing one link
in a devious manipulation of
public opinion, start a process that allows the
public to be aware of what is happening, what is at stake, and where the
public interest lies.»»
Particularly
in the aftermath of the Grenfell Tower disaster (see «LASPO: why it's time to listen and review») and if Corbyn is indeed right
about the
change in public opinion, the time is ripe for reassessing the need for access to legal services for poor and marginalised communities.
Hertfordshire
About Blog EquiPepper is a popular blog which aims to use education to
change public opinion on thoroughbreds and
in turn, improve the welfare of the everyday horse.