Sentences with phrase «changes in scores from»

Results of grouped t tests and Mann - Whitney U tests to show t or z values, degrees of freedom, and p values for the differences in the changes in scores from baseline to follow up between the control and intervention group

The changes in these scores from baseline were combined to produce a therapeutic index of change for each outcome.

Estimates that include student fixed effects require at least three years of scores, which provide two changes in scores from one period to another, typically called gain scores (even though in some cases they are losses, not gains).

The use of value added measures are unstable — studies have shown teachers experience huge changes in their score from year to year

In other words, what is the research basis for attributing any change in score from year to year to the singular variable of a teacher?

Being able to track positive changes in your score from month to month can give you a mental boost so it's easier to keep chipping away at the balances.

Not exact matches

It has been more than five years since credit ratings firm Standard & Poor's downgraded the U.S. economy from the prized AAA score to AA — and that is unlikely to change in 2017, Standard and Poor's chief sovereign rating officer told CNBC Wednesday.

Though credit agencies have made recent changes to the way they factor medical debt into a credit score, more than half of all the debt that appears on credit reports in the United States stems from medical expenses.

«Maintaining a strong credit score will help students later in life as their goals change from paying for education to buying their first car, starting a business or buying their first home,» said Jarman.

Scoring agencies like JCT and CBO incorporate micro-dynamic changes from proposals in their conventional estimates — covering changes in behavior, supply and demand, and the timing of certain decisions, to name a few.

Off course we can not just change everyone on the pitch (as Hafiz would have liked), but the fair point is that we need a goal machine sort of striker and we need him as soon as possible, bringing on Alexis Sanchez (who just came back from his extended leave) in the second half after Walcott, is itself a proof that Giroud can not score in such games where if expect our striker to score.

* Did you notice in the score box that the possession arrow changed from the hoggs to BAMA as Minkah crossed the 50?

to make it short once the SPUDS scored the first goal they started believing they could win and they kept pushing forward taking the initiative and ultimately winning the game... WENGER has changed and it has been in part because he felt the pressure from Fans and experts alike, but he needs to become even more pro active, the SPUDS ran over us no question about it, but it was not because they are better, but because we let them do it.

I tell you from a footballing point of view scoring 8 goals you got have players that know where the goal posts are it takes energy and creativity to score 8 yes I agree vikings changed their players because their league is starting i think tomorrow so yes they were not a big team team but to say that Arsenal were not strong thats a bit to much and I say it again you need energy and creativity to score 8 I was very happy they did that Arsenal are well known for creating chances yesterday they converted them chances into Goals this should be the norm and I hope this will give them a lesson on how to win a game as they did nt dwell about with the ball it was goal after goal and that tells me that they went for the goals directly and I hope and wish the young guns all the best and to do well in the next season

If there was a symbolic changing of the guard, it occurred in Game 5 of the Florida - Boston playoff series last spring when Bill Lindsay, a winger with nice but not blinding speed, beat Bourque to the outside, cut in and scored the series - winning goal from his knees.

But although he scored lots early in the season, once Wenger changed to the new 3 -4-3 formation Walcott was more often than not started from the bench and was not brought on very often.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

If we try to completely boss the ball and build as slowly as we have been (which is what we'll most likely do because Arsene is stubborn and will refuse to change from the way we played that got a Tennis Score hung on us last time) we'll go out in the 433 with Ramsey and Jack ahead of Arteta, Alexis on one side, a no. 10 on the other, and Welbeck up top.

Granite Xhaka saved us last night, i'm not a great fan of Xhaka but i thought the game changed as soon as he come on, on Wilshere i have been his biggest supporter but last night he let me down badly, he made no space for himself he was just out for the fresh air, i thought Sead had a lousy game to even do he scored, it was a sad night for Arsenal supporters and football to watch that, there were plenty of alarms raised when we played Ostersunds FK in the first leg in the second half, AW should of known better to prepare his team and should get off his ass and shout a bit from the side line like all passionate managers do when they send a message to their players

Well your righ with met spend but in amount paid out for players no net were 5th but i agree our champions league performances have been poor we had some tough draws and the premier league is more demanding then the other leagues in strwnght of competition and games played still excuses do nt win but that monaco loss left me shaking my head in cl we get theough the group but cant muster the strength needed for knockout and we should be performing better were under performing for the talent xhaka has frustrated me hes got the talent and plays well but cant hold focus in games he drops off and loses his marks our academy is doing well but yes it is tougher now to break in to the first team iwobi has done well but one or two seasons away from being there if he does turn himself elite ever has to score or he will just be another ox but i think its been a wake up call to the club we finally have to act theres a wave of ideas to not only get us back to winning ways but become title contenders and i think give him the extension one year its a world cup year and that will also allow our players esp strikers who been very poor this year realized its tough to play in englad and next year will have a better idea what it really takes to win here shore up some spots and depth and were in contention fail and the changes will happen but let him have one more year the fact were willing to spend shows me an upturn from the decline

Also, I'm not sure if the question should be changed from do we need Giroud to score 25 goals in order to win the league to do we simply need a better player up front than Giroud (regardless of how many he scores?).

When Ozil scored from Monreal's fired cross two minutes later, completing a great move down the left from Arsenal, it could have changed the game but the German's complained and the ref disallowed it for a handball, rubbing salt into the wound by booking Ozil even though he had not seen it to decide if it was deliberate, and the speed of the ball in makes that very harsh.

In fact he thinks changing his style and being more focused on scoring could actually take away from what he brings to the team.

These changes, along with the low scoring output in the 2014 Pro Bowl, caused oddsmakers to decrease the total by 20.5 - points (from 89 to 68.5) for last year's Pro Bowl.

I personally do not believe so, we had a solid def at the start of the season after the liverpool game and we ended the season with 4 clean sheets from that formation change and that includes a clean sheet against UTD while limiting City to 1 goal as we knocked them out the FA CUP and the same for Chelsea who had scored the 2nd most goals in the EPL...

I think we did well today, we tire them out and Wenger brought in Gibbs for pace, which was a good change... If They hadn't scored in the first half and Giroud had put one of those headers away, it would have been a whole different match all together... I think Campbell did well, he might be a little slow but he is gelling well with the team and getting better, he doesn't just burst forward without purpose and when he did today, it took a good save from Iloris to keep it out and he got a round of applause from both the fans and his team mates, which to me is good and will only boost his confidence and that's one thing we haven't seen in quite some time, a proper right winger.

1 mythical counter attack 2 mythical take ons 3 Mythical outrunning most defenders 4 mythical scoring goals from outside the box 5 mythical dribble 6 or allows for a tactical change in formation.

Any subsequent corrections, changes and / or updates to that information from OPTA or WHOSCORED.COM after the Promoter has finalised the points will not be used in the points calculation and there will be no amendments to the scores of any entrants to the Game.

Alex Lacazette is yet to score away from the Emirates for us - but he came close to changing that when bringing a fine save from Thibaut Courtois in the opening stages at Chelsea on Sunday.

My opinion is the team that defends very well, that leaves their philosophy in the dressing room, changes their attitude, plays all the second half with nine players in front of the box, doesn't concede and scores one goal, from that perspective they deserve to win.

So United may not have it all their own way for a change, especially if their dire form on the road from last season hasn't been resolved: Sir Alex masterminded just five teams downfalls away from home in 2010/11, scoring twenty goals fewer yet conceding twice as many.

However, the data is very subjective as top teams also score a high percentage of their goals from other types of chances and a lot of the conversion rate figures are very close together, meaning these could easily change in a few matches time.

This past weekend, the MInnesota State High School League took an unprecedented step of changing the rules mid-season, by stiffening the penalties on three of the most violent and dangerous infractions in hockey: checking from behind, boarding and contact to the head will now result in an automatic five - minute «major» against the offending player resulting in ejection and forcing his team to play short - handed for five minutes, regardless of how many times it is scored upon during the ensuing power play.

Using DTI, researchers at Wake Forest found in a 2014 study [26] that a single season of high school football can produce changes in the white matter of the brain of the type previously associated with mTBI in the absence of a clinical diagnosis of concussion, and that these impact - related changes in the brain are strongly associated with a postseason change in the verbal memory composite score from baseline on the ImPACT neurocognitive test.

Didn't he cave in a couple of years ago after taking thousands of dollars from NYSUT and vote with a «heavy heart» for a budget that included changes in the teacher evaluation law that quite severely tied teacher ratings to test scores?

Based on past results, any change in the numbers from these preliminary rates to the final scores released by the State next year will be negligible (expected to be less than one - tenth of one percent).»

«We really need legislative change in terms of having the test scores decoupled from the teacher evaluations.»

Mi - Prostate Score developed from a discovery in the lab of Arul Chinnaiyan, M.D., Ph.D., in 2005 of a genetic anomaly that occurs in about half of all prostate cancers, an instance of two genes changing places and fusing together.

Similar scandals erupted over the effects of scores of industrial applications, ranging from sulfur dioxide and acid rain, to certain aerosols and the hole in the ozone layer, to leaded gas and cognitive impairment, to the granddaddy of them all, fossil fuels and global climate change.

In addition, changes after 2008 — including (i) the new NIH scoring system implemented in 2009 and (ii) the impact of funding from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA)-- would introduce information that is not comparable to the rest of the samplIn addition, changes after 2008 — including (i) the new NIH scoring system implemented in 2009 and (ii) the impact of funding from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA)-- would introduce information that is not comparable to the rest of the samplin 2009 and (ii) the impact of funding from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA)-- would introduce information that is not comparable to the rest of the sample.

Third, they calculated the change in the average depression scores on HADS, and depressive symptom prevalence between two months to six months, and from six to 12 months after discharge.

In both tests they collected scores of measurements derived from the phones» changing positions, including the angles of turns and the trajectory of curves.

Decline in cognitive test scores over 10 years (% change = change / range of text × 100) as function of baseline age cohort in men and women, estimated from linear mixed models.

«Because we saw increases in muscle function scores up to 14 months after treatment in our single - dose study, we will continue to monitor the patients from our multiple dose study who enter the extension study for longer - term changes in muscle function scores.

The changes in psychological well - being scores (Supplementary Table S1) indicated major improvements in all three groups from the first to fifth day and 1 month later on all measures (depressive symptoms, perceived stress, mindful awareness and vitality).

Design, setting, and participants: Mendelian randomization analyses evaluating the association between CETP and HMGCR scores, changes in lipid and lipoprotein levels, and the risk of cardiovascular events involving 102837 participants from 14 cohort or case - control studies conducted in North America or the United Kingdom between 1948 and 2012.

The results also showed no significant change in angina severity score or physical limitation and no significant change in angina frequency from baseline versus sham.

For example, if the meditation group improves from 10 to 19 on a mental health scale and the control group improves from 11 to 16 on the same scale, the relative difference between groups in the change score is: -LCB--LSB-(19 − 10) − (16 − 11)-RSB- / 10 -RCB- × 100 = 40 %.

This pattern could be interpreted as a delayed onset to allodynia, yet scores from ketogenic diet - fed and control diet - fed nerve - damaged mice never differed significantly, and a small change in ketogenic diet - fed sham - surgery mice at weeks 1 and 2 probably contributed to a loss of statistical significance when comparing sham versus treatment animal within each diet group.

In this study, the primary cognitive end - points measured were the mean change from baseline in the AD Assessment Scale - Cognitive subscale, and global scores in the AD Cooperative Study — Clinical Global Impression of Change (Henderson et al., 2009In this study, the primary cognitive end - points measured were the mean change from baseline in the AD Assessment Scale - Cognitive subscale, and global scores in the AD Cooperative Study — Clinical Global Impression of Change (Henderson et al., change from baseline in the AD Assessment Scale - Cognitive subscale, and global scores in the AD Cooperative Study — Clinical Global Impression of Change (Henderson et al., 2009in the AD Assessment Scale - Cognitive subscale, and global scores in the AD Cooperative Study — Clinical Global Impression of Change (Henderson et al., 2009in the AD Cooperative Study — Clinical Global Impression of Change (Henderson et al., Change (Henderson et al., 2009).