Sentences with phrase «changes in the publishing field»

The Internet and major changes in the publishing field have also led to opportunities for teachers to serve as education consultants at companies that produce educational materials.

Not exact matches

Quicksprout recently published an awesome new infographic on the state of SEO that illustrates how the field has evolved over the past few years in response to Google's game - changing algorithm updates and the steady rise of content as king.

Second tale: Defying all the best previous research on how readily people change their opinions, a young PhD student in political science at a top research university teams up with a senior scholar in his field at another top school to publish a brief report in America's leading scholarly scientific journal that upends everything we thought we knew about the subject.

The results of a 11 - year study of the impact of statewide field triage changes to Maryland's helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) were published online in Annals of Emergency Medicine.

As Germán Orizaola, co-author of the study published in the journal Ecology and a researcher at the Swedish university states «Among the many challenges climate change poses to natural ecosystems, the effect it can have on the dietary preferences of living organisms is a field of study that has been attracting researchers» attention in recent years.»

In a new study published in Nature, researchers in these two academic fields have joined forces at the University of Pennsylvania to solve an essential problem of how languages evolve: determining whether language changes occur by random chance or by a selective forcIn a new study published in Nature, researchers in these two academic fields have joined forces at the University of Pennsylvania to solve an essential problem of how languages evolve: determining whether language changes occur by random chance or by a selective forcin Nature, researchers in these two academic fields have joined forces at the University of Pennsylvania to solve an essential problem of how languages evolve: determining whether language changes occur by random chance or by a selective forcin these two academic fields have joined forces at the University of Pennsylvania to solve an essential problem of how languages evolve: determining whether language changes occur by random chance or by a selective force.

In a study published Dec. 15 in the journal PLOS ONE, researchers from the University of Washington looked at the abstracts from more than 700 scientific papers about climate change to find out what makes a paper influential in its fielIn a study published Dec. 15 in the journal PLOS ONE, researchers from the University of Washington looked at the abstracts from more than 700 scientific papers about climate change to find out what makes a paper influential in its fielin the journal PLOS ONE, researchers from the University of Washington looked at the abstracts from more than 700 scientific papers about climate change to find out what makes a paper influential in its fielin its field.

In a paper published in Visual Cognition, researchers from Concordia University, Kansas State University, the University of Findlay, the University of Central Florida and the University of Illinois prove that we can automatically detect changes in blur across our field of vieIn a paper published in Visual Cognition, researchers from Concordia University, Kansas State University, the University of Findlay, the University of Central Florida and the University of Illinois prove that we can automatically detect changes in blur across our field of viein Visual Cognition, researchers from Concordia University, Kansas State University, the University of Findlay, the University of Central Florida and the University of Illinois prove that we can automatically detect changes in blur across our field of viein blur across our field of view.

A study published in 2014, which also used VANDAM data, found that the material being pulled toward one young star is twisting the magnetic field lines and changing their configuration along the way.

Unfortunately, just 3.5 years after it was published, it's already starting to be a bit out of date in a fast - moving field — I found myself Googling for the current status of legislation and companies (some of which have gone out of business or changed drastically since the book was published).

Research shows that more than 97 percent of scientists actively publishing in the field agree that climate change is real and human caused.

The groups represented at the expo included Alumni Relations, the Annual Fund, Career Services, the Field Experience Program, Gutman Library Research Services, Human Resources, the Achievement Gap Initiative, the Change Leadership Group, the Executive Leadership Program for Educators, Harvard Education Publishing Group, Harvard Family Research Project, the Office of School Partnerships, Programs in Professional Education, Project Zero, the Usable Knowledge website, and WIDE World.

Past interns have worked with researchers who are leaders in their fields, been published by The Century Foundation, and gone on to become drivers of social change in government, journalism, academia, and more.

Her recent books include: The Growing Out - of - School Time Field: Past, Present, and Future (Information Age Publishing, 2018); The Future Directions of Educational Change: Social Justice, Professional Capital, and Systems Change (Routledge, 2018); «Empowering Teachers: The Role of School - Community Partnerships» (book chapter with IEL's Reuben Jacobson in Flip the System: Changing Education from the Ground Up, 2015); Leading Educational Change: Global Issues, Challenges, and Lessons on Whole - System Reform (Teachers College Press, 2013), The Futures of School Reform (Harvard Education Press, 2012, co-authored chapter with Jeffrey Henig and Paul Reville).

In the days of digital technology, e-books, tablet reading devices and Kindle Direct Publishing (to name one distribution platform), paperback for indie authors was the one «as yet unconquered» land for self - published authors everywhere until about four years ago, when Amazon - owned print - on - demand company CreateSpace built traction and changed the playing field for indies everywhere.

In it, Lulu authors Bob Hoyt and Ann Yoshihashi share their experiences self - publishing a textbook in the ever - changing field of health care and information technologIn it, Lulu authors Bob Hoyt and Ann Yoshihashi share their experiences self - publishing a textbook in the ever - changing field of health care and information technologin the ever - changing field of health care and information technology.

Write just 2 short blog posts a week about each of the 100 most important changes in your field, and in less than a year you'll have a book ready to publish next year!

I agreed with the analysis put forward by other indies that the promotional opportunities for books in Kindle Unlimited had changed the playing field, making it more difficult for independently published books not in KU to compete for visibility — at least in my categories.

While it's satisfying and exciting to see the changes that are happening in publishing (I recently submitted two novels to HarperVoyager for their open submissions that allow previously self - pubbed books), the playing field is still not level.

Christopher Field, Ph.D., Co-chair of IPCC Working Group II, said: «We expect the recommendations from the IAC's review to inform how the IPCC prepares its fifth major assessment of global climate change, due to be published in 2013 - 2014.

Read any field biologist who's published in this area about recent changes.

I'd asked Pierrrehumbert to reflect on the time - scale conundrum laid out in the Nature Climate Change paper in the context of another important and provocative proposal by Princeton's Robert Socolow, published in the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists in December, proposing a new field of inquiry — Destiny Studies — to examine the tough intersection of ethics, risk perception and science.

A study (http://resources.irregularclimate.com/docs/expert-credibility-in-climatechange.pdf) Published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences confirms what people who have been paying attention already know: 97 — 98 % of the climate researchers most actively publishing in the field support the tenets of ACC outlined by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, and (ii) the relative climate expertise and scientific prominence of the researchers unconvinced of ACC are substantially below that of the convinced researchers.

-LRB-...) we use an extensive dataset of 1,372 climate researchers and their publication and citation data to show that (i) 97 — 98 % of the climate researchers most actively publishing in the field support the tenets of ACC outlined by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, and (ii) the relative climate expertise and scientific prominence of the researchers unconvinced of ACC are substantially below that of the convinced researchers.

There is a 15 year delay between the changes in the angular momentum of the Earth's inner core (where magnetic field is generated) and the LOD (length of the day) NASA and the Oxford University scientists in 1997/2000 published paper on the effect: Torsional oscillations of the Earth's core http://trs-new.jpl.nasa.gov/dspace/bitstream/2014/13763/1/00-0133.pdf

Cook: BTW, here's an example of the kind of response we can expect - this is the WSJ 16 response to the Doran / Anderegg 97 % consensus: http://theclimatescepticsparty.blogspot.com.au/2012/02/scientists-riposte.html «The Trenberth letter states: «Research shows that more than 97 % of scientists actively publishing in the field agree that climate change is real and human caused.»

Renown solar scientist Dr. K.G. McCracken from the Institute for Physical Science and Technology, University of Maryland, in 2007 published paper: Changes in the cosmic ray and heliomagnetic components of space climate, 1428 — 2005, including the variable occurrence of solar energetic particle events McCracken 2007 paper Major result of McCracken investigation based on 10Be dating is: the estimated annual average heliospheric magnetic field strength near Earth, 1428 — 2005, based on the inter-calibrated cosmic ray record as shown in Fig. 2 on p. 1073 (4 of 8).

Anything of interest to the scientists whose field is dealt with by the particular journal may be published; for example Dr Naomi Oreskes, of the University of California in San Diego, published a study that she did showing that there is an overwhelming consensus in the scientific publications on the human cause for climate change.

First, there was a conspicuous rise in the number of climate change publications in the 2 years following IPCC 2007, which likely reflects the rise in popularity (among public and funding agencies) for this field of research and the increased appetite among journal editors to publish these articles.

This complex, interactive relationship has been tracked across more than 40 years of research in the field of media effects (a field in which I have published extensively), is suggested by the few studies conducted examining how cable news influences perceptions of climate change, and is accurately reviewed and referenced in the chapter.

Perhaps a coincidence, the apparent popularity of climate change articles (i.e., number of published articles and reported effect sizes) plummeted shortly after Climategate, when the world media focused its scrutiny on this field of research, and perhaps, popularity in this field waned (Fig. 1).

Together, they wrote Climate for Change: Global Warming Facts for Faith - Based Decisions in 2009 (it's being reissued this year), a book, in which, just as importantly, Hayhoe, an active and well - published leader in her field, came out to the scientific community as religious.

While presenting himself as an expert debunker of environmental myths, Stott has not published anything in the field he most frequently comments on viz. climate change.

The study, just published in Nature Geoscience, is the latest in the relatively new field of attribution, where scientists identify the fingerprints of human influence on observed changes in temperature, rainfall, and other climate parameters.

As Media Matters points out, CNBC introduces Happer as an «industry expert» on climate change, but fails to mention that Happer has never published any scientific research in the field.

97 — 98 % of the climate researchers most actively publishing in the field surveyed here support the tenets of [anthropogenic climate change] outlined by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate change] outlined by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate ChangeChange

97 — 98 % of the climate researchers most actively publishing in the field support the tenets of ACC outlined by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, and (ii) the relative climate expertise and scientific prominence of the researchers unconvinced of ACC are substantially below that of the convinced researchers.

Here, we use an extensive dataset of 1,372 climate researchers and their publication and citation data to show that (i) 97 — 98 % of the climate researchers most actively publishing in the field surveyed here support the tenets of ACC outlined by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, and (ii) the relative climate expertise and scientific prominence of the researchers unconvinced of ACC are substantially below that of the convinced researchers.

The deepclimate.blog also cast aspersions at my qualifications for writing a technical review of climate change, pointing out that I had not published in the field — which is true.

It suggests that most people who regard themselves as climate scientists and who have been recently publishing mainly in the field of climate change think that global temperatures have been rising recently and that human activity is a significant contributing factor in global temperature change.

Here, we use an extensive dataset of 1,372 climate researchers and their publication and citation data to show that (i) 97 — 98 % of the climate researchers most actively publishing in the field support the tenets of ACC outlined by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, and (ii) the relative climate expertise and scientific prominence of the researchers unconvinced of ACC are substantially below that of the convinced researchers.

1) climate science today is not a «small field»; there are thousands of papers now published in this field — a quick scan of the references cited in the IPCC reports will attest to this, or type in «climate» and «change or warming» in a science search engine like Google Scholar (restricting your search to science areas) and see how many hits you get — I did and got 721,000.

Dr. Mann invokes the 97 % consensus argument that «of scientists publishing in the field have all concluded, based on the evidence, that climate change is real, is human - caused, and is already having adverse impacts on us, our economy, and our planet».

In a poll of scientists in different fields by Doran and Kendall Zimmerman (2009), 97 % of those who published at least half of their peer - reviewed research in the climate field agreed that human activity was significant in changing global temperature; at the other extreme, only 47 % of economic geologists (typically employed by oil companies and the like) concurreIn a poll of scientists in different fields by Doran and Kendall Zimmerman (2009), 97 % of those who published at least half of their peer - reviewed research in the climate field agreed that human activity was significant in changing global temperature; at the other extreme, only 47 % of economic geologists (typically employed by oil companies and the like) concurrein different fields by Doran and Kendall Zimmerman (2009), 97 % of those who published at least half of their peer - reviewed research in the climate field agreed that human activity was significant in changing global temperature; at the other extreme, only 47 % of economic geologists (typically employed by oil companies and the like) concurrein the climate field agreed that human activity was significant in changing global temperature; at the other extreme, only 47 % of economic geologists (typically employed by oil companies and the like) concurrein changing global temperature; at the other extreme, only 47 % of economic geologists (typically employed by oil companies and the like) concurred.

Lately, I've been thinking (and writing) quite a bit about change in the legal field, in large part because I've been reading Mitchell Kowalski's recently published book, «Avoiding Extinction: Reimagining Legal Services for the 21st Century» (ABA 2012).

Field test evidence for this program (Popkin, 1984) was published in The Second Handbook of Parent Education (Fine, 1991) and reported significant positive changes in the behavior of both parents and children.

In 2001, Betty Carter & Monica McGoldrick two of the most - respected authors, teachers, and clinicians in the field of family therapy, published Advances in Coaching: Family Therapy with One Person, detailing 25 years of research into the theory and techniques of «coaching» individuals to change themselves in the context of their family of origiIn 2001, Betty Carter & Monica McGoldrick two of the most - respected authors, teachers, and clinicians in the field of family therapy, published Advances in Coaching: Family Therapy with One Person, detailing 25 years of research into the theory and techniques of «coaching» individuals to change themselves in the context of their family of origiin the field of family therapy, published Advances in Coaching: Family Therapy with One Person, detailing 25 years of research into the theory and techniques of «coaching» individuals to change themselves in the context of their family of origiin Coaching: Family Therapy with One Person, detailing 25 years of research into the theory and techniques of «coaching» individuals to change themselves in the context of their family of origiin the context of their family of origin.

In 2002 and again in 2005, FrameWorks published handbooks for the field of practice on framing for social changIn 2002 and again in 2005, FrameWorks published handbooks for the field of practice on framing for social changin 2005, FrameWorks published handbooks for the field of practice on framing for social change.