Among the explanations that have been put forward are the increased credibility of central banks in controlling inflation (inflation rates remain below 3 per cent across the developed world), the low level of official interest rates in the major economies reflecting low inflation and the continuing weakness in some economies, a glut of savings on world markets particularly sourced from the Asian region, and
changes to pension fund rules in some countries which are seen as biasing investments away from equities towards bonds.
The vote comes on the heels of last week's historic day of industrial action by the NHS, whereby doctors boycotted non-acute care as a way of expressing their dissatisfaction with the government's proposed
changes to their pension funds.
Not exact matches
Important factors that could cause actual results
to differ materially from those reflected in such forward - looking statements and that should be considered in evaluating our outlook include, but are not limited
to, the following: 1) our ability
to continue
to grow our business and execute our growth strategy, including the timing, execution, and profitability of new and maturing programs; 2) our ability
to perform our obligations under our new and maturing commercial, business aircraft, and military development programs, and the related recurring production; 3) our ability
to accurately estimate and manage performance, cost, and revenue under our contracts, including our ability
to achieve certain cost reductions with respect
to the B787 program; 4) margin pressures and the potential for additional forward losses on new and maturing programs; 5) our ability
to accommodate, and the cost of accommodating, announced increases in the build rates of certain aircraft; 6) the effect on aircraft demand and build rates of
changing customer preferences for business aircraft, including the effect of global economic conditions on the business aircraft market and expanding conflicts or political unrest in the Middle East or Asia; 7) customer cancellations or deferrals as a result of global economic uncertainty or otherwise; 8) the effect of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which we operate in the U.S. and globally and any
changes therein, including fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates; 9) the success and timely execution of key milestones such as the receipt of necessary regulatory approvals, including our ability
to obtain in a timely fashion any required regulatory or other third party approvals for the consummation of our announced acquisition of Asco, and customer adherence
to their announced schedules; 10) our ability
to successfully negotiate, or re-negotiate, future pricing under our supply agreements with Boeing and our other customers; 11) our ability
to enter into profitable supply arrangements with additional customers; 12) the ability of all parties
to satisfy their performance requirements under existing supply contracts with our two major customers, Boeing and Airbus, and other customers, and the risk of nonpayment by such customers; 13) any adverse impact on Boeing's and Airbus» production of aircraft resulting from cancellations, deferrals, or reduced orders by their customers or from labor disputes, domestic or international hostilities, or acts of terrorism; 14) any adverse impact on the demand for air travel or our operations from the outbreak of diseases or epidemic or pandemic outbreaks; 15) our ability
to avoid or recover from cyber-based or other security attacks, information technology failures, or other disruptions; 16) returns on
pension plan assets and the impact of future discount rate
changes on
pension obligations; 17) our ability
to borrow additional
funds or refinance debt, including our ability
to obtain the debt
to finance the purchase price for our announced acquisition of Asco on favorable terms or at all; 18) competition from commercial aerospace original equipment manufacturers and other aerostructures suppliers; 19) the effect of governmental laws, such as U.S. export control laws and U.S. and foreign anti-bribery laws such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the United Kingdom Bribery Act, and environmental laws and agency regulations, both in the U.S. and abroad; 20) the effect of
changes in tax law, such as the effect of The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the «TCJA») that was enacted on December 22, 2017, and
changes to the interpretations of or guidance related thereto, and the Company's ability
to accurately calculate and estimate the effect of such
changes; 21) any reduction in our credit ratings; 22) our dependence on our suppliers, as well as the cost and availability of raw materials and purchased components; 23) our ability
to recruit and retain a critical mass of highly - skilled employees and our relationships with the unions representing many of our employees; 24) spending by the U.S. and other governments on defense; 25) the possibility that our cash flows and our credit facility may not be adequate for our additional capital needs or for payment of interest on, and principal of, our indebtedness; 26) our exposure under our revolving credit facility
to higher interest payments should interest rates increase substantially; 27) the effectiveness of any interest rate hedging programs; 28) the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting; 29) the outcome or impact of ongoing or future litigation, claims, and regulatory actions; 30) exposure
to potential product liability and warranty claims; 31) our ability
to effectively assess, manage and integrate acquisitions that we pursue, including our ability
to successfully integrate the Asco business and generate synergies and other cost savings; 32) our ability
to consummate our announced acquisition of Asco in a timely matter while avoiding any unexpected costs, charges, expenses, adverse
changes to business relationships and other business disruptions for ourselves and Asco as a result of the acquisition; 33) our ability
to continue selling certain receivables through our supplier financing program; 34) the risks of doing business internationally, including fluctuations in foreign current exchange rates, impositions of tariffs or embargoes, compliance with foreign laws, and domestic and foreign government policies; and 35) our ability
to complete the proposed accelerated stock repurchase plan, among other things.
Among the factors that could cause actual results
to differ materially are the following: (1) worldwide economic, political, and capital markets conditions and other factors beyond the Company's control, including natural and other disasters or climate
change affecting the operations of the Company or its customers and suppliers; (2) the Company's credit ratings and its cost of capital; (3) competitive conditions and customer preferences; (4) foreign currency exchange rates and fluctuations in those rates; (5) the timing and market acceptance of new product offerings; (6) the availability and cost of purchased components, compounds, raw materials and energy (including oil and natural gas and their derivatives) due
to shortages, increased demand or supply interruptions (including those caused by natural and other disasters and other events); (7) the impact of acquisitions, strategic alliances, divestitures, and other unusual events resulting from portfolio management actions and other evolving business strategies, and possible organizational restructuring; (8) generating fewer productivity improvements than estimated; (9) unanticipated problems or delays with the phased implementation of a global enterprise resource planning (ERP) system, or security breaches and other disruptions
to the Company's information technology infrastructure; (10) financial market risks that may affect the Company's
funding obligations under defined benefit
pension and postretirement plans; and (11) legal proceedings, including significant developments that could occur in the legal and regulatory proceedings described in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10 - K for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017, and any subsequent quarterly reports on Form 10 - Q (the «Reports»).
Trotsky said the
pension has about 10 percent of its money in PE — around the national average for large public retirement
funds — and has no plans
to change that.
We do support, however,
changes to the
funding and management of the federal employees»
pension plans, including the move
to more equitable contribution rates,
changes in retirement provisions for new employees, among others.
It also has been a sometime tool of activist hedge and
pension funds for legitimate corporate governance
changes, but left - leaning state and local
pension funds and union
pension funds have often used it
to achieve political or social ends not shared by other investors.
Companies undergoing a
change of ownership are encouraged
to seek clearance for the deal from the TPR and explain how they will protect the
pension fund going forward.
The
changes also will force some public
pension funds to calculate retirement benefits using more conservative assumptions.
Cuomo will be joined this morning on a telephone press conference by good government advocates who will add their voices
to his call for
pension fund reform that would
change management of the
fund from a sole trusteeship
to a board system.
Instead, there would be a tax cut of 4p in the basic rate,
funded by
changes to the tax system as it related
to pension contributions, capital gains and pollution.
It would require an act of the Legislature
to change the way the
pension fund is managed.
From noon
to 3 p.m., climate
change activists will rally and deliver
pension fund divestment petitions
to state Comptroller Tom DiNapoli, 59 Maiden Lane, Manhattan.
«Mr. DiNapoli has made some helpful
changes in the comptroller's office in an effort
to shield the $ 125 billion
pension fund from political influence.
Forand also cited DiNapoli's audits of state and local governments and school districts that save taxpayers millions of dollars statewide while using the investment clout of the
pension fund to influence corporate behavior such as in addressing climate
change.
DiNapoli has sought
to leverage the
pension fund to produce
changes in fossil fuel companies as an activist shareholder.
DiNapoli says he'll use his influence as trustee of New York's $ 192 billion dollar state
pension fund to «seek out sustainable investments and
changes in corporate behavior»
to help the Paris Agreement «become a reality».
The governor also said he would push for a
change to the state constitution that would deprive a convicted public official of a
pension, end the use of campaign
funds for personal use and curtail legislative «per diem» payments
to cover only actual expenses.
Mr. DiNapoli also announced the
pension fund had withdrawn shareholder proposals at three energy companies due
to their climate -
change disclosure policies.
Malloy said Connecticut's
pension fund system is broken, and, if nothing
changes, in the year 2032 the state will have
to pay $ 13 billion dollars in retirement benefits when it reaches what Malloy called «a fiscal cliff.»
Liberal Democrat
pensions spokesman David Laws said the ruling showed people who lost their
pensions before the protection
fund was set up were «grotesquely short -
changed» and said ministers must now recognise their «moral responsibility»
to help.
Also, for a while there Cuomo was making a push
to change the sole trusteeship of the state
pension fund — basically the biggest power the comptroller has — into a board system.
Cuomo, who is pushing for the sole trusteeship of the
pension fund to be
changed to a board oversight system, has so far refused
to endorse DiNapoli's bid
to keep the office
to which he was elevated by his legislative colleagues in 2007.
Doctors say the
changes disproportionately impact their field, as physicians will see their contributions
to pension funds rise more than other public sector employees.
DiNapoli said he'll use his influence as trustee of New York's $ 192 billion state
pension fund to «seek out sustainable investments and
changes in corporate behavior»
to help the Paris agreement «become a reality.»
Comptroller hopeful and City Councilwoman Melinda Katz (D - Forest Hills) Monday called on the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
to ratify proposed rule
changes that would allow shareholders
to nominate directors on corporate boards — a
change she says would have tremendous impact on city
pension funds.
The «End New York Corruption Now Act» would also expand the powers of the attorney general's office
to prosecute public corruption, create new criminal categories for undisclosed self - dealing and bribery, and
change the
pension forfeiture rule passed earlier this year
to prevent state
funds being used even
to provide for a convicted official's spouse or children.
In response, DiNapoli said the retirement system is already a leader among public
pension funds in seeking
to push a low carbon economy and getting corporations
to address climate
change issues, such as through shareholder resolutions aimed at companies like ExxonMobil.
The incumbent showed more enthusiasm in describing reforms he's led
to how the
pension system is run, including
changing the fee structure for investors hired
to grow the
funds.
Cuomo outlined several
changes he said should take place, including full disclosure of all outside income for legislators; stopping the personal use of campaign
funds; updating campaign finance laws
to require more disclosure; and removing state
pensions from lawmakers convicted of public corruption.
He has promised dramatic
changes to the state's
pension system and its formula for
funding schools, over the objections of his old enemies in organized labor.
Cuomo proposes
to extend a system of public campaign finance
to all statewide offices and legislative races, ban the use of campaign
funds for personal expenses, require the disclosure of outside income and the clients who supported it and
change the state Constitution
to allow prosecutors
to claw back the
pensions of officials convicted of public corruption.
«I want
to use the
pension fund and invest it wisely and use it as a vehicle for
change,» Spitzer said, referring
to the
pension funds as «our money.»
Octopus and the companies it backs stand
to gain from such
changes, of course, and a further step forward would be if
pension funds were encouraged
to invest in high growth small businesses.
If they set a floor for employer
pension contributions, states would simultaneously have
to change the rules that govern
pension funding.
Wishing away the
funding problems won't
change the fact that current defined benefit
pension plans are simply not delivering sufficient retirement benefits
to the majority of the teaching workforce.
FILE - In this April 13, 2018 file photo, teachers from across Kentucky gather inside the state Capitol
to rally for increased
funding and
to protest
changes to their state
funded pension system in Frankfort, Ky..
In order
to address that problem, Governor Dannel Malloy is proposing
to dramatically
change the way Connecticut
funds its state employee
pension system.
He won't even reprimand the union for its reptilian attempts
to depose Steve Sweeney — NJEA is backing Fran Grenier, a Trump - supporting, climate
change - denying, immigration foe — because the Senate President can do math and wouldn't allow an amendment on the ballot
to fully
fund pensions because such lunacy would fast - track state bankruptcy.
1912: NEA endorses Women's Suffrage 1919: NEA members in New Jersey lead the way
to the nation's first state
pension; by 1945, every state had a
pension plan in effect 1941: NEA successfully lobbied Congress for special
funding for public schools near military bases 1945: NEA lobbied for the G.I. Bill of Rights
to help returning soldiers continue their education 1958: NEA helps gain passage of the National Defense Education Act 1964: NEA lobbies
to pass the Civil Rights Act 1968: NEA leads an effort
to establish the Bilingual Education Act 1974: NEA backs a case heard before the U.S. Supreme Court that proposes
to make unlawful the firing of pregnant teachers or forced maternity leave 1984: NEA fights for and wins passage of a federal retirement equity law that provides the means
to end sex discrimination against women in retirement
funds 2000s: NEA has lobbied for
changes to the No Child Left Behind Act 2009: NEA delegates
to the Representative Assembly pass a resolution that opposes the discriminatory treatment of same - sex couple
Wishing away
pension funding problems won't
change the fact that current plans are simply not delivering sufficient retirement benefits
to the majority of the teaching workforce.
Despite these
changes, state
pension funds fail
to provide all new teachers with sufficient retirement benefits.
«The governor's proposed
changes to ECS and special education
funding, coupled with his proposal
to require towns
to pick up one - third of the cost of teacher
pension costs, will make it impossible for small towns
to fund education without staggering increases in local property taxes,» said Betsy Gara, Executive Director of the Connecticut Council of Small Towns.
3) National: David Webber urges a rule
change by the Labor Department
to ensure that public
pension trustees act in the interest of public employees, and not use
pension fund money
to promote outsourcingto private, for - profit companies that kill public jobs.
That
changed, though, in 2007, when lawmakers and Rell adopted a proposal from Treasurer Denise L. Nappier
to borrow roughly $ 2 billion and deposit it into the cash - starved
pension fund.
More importantly, these allocations don't
change much over time, because
pension fund managers are less likely
to chase performance and buy what's hot.
If the
pension contained mutual
funds, the disbursed amount may differ from the amount quoted
to you when you spoke
to the representative because stock prices may have
changed between your conversation and the processing of the transaction.
Janet's
fund will need
to keep a record of Janet's request
to change the payment rules for her
pension.
Phased switching or lifestyling, often the default investment option for
pensions, was designed
to help maintain the level of annuity that people can buy by gradually investing their
funds in assets that
change in line with annuity rates as they approach retirement.
Phased switching or lifestyling, often the default investment option for
pensions, was designed
to help maintain the level of annuity that people can buy by gradually investing their
funds in assets that
change in line with annuity rates as they approach retirement approaches.