The most important clue is their behaviour: particularly
changing conscious level.
Not exact matches
Preliminary conclusion: Whitehead remains, in Collingwood's view, vague concerning the distinction between
change on the
level below consciousness and development on the
conscious level.
I remember that
change can happen on many
levels, and even though I might not be
conscious of something, that doesn't mean it's not working.
Any
changes you make on a
conscious level is temporary, any
changes you make with your subconscious is lasting and effortless.
The optional dynamic steering once again provokes ire — in steady corners you can actually feel the
level of assistance and ratio
changing, which makes directing the car through a corner a much more
conscious exercise than it should be.
So while I'm confident of a step - up here, based on the revenue / earnings drivers I've fully confirmed already (vs. those still to be confirmed), I'm also
conscious that
changes in fee rates / AUME, sterling, possible new business investment, etc. could eat into this earnings step - up, and / or a new revenue & earnings equilibrium might simply re-emerge (albeit, at higher
levels).
The Pine Island glacier is grounded on continental bedrock below sea
level, which means that warming ocean water could penetrate far inland beneath the shelf, without anyone being
conscious of any
change.
While we consciously have very good reasons for making a
change, at a less
conscious level we are also holding on to commitments and assumptions that go against the very
change we wish to make.
For growth and
change to take place, a couple needs to move into a
conscious level of functioning.