Not exact matches
The preponderance of current data indicates that the most likely cause of the current speed of
change is
human pollution.
Vestigial features, study of ebryonic development, biogeography, DNA sequencing, examining pseudogenes, study of endogenous retroviruses, labratory direct examination of natural selection in action in E-Coli bacteria, lactose intolerance in
humans, the peppered moth's colour
change in reaction to industrial
pollution, radiotrophic fungi at Chernobyl all add to the modern evolutionary synthesis.
If the world continues to accept disappearing tree - cover, land degradation, the expansion of deserts, the loss of plant and animal species, air and water
pollution, and the
changing chemistry of the atmosphere it will also have to accept economic decline and social disintegration... such disintegration would bring
human suffering on a scale that has no precedent...» 7
Finally, there is increased anxiety concerning climate
change — with some environmentalists demonising
human beings, consumer - based Western cultures castigating poorer nations for their waste and
pollution, and little attempt to think more profoundly about what a more ecologically - aware approach to our world may demand from such societies.
Tangible proof can be found by studying vestigial features, ebryonic development, biogeography, DNA sequencing, pseudogenes, endogenous retroviruses, labratory direct examination of natural selection in action in E-Coli bacteria, lactose intolerance in
humans, the peppered moth's colour
change in reaction to industrial
pollution, radiotrophic fungi at Chernobyl... all of these things add to the modern evolutionary synthesis.
There is still little interest in
changing the way growth is measured, but many of our leaders have now recognized that the
pollution caused by industrial development threatens the
human future.
Earth Day focused its attention on fundamentally
changing human attitudes and behavior about plastics and catalyzing a significant reduction in plastic
pollution across the world.
«A doomer is one who believes that problems of ecological overshoot, such as over population, climate
change,
pollution and especially peak oil, will cause the collapse of industrial civilization, and, a significant
human population die - off.
Can anybody fathom the magnitude and depth of harm galamsey has cost the Republic of Ghana in terms of
human resource abuses, land degradation, evil consequences on farming, water
pollution and evil climate
change (s).
Modern living produces multi-interactional environmental
pollution but the
changes in
human morbidity, including neurological disease is remarkable and points to environmental influences.»
When Rajan Chakrabarty, Ph.D., an assistant research professor at the Desert Research Institute, began looking into the regional inventories of
human - produced sources of carbon aerosol
pollution in South Asia, considered to be a climate
change hot spot, he knew something was missing.
Human - induced climate
change, which affects temperature, precipitation and the nature of extreme events, is increasingly driving biodiversity loss and the reduction of nature's contributions to people, worsening the impact of habitat degradation,
pollution, invasive species and the overexploitation of natural resources.»
«People rely on bees and pollinating insects for a large proportion of our food, yet
humans have paid the bees back with habitat destruction, insecticides, climate
change and air
pollution.
But our love of dolphins might not be enough to save them from extinction brought on by overfishing,
pollution, climate
change and other environmental affronts perpetrated by
humans.
«The amount and diversity of pesticides, pharmaceuticals and other industrial chemicals that
humans are releasing into the environment are increasing at rates that match or exceed recent increases in CO2 emissions, nutrient
pollution from nitrogen fertilizers, and other drivers of global
change,» Bernhardt said.
And that makes controlling O3
pollution from fossil fuel burning as important for climate
change as it is for
human and plant health.
«The Lancet report underscores the terrible consequences for
human health if we don't start reducing the dangerous carbon
pollution fueling climate
change — and dramatic benefits for people the world over from taking action now,» echoed Kim Knowlton, senior scientist and deputy director of the Science Center at the Natural Resources Defense Council, in a release.
Even the seemingly pristine Galápagos Islands, one of the most biologically rich and diverse ecosystems on the planet, face increasing threats as a result of climate
change, water
pollution, invasive plants and animals and other challenges related to
human activities.
Given the obvious concerns for
human ecological health — in terms of climate
change, heavy metal toxification, indoor air quality, air
pollution, plastics in the oceans, and things like that — there will be a large - scale trend to buildings that start to act like organisms.
Titled «Modeling Sustainability: Population, Inequality, Consumption, and Bidirectional Coupling of the Earth and
Human Systems,» the paper describes how the rapid growth in resource use, land - use change, emissions, and pollution has made humanity the dominant driver of change in most of the Earth's natural systems, and how these changes, in turn, have critical feedback effects on humans with costly and serious consequences, including on human health and well - being, economic growth and development, and even human migration and societal conf
Human Systems,» the paper describes how the rapid growth in resource use, land - use
change, emissions, and
pollution has made humanity the dominant driver of
change in most of the Earth's natural systems, and how these
changes, in turn, have critical feedback effects on
humans with costly and serious consequences, including on
human health and well - being, economic growth and development, and even human migration and societal conf
human health and well - being, economic growth and development, and even
human migration and societal conf
human migration and societal conflict.
«To mitigate the effects of climate
change, we can talk about two types of options: to attack it at its origin, by eliminating or reducing the
human factors that contribute to it (such as, reducing emissions, controlling
pollution, etc.) or developing strategies that allow for its effects to be reduced, such as, in the case that concerns us, increasing green areas in cities, using, for example, the tops of buildings as green roofs,» states the University of Seville researcher, Luis Pérez Urrestarazu.
«Environmental challenges like climate
change; biodiversity loss; desertification; air, water, soil, and ocean
pollution; and natural disasters rarely honor
human - made borders, so now is the time to start building mechanisms to create environmental wins.
Changes in that signature can indicate how an environmental threat — such as the gradual effects of climate
change or increasing levels of
human noise
pollution — disrupt animal communities.
Clean energy policies decrease not only carbon
pollution linked to climate
change but also other types of
pollution that harm
human health, such as sulfur oxides, nitrogen oxides, and fine particles that can damage the airways of
humans and other organisms.
Climate
change is projected to harm
human health by increasing ground - level ozone and / or particulate matter air
pollution in some locations.
Modern
human - driven forces, like climate
change and
pollution, are «orders of magnitude more destructive than what early
humans were doing,» Lyons said, but even at the dawn of
human civilizations, people were certainly having major — and unprecedented — ecological impacts, she said.
«In these habitats, the natural pollutants give us a glimpse into the future and help us think about what happens in ecosystems that suffer from
human - induced
changes or
pollution,» he said.
Aside from the obvious fact that there could hardly be a worse approach to climate
change, it certainly won't help address the equally important ecological destruction that is a result of
human overshoot — habitat destruction, ocean acidification, over-fishing, logging,
pollution, etc..
Here at mindbodygreen, we recognize that
human pollution and climate
change can too often feel like someone else's problem.
When a Norwegian scientist invents a way to shrink
humans to five inches tall as a means of combating
pollution, climate
change and sustainability, he decides to make the
change.
Climate Central, a nonpartisan collective of ecological experts, presents a succinct yet comprehensive overview of how
human - generated CO2
pollution is contributing to the crises we're experiencing as climate
change accelerates.
Studies agree that
human activities — climate
change, habitat destruction and
pollution — are the real culprits when some bird populations decline.
The main threats to all species on our planet are habitat destruction, climate
change,
pollution, and other
human activities.
The record numbers of stranded marine mammals we've seen in recent years indicates there is an urgent need for more science to help us all better understand how large - scale
human impacts, such as climate
change, overfishing and
pollution, may be affecting the health of these animals and their ocean environment.
Most recently,
human - caused factors such as air, noise, light, and water
pollution, climate
change, and the introduction of invasive species are having a large impact on natural resources here.
The point, of course, is that unlike the
pollution issues that characterized the 20th century,
human - propelled climate
change is not «in your face.»
If environmental groups and their backers want to see concrete progress on limiting the risk that
humans will propel dangerous global warming, they may need more than just additional money and better organization, but also a hard look at core strategies and a philosophy that has long cast climate
change as primarily a conventional
pollution problem, not a technology problem.
You'll be seeing more in The Times examining a question I posed here recently: Is
human - driven climate
change mainly a
pollution problem (legislate and regulate it away) or a technology problem (make non-polluting energy choices cheap and it goes away)?
Actions to reduce emissions of carbon
pollution and other greenhouse gases that accelerate climate
change will protect
human health in both the short...
Dr. Earle has dedicated her life to protecting and preserving our oceans against
human impacts like climate
change and ocean acidification, as well as overfishing and
pollution.
Thus, in the case of O3, the best way to reduce or remove the threat that warming - enhanced O3 poses to
human health — its climate
change risk — is almost certainly via the mitigation of nitrogen
pollution.
As with air
pollution, evidence suggests that
human - driven climate
change will, on average, worsen eutrophication in freshwater and marine systems.
Key elements include curbing
human carbon dioxide emissions to the atmosphere, improved control of local
pollution sources, reducing coastal habitat destruction, and better preparing coastal
human communities to withstand the amount of ocean acidification and climate
change that is unavoidable.
With a rapidly
changing climate, warmer weather, more intense rainfall, and
pollution caused by
human activity, we are perpetuating optimal conditions for harmful algal blooms.
A new study confirms that carbon
pollution has ended the era of the stable climate conditions that enabled the development of modern civilization High levels of carbon
pollution have caused global temperatures to rise above the slow -
changing, relatively stable conditions that existed «when
humans were figuring out where the climate — and rivers and sea levels — were most suited for living and farming.»
Tagaris, E., K. J. Liao, A. J. DeLucia, L. Deck, P. Amar, and A. G. Russell, 2009: Potential impact of climate
change on air
pollution - related
human health effects.
Climate
change is projected to harm
human health by increasing ground - level ozone and / or particulate matter air
pollution in some locations.
Policies and other strategies intended to reduce carbon
pollution and mitigate climate
change can often have independent influences on
human health.
It states that there is growing evidence that climate
change significantly exacerbates other major
human - induced pressures such as encroachment, deforestation, forest degradation, land - use
change,
pollution and overexploitation of wildlife resources.
The IPCC also reports that the resilience of many ecosystems around the world is likely to be exceeded this century by an unprecedented combination of climate
change; disturbances associated with climate
change, such as flooding, drought, wildfire, and insects; and other global
change - drivers, including land - use
changes,
pollution, habitat fragmentation, urbanization, and growing
human populations and economies.