apart from some crazy characters the film doesn't bring any game
changing ideas which an indie film should.
Not exact matches
Technology
changes constantly,
which means there's always a new
idea your business can try.
Still, passengers and regulators would have to become comfortable with the
idea of nobody sitting in the cockpit,
which would be a dramatic
change from the current rules for much of the world,
which require at least two people in the cockpit at all times.
These exchanges bring fresh
ideas, new perspectives and different ways of approaching problems,
which are all catalysts for the innovation
which fuels the economy and help us meet global challenges, ranging from climate
change to fossil fuel dependence and infectious diseases.
The most innovative corporate
idea from one of the Big Three in the last 30 years was GM's creation of the Saturn brand,
which gave the company a bold new design and
changed the way cars were sold and how salespeople were compensated.
It feels like we are
changing the world,
which means we are focused on success,
ideas and innovation every minute of every day.
Start - ups brimming with
ideas, industry leaders committed to facilitating
change, and an ecosystem in
which entrepreneurship can thrive are the key ingredients for a community of innovators.
However this
idea will
change the world in
which we live in, be more profitable than anything on this blog and let me assure you, this will create an unbelievable amount of jobs, from tech to sales to marketing to management etc. etc. etc..
«This is based on an
idea called «informational dominance»
which is the
idea that if you can capture every channel of information around a person and then inject content around them, you can
change their perception of what's actually happening,» Wylie said.
And when both are working together it also gives the client an
idea to implent all the
changes which come into his mind.....
Mr. Page, a former Merrill Lynch banker who founded an investment company in New York, Global Energy Capital, drew attention during the summer for a speech in
which he criticized the United States and other Western nations for a «hypocritical focus on
ideas such as democratization, inequality, corruption and regime
change» in Russia and other parts of the former Soviet Union.
The reason for this is that the nation's ideology had
changed where it had once trumpeted the
ideas of non-intervention and peace (except, of course, for the people of the South during their heroic attempt at independence) to those that glorified empire and war, largely based on the British model
which, ironically, was the system that America seceded from in 1776.
Action: Disable location services Who is this for: Anyone who feels uncomfortable with the
idea of being kept under surveillance How difficult is it: A bit of effort finding and
changing settings, and a bit of commitment to stay on top of any «updates» to privacy policies
which might try to revive location tracking.
The early users were highly proficient at games and provided many
ideas for the game's evolution («mods»), posting
changes to the game on line,
which encouraged others and started an upward spiral of sales, modifications and debugs.
So, my big
idea is to
change those numbers by starting with this relatively small $ 20M fund,
which will invest in about a dozen startups and create some wildly successful companies with gender diverse founding / exec teams.
Because business are almost always affected by
changes to social networks,
which is why the
idea is to share content users are interested in and will actually engage with.
The concept was eroded and Harvard, Yale, Princeton,
changed directions as more immigrated into the States thus bringing in
ideas and concepts that were contrary to the founding father's of said colleges, thusly eroding the premise on
which they were founded.
I believe that periodically there are GREAT TEACHERS who gather the finest
ideas of their day and find a way to repurpose or
change those teachings to evolve the society to
which they are born.
This is a very elegant flip - side to the
ideas in Francis Shaeffer's work, in
which the arts anticipate and even lead
changes in our societal condition through the connection of the artists to the spiritual to create their «great» works.
I have already indicated my own belief that
ideas and ideals
which offer hope of rescue or fulfillment to persons or groups where their vital interests are at stake can be powerful sources of constructive, even revolutionary,
change.
There is another kind of thinking in
which ideas, ideals, goals, are existential, efficacious, operationally powerful in leading to decisive
change in behavior.
People have rejected theism because they held untenable the
idea of a mind not subject to
change or to interaction with other beings, or a mind omnipotent in the sense that its power was all the power in existence, or a mind having precise knowledge of details of the future (or of all times from the standpoint of eternity), or a mind creating a first state of the cosmos at a finite time in the past, or knowing all suffering although it did not itself suffer, or an all - embracing mind
which in no sense could be identified with the universe, or one
which could in every sense be identified with it.
If a group like this fails in their predictions, they are then forced to adapt to their wrong
ideas and try to find a new meaning in
which they are forced to deal with a reality they can not
change.
Thomas Kuhn's work on paradigm shifts in the history of science presents the
idea that
changes or increases in our understanding not only fill out gaps in previous knowledge, but at times bring about a reorganisation of the structure of the theories or paradigms by
which previous
ideas were organised and understood.
The Apostle Paul blows right past our symbols and esoteric
ideas when he writes, «He will take our weak mortal bodies and
change them into glorious bodies like his own, using the same power with
which he will bring everything under his control.»
For example, he said, look at the Buddhist theory of impermanence, the
idea that the physical world is
changing by the second,
which was later proved by quantum physics in the movement of atoms.
In Resurrecting the
Idea of a Christian Society, Rusty Reno offers a brilliant, accessible and modestly optimistic take on the possibilities for positive
change in our current cultural climate, upon
which I offer some modestly pessimistic thoughts.
In the same spirit Santayana and Whitehead agree in objecting, like Nietzsche, to the
idea that
change in the natural world is controlled by «laws of nature,» viewing the laws rather as simply descriptions of what each unit to
which they apply «decides» to do itself (RB 301 - 302).
Think your new group is a marvelous
idea... people whose beliefs are
changing or those who have been abused, need a safe container in
which to express themselves.
It is to Meiklejohn's credit that he has some
idea of the gravity of the human problem
which such a
change in conviction entails.
To understand how
ideas change, we need to consider not only subjective needs and values but also the relations between actors who articulate
ideas and actors who provide an audience for these
ideas, the institutional contexts in
which these dynamics take place, and the larger social resources that institutions have at their disposal.
He focuses mainly on the
changing relations between laity and clergy and the ways in
which religious
ideas were produced.
Interestingly, the latter field of controversy was addressed specifically in a Time magazine interview with Dennis Sewell, author of The Political Gene: How Darwin's
Ideas Changed Politics,
which apparently deals with how Darwinism has been put to «sinister» political (ab) uses.
We're not pumping them full of self - empowering
ideas of
changing the world for the sake of fame and fortune (the direction of many youth enterprises,
which lack humility).
Furthermore, if we tell unbelievers that they need to
change their behavior in order to come to church or fit in with other believers, they may get the wrong
idea that becoming a Christian requires
changing behavior,
which it does not.
If
change really involves self - transcendence even, in certain circumstances, to a new essence, even though only in virtue of the dynamism of absolute Being,
which of course does not, let it be repeated, alter the fact that it is a question of self - transcendence; if matter and spirit are not simply disparate in nature but matter is in a certain way «solidified» spirit, the only significance of
which is to serve to make actual spirit possible, then an evolutionary development of matter towards spirit is not an inconceivable
idea.15 If there exists at all by virtue of the motion of absolute Being, a
change in the material order whereby this rises above itself, then this self - transcendence can only occur in the direction of spirit, because the absolute Being is spirit.
Anyone, therefore, who does not suppose that in a metaphysical sense more can simply come from less, must, precisely if he wishes to perceive in the production of
change through transitive causality a perspective open for «endless» becoming, introduce the
idea of infinite Being as the ground of the very possibility of any becoming
which involves an increase of being.
It is with the
idea and in the hope of advancing towards a solution of the problem that I here venture, basing my argument on the widest possible zoological and biological grounds, to put forward a coherent view of the «thinking Earth» in
which I believe we may find, undistorted but yet embodying the corrections required by a
change of order, the whole process of Life and of vitalization.
(ENTIRE BOOK) A planetary society is emerging
which makes requirements for human fulfillment that can not be met unless there are profound
changes in the
ideas, values, and power coalitions that now determine our priorities and shape our future.
The mistake lies in the assumption that
ideas are independent of the social conditions of action and, consequently, that they can be
changed without
changing the conditions
which produced them.
This world of ours is a new world, in
which the unity of knowledge, the nature of human communities, the order of society, the order of
ideas, the very notions of society and culture have
changed and will not return to what they have been in the past.
The experience hasn't killed my love of the church and I do feel naturally defensive when it is attacked, however, my
idea of church has
changed to a gathering where Jesus is present and Lord
which the visible church may or may not represent in varying degrees.
To
which I answer, Nobody in his right senses does, but see what this
change of world view has done to our
idea of God!
And they know
which ideas and practices
change lives.
I confess power includes in it some kind of relation (a relation to action or
change,) as indeed
which of our
ideas, of what kind soever, when attentively considered, does not?
«This world of ours is a new world,» wrote Robert Oppenheimer in 1963, «in
which the unity of knowledge, the nature of human communities, the order of society, the order of
ideas, the very notions of society and culture have
changed and will not return to what they have been in the past» (Saturday Review of Literature, June 29, 1963, p. 11).
This point of view,
which certainly seems to take dynamism as intrinsic to all our experience such that we have simple
ideas of relational events, of
change, is in keeping with the intent of Whitehead's belief in the primacy of process.
My thesis is that a planetary society is emerging
which sets requirements for human fulfillment for the species as a whole that can not be met unless there are profound
changes in the
ideas, values, and power coalitions that now determine our priorities and shape our politics.
Their «summons to disobedience», Pope Benedict preached, went «even to the point of disregarding definitive decisions of the Church's Magisterium, such as the question of women's ordination... Do we sense here anything of that configuration to Christ
which is the precondition for all true renewal, or do we merely sense a desperate push to do something to
change the Church in accordance with one's own preferences and
ideas?»
The
ideas presented might strike one as radical if not impossible, but on page 35 he well makes the case for trying, given the dramatic ways in
which family life can be
changed through failure.