Not exact matches
Political scientist Keith Brownsey of Mount Royal University argues the Liberals paid close attention to the many fumbles made by Harper's Tories on the energy file: failing to build solid relationships with First Nations, allowing environmental groups to seize the public - relations initiative, not asserting federal authority and handing provinces like B.C. and Quebec control of the political agenda, keeping Canada outside of the international consensus on climate change, and ignoring legitimate criticisms of the federal review
Political scientist Keith Brownsey of Mount Royal University argues the Liberals paid close attention to the many fumbles
made by Harper's Tories on the energy file: failing to build solid relationships with First Nations, allowing environmental groups to seize the public - relations initiative, not asserting federal authority and handing provinces like B.C. and Quebec control of the
political agenda, keeping Canada outside of the international consensus on climate change, and ignoring legitimate criticisms of the federal review
political agenda, keeping Canada outside of the international consensus on
climate change, and ignoring legitimate criticisms of the federal review process.
As director of the Nathan Cummings Foundation's Corporate &
Political Accountability program, Laura employs both grant
making and active ownership strategies to address the ways in which corporations can both advance and hinder progress on
climate change and inequality.
Theories of global
climate change threaten the energy companies so they manipulate the facts to
make it look like a «normal» cycle and their
political operatives flood the airwaves and Internet with dubious «proof».
Cannadine concludes that throughout her premierships she was the dominant figure in British public life, and she not only
made the
political weather, but went some way towards
changing the
political climate, too.
The complex
political economy of
climate change, he argues,
makes a targets - based approach overly rigid and costly.
Miliband is
making a concerted effort to push next week's Paris
climate change talks up the
political agenda, with a Guardian article saying the UK should put in legislation a target to eradicate carbon emissions completely.
Citing the environmental, economic and
political ramifications of President Donald Trump's pullout from the Paris
climate accord — as well as the perilous effects of inconsistent weather and more intense storms that have already befallen their cities and counties — more than 200 New York officials on Monday called on state Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli to divest the state Common Retirement Fund of companies that contribute to man -
made climate change.
Amid his probe into ExxonMobil, Schneiderman sought out activist businessman Tom Steyer, who has
made climate change a major issue in his
political giving.
This could have implications for the quality of the
political decisions countries and regions
make to prevent and adapt to
climate change, warn the researchers behind the study from the University of Copenhagen.
These remnants of the Cold War are also an example of an unanticipated
political issue that could arise because of the effects of
climate change, particularly as countries seek to establish a presence in the Arctic as warming
makes it increasingly accessible.
the type and effectiveness of local
political leadership and input in larger decision -
making questions — northern institutions often lack the time, mandate and funding to address
climate change impacts — though emerging leaders in Canada and Alaska are proving to be an exception to this pattern;
Yet the context was hard to miss, as Katrina proved a devastating
political event for President George W. Bush, whose administration had
made a habit of sowing doubts about
climate change.
Lertzman explains that everyone will respond to
climate change differently, depending on their temperament, personality, schedule, etc. «Some people will find that it
makes sense for them to become involved on a
political level; others may be more interested in fashion and want to focus on engaging with sustainable clothes,» she explains.
After listening to eco-warrior Paul Hawken share how we can affect
climate change; actor, activist, and best - seller Hill Harper
make an important statement about
political divisiveness; best - seller Kate Fagan discuss suicide in athletes; and Lisa Merkle give a sobering reminder that yogis get cancer too in the first studio session of the day, I was ready to process all that I'd taken in — and, of course, refuel my body for the afternoon.
The
political climate has
changed so much, so I've gone back to the types of products I was
making back then.
A prime example of how Hollywood reflected the
changing political climate: When Lewis Milestone's film was
made, the Soviet Union was an ally but after WWII some of its makers removed their name, while others like writer Lilian Hellman were blacklisted.
How do you
make a film that speaks to the current
political climate when the
climate changes by the hour?
Young people learn more about
climate change,
make a short film to communicate their ideas, and show it to their
political representative.
We've had three mayors and city councils that have had the
political courage to invest in DCPS, to provide us with the cover, the legislation, and the
climate to
make tough
changes.
Oceans brings together the work of over 20 artists who explore the cultural,
political, and biological dimensions of the oceans, examining the effects of human -
made issues, such as
climate change and rising sea - levels, and reimagining human's relationship to the planet.
The group exhibition «Tidalectics» presents 13 artists whose distinctive works cast oceanic perspectives on the cultural,
political and biological dimensions of the oceans, examining the effects of human -
made issues, such as
climate change and sea - level rise, while reimagining human and «more - than - human» relationships.
In Liquidity inc., Steyerl
makes one of her characteristic intellectual leaps and connects extreme financial events to extreme
climate events: the jet stream of money
changes direction when the Dow Jones collapses, then suddenly a gonzo weather forecaster, masked in black, is gesturing across the most
political of politically geographical maps you ever saw — noting failed states and off - shore tax havens, isobars indicating flows of capital rather than weather fronts.
Once the politicians started
making grandiose claims and issuing apocalyptic scenarios,
climate change became — in the minds of the public — a
political excuse for social engineering and taxation.
But when
political leaders like Senator Inhofe deny the problem of
climate change, they do not
make the problem disappear — instead, they compound it by blocking constructive solutions.
The opponents want to prevent
climate change laws and regulations from being
made for
political, philosophical or economic reasons.
None of this is
makes it any easier to build the
political will to confront a uniquely difficult problem like
climate change.
Compare the year - to - year scale at which humans
make policy decisions, reflected in our
political frameworks, to the multi-millennial consequences of today's energy choices, as delineated in «Consequences of twenty - first - century policy for multi-millennial
climate and sea - level change,» the important recent commentary in Nature Climate Change by a host of top climate scientists, including Pierreh
climate and sea - level
change,» the important recent commentary in Nature Climate Change by a host of top climate scientists, including Pierrehu
change,» the important recent commentary in Nature
Climate Change by a host of top climate scientists, including Pierreh
Climate Change by a host of top climate scientists, including Pierrehu
Change by a host of top
climate scientists, including Pierreh
climate scientists, including Pierrehumbert.
With vast economic,
political, and eco-problems (other than
climate change) to ponder, and with the challenges of
making a living and raising a family in increasingly daunting circumstances, the attention of many people is on a lot of other things in addition to
climate change.
There's no doubt that for us to take on
climate change in a serious way would involve
making some tough
political choices, and you know, understandably, I think the American people right now have been so focused and will continue to be focused on our economy and jobs and growth that, you know, if the message is somehow we're going to ignore jobs and growth simply to address
climate change, I don't think anybody's going to go for that.
Talking, rather than acting, remains a
political option because the electorates on which the pols rely for their jobs are not sufficiently threatened by
climate change, personally, to
make it an issue on which politicians have to act.
In his signature manner, he has generally shied away from the careful
political - speak adopted by many of his head - of - state contemporaries when discussing
climate change solutions, striking an earnest tone on the issue which has
made him popular among environmentalists.
As the tit - for - tat attacks from the tail ends of the spectrum on
climate change continue unabated, what was once presumed influence on the part of these scientists will likely become real influence on public opinion and
political decision -
making, and these scientists will be partly responsible.
... China insists in the position to
make the framework [United Nations Framework Convention on
Climate Change] the
political and legal basis for the global regime and we do not see the necessity or need to rewrite or interpret the convention.
Perhaps some
climate activists fear that support of adaptation efforts would be akin to recognizing that
climate change is, after all, not as dire a crisis as it is being
made out to be through polarizing
political rhetoric.
That
climate change is now an APS focus group topic
makes a strong statement, but not a
political one: it simply reflects the maturity of the field.
Because the one thing I'm sure of is this: the reality of our current
political situation
makes it a distinct probability that we don't decarbonize quickly enough to prevent
climate change.
But let's
make sure the research is not simply «agenda driven», i.e. to support a
political agenda, such as the implementation of a direct or indirect «carbon tax», but real scientific studies to clear up the many uncertainties regarding the relative importance of natural and anthropogenic attribution of past
climate change, for example.
The
political price of asking Americans to
make real sacrifices in the service of fighting
climate change would be too steep for any Congress to accept and hence would threaten other legislative agendas which progressives hold dear.
The IPCC is a
political — not a scientific — organisation that exists to provide politicians with scientific information which can be used to justify actions politicians may want to take by using as justification for the actions the excuse of man -
made global
climate change.
Nonetheless, the chart does a good job of demonstrating just how hard it is to get people to accept immediate sacrifices in order to protect long - term
climate stability: they are not fully exposed to the risks, and they have ample opportunity to fob them off on others, so as to avoid
making changes in how they live their own lives and how the
political and economic systems in their states operate.
It's been think tanks funded by fossil fuel interests and Republican politicians that have
made climate change a
political issue.
So what to
make of a study from the Yale Project on
Climate Change Communication (backed up by a similar Washington Post-ABC News poll) showing that the majority of Americans, across the
political spectrum, support the limiting of carbon pollution from power plants — also known as the very thing that the EPA proposed?
No matter what
political committees try to absolve corruption of
climate science of the Climatic Research Unit (CRU) and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), they can not hide the complete failure of the computer models to make a single accurate pred
climate science of the Climatic Research Unit (CRU) and the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change (IPCC), they can not hide the complete failure of the computer models to make a single accurate pred
Climate Change (IPCC), they can not hide the complete failure of the computer models to
make a single accurate prediction.
At least to those of us who can expect to be
made «redundant» as soon as the
political - green -
climate change complex achieves the power (coincidentally, ALWAYS a critical feature of
climate change amelioration strategies) to «
make it happen».
As man -
made climate fears subside and the scientific, economic, cultural and
political case evaporates for
climate change «action,» expect more and more green activists to take up the mantle for «laughing gas» as a possible replacement eco-scare.
Getting this context clearly understood as the premise for policy discussion is important now if progress is to be
made in shaping the future in ways that avoid potential
political pitfalls as the impacts of
climate change accelerate.
Chairman Eric Schmidt said the world's biggest Internet search company
made a mistake in funding a
political group that opposes U.S. action on
climate change.
While mayors and local governments can not comprehensively tackle
climate change alone, their sizeable
political and economic clout may
make them an important force in national and global sustainability initiatives.
The advocates have expressed their displeasure with the economic results (IIRC you had it posted here about advocates wanting to
change the future value to something unrealistic to
make the window 100 to years compared to the 30 to 50 years in current analysis), and are proposing
political solutions in the flavor of stopping CO2, not controlling the effects of
climate change.
All it would take to
make climate alarmism and the
political changes it demands legitimate, then, would be for some new scientific discovery.