The IPCC
chapter on climate models appears to justify use of the models by saying they show an increase in temperature when CO2 is increased.
Not exact matches
The most common scenario type is based
on outputs from
climate models and receives most attention in this
chapter.
Its seven
chapters discuss the global
climate models, forcings and feedbacks, solar forcing of the
climate, and observations
on temperature, the icecaps, the water cycle and oceans, and weather.»
JC note: Pursuant to Nic's post
on «The IPCC's alteration of Forster & Gregory's
model - independent
climate sensitivity results,» he has sent a letter to Gabi Hegerl, who was coordinating lead author
on chapter 9 of the IPCC AR4.
Several of my review comments, especially
on Chapter 6 in the June review, speak directly to problems in the
climate models.
Recent work (e.g., Hurrell 1995, 1996; Thompson and Wallace 1998; Corti et al., 1999) has suggested that the observed warming over the last few decades may be manifest as a change in frequency of these naturally preferred patterns (
Chapters 2 and 7) and there is now considerable interest in testing the ability of
climate models to simulate such weather regimes (
Chapter 8) and to see whether the greenhouse gas forced runs suggest shifts in the residence time or transitions between such regimes
on long time - scales.
In most cases, these range from about 2 to 4.5 C per doubled CO2 within the context of our current
climate — with a most likely value between 2 and 3 C.
On the other hand,
chapter 9 describes attempts ranging far back into paleoclimatology to relate forcings to temperature change, sometimes directly (with all the attendant uncertainties), and more often by adjusting
model parameters to determine the
climate sensitivity ranges that allow the
models to best simulate data from the past — e.g., the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM).
The introduction to the first
chapter, «
Climate models and their limitations» cites the Rosenberg 2010 conclusion
on uncertainties related to GCM outputs as bases for projecting climatic change impacts:
However, as Essex and McKitrick point out in the
chapter on «
Climate Theory versus
Models and Metaphors» in their book «Taken by Storm,» that no computer
model has a grid size small enough to include any of them.
To better assess confidence in the different
model estimates of
climate sensitivity, two kinds of observational tests are available: tests related to the global
climate response associated with specified external forcings (discussed in
Chapters 6, 9 and 10; Box 10.2) and tests focused
on the simulation of key feedback processes.
Lupo worked
on the
climate models chapter about which he said, «It represents the problems and benefits of working with computer
models as well as highlighting the current techniques, strategies, and shortcomings.»
This
chapter focuses
on process understanding and considers observations, theory and
models to assess how clouds and aerosols contribute and respond to
climate change.
I posted the comment
on your blog because I thought you would be interested in the math of their stochastic
model of
climate fluctations in
Chapter 7 and give an assesment of the their methodolgy.