Not exact matches
Despite an occasional nod to Edmund Burke or Friedrich Hayek, most American conservatives actively engaged in
political life are singularly uninterested in attaining clarity about the
character of conservatism as an intellectual
movement.
While the
character of certain
movements and groups is to a large extent defined by sociological criteria, such as the earlier so - called Frontier religion or now the Buchmean (Oxford group) Movement, which Allan Eister has recently analyzed in his book Drawing Room Conversion, we find that the more definitely a religious group is a religious group — as distinct from an economic,
political, or cultural association — the more important, both for members
of the group and students
of it, will become its worship and its theology.
Here it must be emphasized that some
of these
movements had no
political character.
In a film that doesn't dig into the details
of its portrayed
political movement, nor develops its ensemble
of supporting
characters, this rings the truest.
Two - time Oscar winner Cate Blanchett plays 13 different
characters in a series
of vignettes embodying the artistic and
political manifestos
of Communism, Dadaism, Futurism, Minimalism, Surrealism, and other
movements in this film by German visual artist Julian Rosefldt.
As a material «insensibl [e] to contradiction», wax's ability to take imprints
of the unique landmarks
of the skin connects it to strategies
of surveillance and data collection that measure visual, behavioural or chemical characteristics, connecting Hershman Leeson's hotel tableau to her later invented
character.14 The artist described Roberta Breitmore as «my flippant effigy» and «a dark, shadowy, animus cadaver».15 Similarly, The Dante Hotel was for the artist simultaneously a scene
of death and «a means
of survival».16 As such Thek's and Hershman Leeson's volatile effigies connect two very different bodies
of work and different
political movements — the counterculture, gay rights, women's liberation — to make visible the restraints placed on the subject.
What we should take away from the whole sorry episode is that this zeal for challenging the
character of climate - change skeptics — while excusing both the
political / financial connections, and sloppy science,
of true believers because their cause is supposedly noble — represents the final degeneration
of the global warming
movement into pure politics.
But it will probably be a while before the elitist
character of the green
movement is recognised and an organised
political response formed.