Demographics and respiratory
characteristics of comparison groups at initial evaluation for designation of air pollution victim status
Not exact matches
Planned subgroup analyses involved
comparisons between different approaches to delivery for four key
characteristics:
group or individual or self - administered, length
of programme (same or different), index child involvement or adjunctive treatment.
Many
of the
comparisons that were undertaken were invalidated by the fact that more than one
of the four key
characteristics (i.e.
group versus one to one, length; child involvement; adjunctive treatment) was varied.
This could be explored through the performance
of secondary academies over a longer timeframe (e.g. five years or more), and
of primary academies, including a
comparison with non-academy schools with similar
characteristics, and their impact on different pupil
groups.
A
comparison of students» data from before the lottery confirms that the two
groups are similar with respect to all
characteristics we can observe.
In A
Comparison of Quantitative and Qualitative Hedge Funds (via CXO Advisory
Group blog) Ludwig Chincarini has compared the performance
characteristics of quantitative and qualitative hedge funds.
This
comparison allows the underwriter to place you in a
group of people with similar risk
characteristics.
The main differences observed between the
groups occurred in the
comparison of secondary sex
characteristics.
This
comparison allows the underwriter to place you in a
group of people with similar risk
characteristics.
Given the methodologic limits, including lack
of clearly defined intervention
characteristics, lack
of a
comparison group, retrospective collection, and lack
of key measures for certain children at certain times, the intervention results were limited.
Findings suggest substantial improvement via an intensive approach for young children with autism; however, important differences in
group assignment at baseline, difficulties with systematic measurement overtime, the lack
of reported treatment fidelity or adherence
characteristics, and the small number
of children in the
comparison group limit interpretation
of these findings.
Table 1 reports selected baseline
characteristics of randomized teens; detailed
group comparisons are available elsewhere.18
Summary: (To include
comparison groups, outcomes, measures, notable limitations) The study evaluated therapist
characteristics, therapist process, and family process in a short - term systems - behavioral model
of family intervention [now called Functional Family Therapy (FFT)-RSB-.
Summary: (To include
comparison groups, outcomes, measures, notable limitations) The present study examines the relationship among parent
characteristics (hostility, depression, and overall parenting skills) and child bullying and the effects
of the ACT Parents Raising Safe Kids (ACT - PRSK) program [now called the ACT Raising Safe Kids Program] on reducing early childhood bullying.
Many
of the
comparisons that were undertaken were invalidated by the fact that more than one
of the four key
characteristics (i.e.
group versus one to one, length; child involvement; adjunctive treatment) was varied.
Planned subgroup analyses involved
comparisons between different approaches to delivery for four key
characteristics:
group or individual or self - administered, length
of programme (same or different), index child involvement or adjunctive treatment.