Sentences with phrase «charge way more money»

At the very least, most other companies will charge you way more money, and give you a waiting period.

So even though they still charge way more money than my midwife charges, they're still not insured for malpractice anyway.

Not exact matches

LinkedIn could (eventually) make money by taking a cut of any financial transactions between parties (as Fiverr does), by charging service providers a fee to be featured more prominently in certain categories, or in a myriad of other ways.

LinkedIn could (eventually) make money by taking a cut of any financial transactions between parties (such as Fiverr does), or by charging service service providers a fee to be featured more prominently in certain categories, or in a myriad of other ways.

Bank5 Connect doesn't charge anything for overdraft transfers and incoming wires, so you have more than one way to transfer money into your account without undue costs.

Valet Anywhere tried to make on - demand parking work for several months in New York, but founder Robert Kao says «there was no way» to charge a customer more money than it cost to pay for labor and the parking space.

the headline was just poorly chosen, it was more meant like you can't charge people for letting them send their own money, the important part is «The only way to earn money with wallets is to provide a service on top of it.»

But sneaking in fees, charges, or add - on services are just ways for a lender to milk more money out of a borrower.

Up front we have a few world - class players surrounded by some serious pretenders... Sanchez is by far the most accomplished player in our attack but the controversy surrounding his contractual mishandling could see him go before the window closes or most definitely by season's end... obviously a mistake by both parties involved, as Sanchez's exploits have never been more on display than in North London, but the club's irresponsible wage structure and lack of real intent have been the real undoing in this mess... Lacazette, who I think has some world - class skills as a front man, will only be as good as the players and system around him, which is troubling due to our current roster and Wenger's love of sideways passing... Walcott should have been sold years ago, enough said, and Welbeck should never have been brought in from the get - go... both of these players have suffered numerous injuries over their respective careers and neither are good enough to overcome such difficulties: not to mention, they both are below average first - touch players, which should be the baseline test for any player coming to a Wenger - led Arsenal team... Perez should have been played wide left or never purchased at all; what a huge waste of time and money, which is ridiculous considering our penny pinching ways and the fact that fans had been clamoring for a real striker for years... finally Giroud, the fact that he stills wears the jersey is a direct indictment of this club's failure to get things right... this isn't necessarily an attack on Giroud because I think he has some highly valued skills, but not for a team that has struggled to take their sideways soccer to the next level, as his presence slows their game even more, combined with our average, at best, finishing skills... far too often those in charge have either settled or chosen half - measures and ultimately it is us that suffer because no matter what happens Wenger, Gazidis and Kroenke will always make more money whereas we will always be the ones paying for their mistakes... so every time someone suggests we should just shut - up and support the team just think of all the sacrifices you've made along the way and simply reply... f *** off

I'm so sick of people telling those of us who are disgruntled fans to relax and give this club time to correct itself... for anyone who believes that taking a wait - and - see approach is appropriate at this juncture they should take a good long look at themselves in the mirror because they are a big part of the problem... no other «big» club's fans would stand for this shit for nearly as long as we have... think about it, we've witnessed a changing of the guard at every major club in England, Spain, France and Germany in the last several years because those «big» clubs failed to live up to expectations (Barcelona, Real Madrid, Bayern, PSG, Chelsea, ManU, ManCity etc...)... for some reason, many fans have become as fragile as our current manager, believing that there couldn't possibly be a suitable replacement, even though everyone of these clubs have found multiple replacements and still achieved far more than our club... this mindset has been created by an organization that has been milking it's fans, telling countless lies (no world class players available) and lowering expectations every since they rolled out the biggest lie of all: that we couldn't spend because of the new stadium but once it was paid off we could compete with any team in the world... this organization is rotting from the inside out and if we don't demand that those in charge put soccer first this despicable behaviour won't end with Wenger's ridiculous 2 year contract... I think the real fear isn't that a suitable replacement doesn't exist, but that this organization is so money hungry and poorly mismanaged that we will sink even lower by choosing our next coach the same way they choose our players, on the cheap... even so, we need to see what mustache will do if left to his own devices so he will have to show his true colours... only then can we purge this club and start anew

No county officials were charged with wrongdoing, but federal prosecutors allege that Dean and Adam Skelos improperly influenced the awarding of the contract to an environmental company as a way to get Adam Skelos more money from the company — which had hired him as a consultant.

Starting in 2012, money is likely to become an even more important concern for students as universities in England are allowed to charge undergraduates up to # 9000 per year ($ 14,200 or $ 10,300) in tuition fees as a way of dealing with government funding cuts.

Overall I realize it is scam site and DO NOT recommned that you waste your time and money, and the risk of them charging you WAY more than what you had approved of... You will NOT get your money back...... And I never signed up for a 1 year term....

Some online dating sites charge for their services, but there are also some great free services out there too, both which can save you money compared to the more traditional ways of dating.

Some might say that it's a good excuse to see the film on the big screen, but considering the way that Smith has been marketing «Red State» (taking the show on the road and charging big bucks to see it), the whole thing stinks of a last - ditch effort to bleed more money from his fans.

Another way to phrase it is «we want to keep charging you as long as we can so we will drag this process out since that's how we make more money».

His point is well taken though — if you know your own way around the market, you won't need to pay more in fees and charges for other people to manage your money for you, like you'll see at most investment brokers.

Competing vendors sometimes charge you a percent of assets, make you use their mutual funds, or have other ways of charging more money over time.

It's often just a way for your grocer to charge more money for less food: • A plastic container of cut - up cantaloupe chunks costs $ 2.99 for one serving.

This is one way to lower our scores and charge us more money.

As long as the system requires so much time to be spent on the stages, experts, etc., then there is no possible way that a Walmart - owned firm could make money without charging more than enough to cover the costs of that protracted system and make a profit — a profit that would have to cover not only all the expenses of running the law department and paying the lawyers in it, but also producing a return on investment to the shareholders of Walmart for their foray into legal services.

Why not charge more than everyone else, and If you close a transaction very quickly without much in the way of time involvement and financial expense and you morally believe that you have taken too much of their money, refund a portion thereof on an individual per - transaction basis.