Sentences with phrase «charged on both sides of the transaction»

Further, as this amount is charged on both sides of the transaction (buying & selling), hence you have to pay a total of Rs 500 for the complete transactions (way too expensive than Zerodha).

In addition, as this amount is charged on both sides of the transaction (buying & selling), hence you have to pay a total of Rs 500 for the complete transactions (way too expensive compared to a total brokerage of Rs 40 on both sides of transactions in Zerodha).

Not exact matches

The person selling the list could potentially be working both sides of the transaction, convincing borrowers to pay for the list as well as charging the lender to be included on the list.

If you've never had reason to be on the other side of a credit card transaction — the merchant instead of the consumer — you may not know that credit card companies charge merchants fees for the privilege of processing transactions with their card.

Just would like to sum up with this question to your fellow editor about a curious number (pardon the pun): Under the «NO foreign transaction fee» Marriott Rewards Premier Visa section recommending it, it reads «Out of the three cards, this is the only one that's seriously worth considering for everyday use» despite it being «one of only two» cards listed side by side that have «annual fees» after the first year (with Barb's choice the second one that loves charging 2.5 % «foreign transaction fees» upfront / from the start on all foreign transactions rebating «afterwards» as «reward points» statement all of them «except on returns and cash advances» where the fees remain); however this article shows «more than three cards» (though granted the Amazon.ca Visa is unavailable now for the new applicant plus the missing Mogo Visa is a prepaid one and whereas this year's (2017) new $ 149 annual fee HSBC Premier World Elite MC is exclusively for their premier clients only) so which «three cards» in that statement there would we talking about here?

Just would like to sum up with this question to your fellow editor about a curious number (pardon the pun): Under the «NO foreign transaction fee» Marriott Rewards Premier Visa section recommending it, it reads «Out of the three cards, this is the only one that's seriously worth considering for everyday use» despite it being «one of only two» cards listed side by side that have «annual fees» after the first year (with Barb's choice the second one that loves charging 2.5 % «foreign transaction fees» upfront / from the start on all foreign transactions rebating «afterwards» as «reward points» statement all of them «except on returns and cash advances» where the fees remain); however this article shows «more than three cards» (though granted the Amazon.ca Visa is unavailable now for the new applicant plus the missing Mogo Visa is a prepaid one and whereas this year's (2017) new $ 149 annual fee HSBC Premier World Elite MC is exclusively for their premier clients only) so which «three cards» in that statement there would we talking about here?

The methods insurers use to determine the rates they charge to policy holders depend upon a wide range of factors, some of which are directly tied to those classifications on both the insurer and customer sides of the transaction.

On the negative side, it also gives some control of Bitcoin transactions to a third party that can charge their own fees, something that a lot of people see as going against the fundamentals of Bitcoin.