Sentences with phrase «charged to court where»

Not exact matches

Rhodes is due to be arraigned in Queens Criminal Court where he will face nine hate crime charges including third - degree assault, second - degree unlawful imprisonment and first - degree harassment.
In a filing in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, Winterkorn was one of six defendants charged in an alleged scheme where they knew VW vehicles did not meet U.S. emissions standards and used software to cheat the U.S. testing process.
The 48 - year - old Moulton, a bearded, heavily tattooed man, made an appearance in provincial court in Saint John, where two previous charges against him were withdrawn and a dozen new counts were presented to the judge by the prosecution.
Every state has statutes dictating where assets will be passed after a person's death, how to handle the decisions of an incapacitated person, and how the court will select a person to be in charge of these decisions.
Attorneys for Utah polygamist sect leader Warren Jeffs are asking a court to delay his extradition to Texas, where he faces charges including aggravated sexual assault of a child, until Utah authorities decide whether to retry him.
Managing director of Midland Red bus operator, Steve Burd, as he leaves Coventry Magistrates» Court last week after a previous hearing, where Midland Red (South) Ltd, today pleaded guilty to two charges brought under Health and Safety law after an inquiry into the 2015 deaths of a passenger and a pedestrian in Coventry city centre.
The ever vigilant state charged her with illegal discrimination and took her to court, where the California Supreme Court ruled against her appeal to the free exercise of her relicourt, where the California Supreme Court ruled against her appeal to the free exercise of her reliCourt ruled against her appeal to the free exercise of her religion.
A wide - ranging child sex scandal, where priests have been accused of molesting young parishioners in the United States and in Europe, has since led to criminal charges in cases still pending before the courts.
While reacting to Monday's verdict by Justic Buba, the State Government hailed the ruling, and disclosed that Government would immediately seek arraignment and prosecution of the suspects at the Lagos High Court where charges are pending before Honourable Justice Lawal Akapo.
Top Paris attacks suspect Salah Abdeslam has been transferred from Belgium to France where he is expected to be charged in court on Wednesday, French prosecutors said.
«The defendant who was the target in this case, George Maziarz, plead to a penal law charge where the penalty was $ 1,000,» Assistant Attorney General Christopher Baynes said in court.
«That the applicant, who knows full well that she is on bail in the United Kingdom where she is being investigated for several financial crimes, and that she would not be able to leave that country in view of the ongoing investigation and imminent trial, is seeking the order of this honourable court for the charge before this honourable court to be amended to include her name on the face of the charge in order for her to escape from investigation and prosecution in the United Kingdom under the guise that she is coming to face her trial before this honourable court and also to scuttle the trial before this honourable court
Cecile said he remembers a few instances where charges were lodged against relatives of a judge or a former city court employee, causing all the local judges to recuse themselves.
Kruger, Turano and Lipsky were among eight men busted Thursday on corruption «pay to play» charges filed in Manhattan federal court, where the senator is accused of collecting more than $ 1 million in bribes.
Today, Tuesday 15/05/18 some armed security men whisked away our illegally detained Leader Sheikh Ibraheem Zakzaky from where he has been in detention illegally in Abuja, and brought him to court 4 in Kaduna standing trial for some trumped up charges that include murder.
Some armed security men whisked away our illegally detained Leader Sheikh Ibraheem Zakzaky from where he has been in detention illegally in Abuja, and brought him to court 4 in Kaduna standing trial for some trumped up charges that include murder.
If they continue to be evasive and fail to comply with criminal summon issued on them by the Federal High Court, Lokoja to appear on 28th March, 2018 to answer to the criminal charges of Conspiracy and Unlawful Possession of Prohibited Firearms against them, the Force, will obtain Warrant of Arrest for the arrest of Senator Dino Melaye and Mohammed Audu and will definitely declare them wanted throughout the country and on INTERPOL platform for them to be arrested in any country where ever they are sighted and handed over to the Nigeria Police Force for continuation of their trial.
The home secretary said the government disagrees strongly with the European court of human rights» (ECHR) ruling last month preventing Qatada's deportation to Jordan, where he is wanted on terror charges.
Alexandria Duval appears in Albany County Court to waive extradition to Hawaii where she faces a murder charge in connection with the death of her twin sister.
At a time, we had to write to the courts where the charges were filed to give us some time in order to bring them to court,» a source at the EFCC said.
The felony convictions of former Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver, now suddenly former assemblyman, had to send cold chills through the Dean Skelos camp, where the former majority leader of the state Senate was, along with his son, on trial across Foley Square in Manhattan federal court on similar bribery and influence - peddling charges.
The Ondo State Police Commissioner, Mrs. Hilda Harrison, while parading the suspects, said the victim had been taken to Ile - Ife, Osun State where she was receiving treatment, declaring that the suspects would be charged to court.
On April 2017, he was charged again for possession of narcotic substance after he was arraigned before the Mpraeso Circuit Court, where he pleaded guilty and was convicted on his own plea, and sentenced to a 10 - year jail term with hard labour.
It was all I could do to obtain my freedom.I knew the Mayor and Court Clerk the Sheriff, and Most of the County Comissioners and State law makers and many Federal Reps from Around the Nation, and some Militray Officals from The US and other Nations, I had a small Photo Ablume, I was able to show, After being treated as a criminal and having my rights trampled on I was let go, the people who was in charge of the shelter where I was wisked off to in the Middle of the night, housed most substance abuse people, and those who are homeless, all of htis because of the great healing low cost product Kefir, I later returned in 2010 a Neighbor had Breat Cancer, She tired the kefir and had great results, my Son was relucent to try it, So I added it to salad as a dressing, he recently got his degree in Computer tech and is preparing to go for his BA this month, My cronological age is 70 evryone take me for 40 - 45, I have not seen a doctor for any health issue since the 80's except dental repair, and cleaning, The question of Constipation I have heard will result if the fermentation is longer then two or three days, But if issues do occure, a one day fermentation will correct it.Hope to get a following, for my unique expereinces and discovries, kefir is a healing product, The one I have comes from Kazastan.
This is important, the Court explained, because allowing individuals to choose where to use public money defuses the charge that the government is supporting religion.
(b) If the respondent named in a charge filed under section 706 fails or refuses to comply with a demand of the Commission for permission to examine or to copy evidence in conformity with the provisions of section 709 (a), or if any person required to comply with the provisions of section 709 (c) or (d) fails or refuses to do so, or if any person fails or refuses to comply with a demand by the Commission to give testimony under oath, the United States district court for the district in which such person is found, resides, or transacts business, shall, upon application of the Commission, have jurisdiction to issue to such person an order requiring him to comply with the provisions of section 709 (c) or (d) or to comply with the demand of the Commission, but the attendance of a witness may not be required outside the State where he is found, resides, or transacts business and the production of evidence may not be required outside the State where such evidence is kept.
According to a decades - old Supreme Court decision, catalog retailers and online retailers do not have to charge sales tax in states where they have no physical presence, but state governments realized that Amazon's distribution centers amounted to a physical presence.
you need to name the specific harm done and who the victims are, in a court of law you need a plantiff and defendant and counsel and specific charges in order to receive compesation, and the victims must be compensated by the wrong doers, so who are the victims here and who are the wrong doers nad where is the court decision that says so and so must pay someone or a group of someone?
Indeed, as Lord Upjohn remarked in Padfield v Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food [1968] AC 997, [1968] 1 All ER 694 where a «public officer» who was «charged by Parliament with the discharge of a public discretion affecting Her Majesty's subjects» chose not to give reasons for a decision, «it may be, if circumstances warrant it, that a court may be at liberty to come to the conclusion that he had no good reason for reaching that conclusion».
In relation to trade union funding of cases the inadequacy of the Scottish regime is highlighted in chapter 14 of the Scottish Courts Review at para 97 «it is understood that some trade unions have special arrangements that do not fit the normal model for speculative fee agreements, in that success fees are not charged where the claim is successful and neither the defenders nor the pursuer's legal costs are charged to the pursuer if he is unsuccessful, these being met either by the union itself or the solicitors».
The Supreme Court of Canada held that provincial courts have the power to declare legislation invalid in criminal cases and this included the power to dismiss charges where the legislation is invalid by reason of a violation of the Charter.
Beyond that, the reviewing court found it would be unfair to charge the parties with Windsor's 2013 interpretation for the 2010 fees clause where earlier decisions found that a defense was not the equivalent of an «action.»
If, however, you were convicted, and the Court found that you knew that the victim hadn't died at the time of trial, but you did not raise the fact that the victim wasn't dead, it isn't clear if you could have the original conviction vacated because it was a fair trial and you knew evidence sufficient to get yourself acquitted (which you may have refrained from presenting to avoid conviction on a lesser charge like kidnapping or aggravated assault), and the status of an «actual innocence» grounds for vacating a conviction after trial is hotly disputed, conservatives like the late Justice Scalia generally say «no», liberals generally say «yes», moderates like to say «yes» but make it almost impossible to establish except in rare cases like one where a live person walks in when there was a murder conviction for killing that actually living person.
They include jury trials, judge alone trials and cases where it was in the client's best interests to negotiate a resolution by way of a guilty plea to reduced charges or applications to the courts for a special disposition.
Expungement refers to the process where records of a prior criminal charge, arrest, and related court proceedings are erased and destroyed by the courts and other agencies in possession of such records.
Where this issue comes up is often in an impaired driving context and Alberta courts tend to reason that in light of the prevalence of drinking and driving charges, being pulled over at night, near a bar might in and of itself sufficiently satisfy s. 10 (a) rights.
26 The Report of the Attorney General's Advisory Committee on Charge Screening, Disclosure and Resolution Discussions (the Martin Committee Report)(1993), at p. 369 (in a passage approved in R. v. Rajaeefard (1996), 27 O.R. (3d) 323 (C.A.) at 330 - 1), observed: Consequently, in the interest of encouraging the parties to fully explore their case at a pre-hearing conference without prejudice to their right to subsequently litigate fully all unresolved issues in open court, it is the Committee's view that the parties should, where either one thinks it appropriate, be able to insist on a trial before a different judge.
Where a bankruptcy order is made between interim charging order and the final charging order hearing, the court has a discretion to make the final order.
(Order, p. 30, citing Hudson v. Louisiana, 450 U.S. 40, 44 (1981)-RRB- In Hudson the court also held that «a reversal due to failure of proof at trial, where the State received a fair opportunity to offer whatever proof it could assemble, bars retrial on the same charge
Keeping a person in custody while awaiting trial is only justified where it is necessary: • To make sure the person shows up to court to deal with the chargeTo make sure the person shows up to court to deal with the chargeto court to deal with the chargeto deal with the charges.
Many solicitors will offer a fixed fee for the divorce suit as this is usually a fairly straightforward process without any requirement for attendance at court but instructing a solicitor to deal with financial or children matters is still usually charged based on an hourly rate and this is where the costs can creep up.
Indeed, the status of this topic as free speech that is supposed to be guaranteed under the First Amendment has been upheld by courts more than once: ● in Florida, where a judge affirmed that handing out FIJA brochures regarding jury nullification is legal based on principles of free speech ● in New York, where a federal judge dismissed false jury tampering charges against someone handing out brochures that advocated jury nullification ● in Colorado, where a judge dismissed false jury tampering charges against two people handing out FIJA's educational material on jury nullification
In sum, where credit repair companies charge for ineffective services, our firm represents consumers in court where, instead of paying upfront fees, we will seek a permanent correction to credit report errors and compensation.
Tuckers Solicitors Military Law & Courts Martial Department specialises in providing legal advice and representation to members of the Army, Navy and the Air Force, where they have been charged with an offence under Service Law.
As such they are considered to be akin to «judicial restraining orders» and «peace bonds» are regularly resorted to by the Court, Crown and Defence as a mid-way ground or as part of plea negotiations where assaults, sexual assaults or domestic assaults are alleged and charged in the first instance.
In State courts of Escambia, Santa Rosa, Okaloosa and Walton counties we've been involved in well over a thousand cases and tried to jury verdict cases ranging from first degree capital murder where the death penalty is being sought, sexual battery, drug trafficking, violations of probation, domestic violence and racketeering to misdemeanor criminal charges including driving while under the influence and driving while license suspended.
The summons you would receive if you are caught with marijuana is not just a ticket, but it is your official notice of when and where you are supposed to appear in court for the charge.
I also find it surprising that this exception applies to contempt charges, where the court is thus simultaneously judge, jury, and accuser.
First - class b2c writers charge a lot less than lawyers do, and (with respect) generally write more accessible copy and, where there is a big case which has just broken to report, they'll get readable, correct and compelling copy out a lot faster than will lawyers (we use court reporters).
The problems I encountered were: (1) obfuscation ensured lawyers were the only conduit into the system (the process is now easy to understand with all of the new services and interactive flowcharts); (2) most of my legal fees where for services that did not require a law degree; (3) the most expensive errors were legal errors and there was no reasonable recourse for recovery; (4) the court administration was unable to handle the volume; (5) simple but essential administrative tasks, like filing documents, required either half a day or $ 100 + for every single filing; (6) Security and privacy are completely ignored, unlike every other profession; (7) there is no incentive, nor is there a governing body to ensure the matter is handled in an ethical, humane, timely manner; (8) lawyers have a monopoly and charge more than the market can bear for personal litigation.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z