Amazing, especially when you consider that this is the same Lindzen who
charges oil and coal interests $ 2,500 a day for his consulting services.
To say the accusation is widespread that Dr Lindzen «
charges oil and coal interests $ 2,500 a day for his consulting services» is something of an understatement, when you consider how many hits are found in an internet search for variants of it.
This poses a massive problem for Ross Gelbspan, who has become rather famous over the narrative that Lindzen «
charges oil and coal interests $ 2,500 a day for his consulting services.»
According to Gelbspan, «Lindzen, for his part,
charges oil and coal interests $ 2,500 a day for his consulting services; his 1991 trip to testify before a Senate committee was paid for by Western Fuels, and a speech he wrote, entitled «Global Warming: the Origin and Nature of Alleged Scientific Consensus,» was underwritten by OPEC.»
In his 1995 article, «The Heat Is On,» Ross Gelbspan reported Lindzen
charged oil and coal organizations $ 2,500 per day for his consulting services.
Not exact matches
Assume I've replaced my car with a new plug - in hybrid,
and to eliminate extraneous factors assume that they're otherwise identical — same weight, CdA, rolling resistance, & c. I've replaced an energy path of
oil well —
oil tanker or pipeline — refinery — tank truck — gas pump — IC engine with one that's 0.7 * (
coal mine — railroad — power station — transmission line — battery
charging — electric motor).
But 16 years after the white lab coat protests, Smith was reviving the «secret science»
charge just as the Obama administration was finalizing a plan to tighten the fine soot regulations, a move vehemently opposed by
coal - fired power generators
and oil refiners.
On the other hand, proponents of taking action to curb climate change
charge that efforts at reform are being opposed by the
coal,
oil,
and natural - gas industries
and from
oil - rich countries like Saudi Arabia.
According to Ayers,
charging fossil - fuel companies under RICO «would effectively change the subject to the campaign of deception practiced by the
coal, gas,
and oil companies.»
In the article, Gelbspan claimed that Lindzen
charged «
oil and coal interests $ 2,500 a day for his consulting services; [
and] his 1991 trip to testify before a Senate committee was paid for by Western Fuels
and a speech he wrote, entitled «Global Warming: the Origin
and Nature of Alleged Scientific Consensus,» was underwritten by OPEC.»
We mandate no more than 110g / km for personal road - registered motor vehicles (with offsets for biofuels) with serious progressively escalating per km
charges for vehicles not achieving this
and place a tax on locally used crude
oil and coal reflecting at least $ 40 per tonne of CO2.
The Carbon Tax Center doesn't take positions on competing technologies; we focus our advocacy on remedying the market failure that allows burning of gas,
oil and especially
coal without
charging for the resultant climate damage.
If these young people are leading the
charge, then Big
Coal,
Oil,
and Gas had better get out of the way.
The plan is simple:
charge oil, gas
and coal companies a small, annually increasing fee on fossil fuels sales — then collect the fees
and evenly distribute them amongst the American people.
Robert's commercial disputes experience has focused on the energy sector
and includes representing a multinational energy company in a $ 150 million ICC arbitration concerning the impact of government - imposed price renegotiation in the
coal industry; representing an
oil & gas major in a dispute under a long term gas supply agreement in relation to an off - shore West African field; defending a Russian energy infrastructure company in LCIA arbitration proceedings;
and advising an
oil major on potential claims under a bi-lateral investment treaty related to corruption
charges and maltreatment of company officers.