Second, given that
charter high schools tend to be much smaller than traditional public high schools, charter school effects might simply be attributable to their smaller size.
Not exact matches
Schools not offering the subsidized lunch program also tended to overlap with schools having a higher concentration of white students, highly suggestive of the existence of a set of charter schools serving disproportionate numbers of non-poor, white st
Schools not offering the subsidized lunch program also
tended to overlap with
schools having a higher concentration of white students, highly suggestive of the existence of a set of charter schools serving disproportionate numbers of non-poor, white st
schools having a
higher concentration of white students, highly suggestive of the existence of a set of
charter schools serving disproportionate numbers of non-poor, white st
schools serving disproportionate numbers of non-poor, white students.
States with
higher - than - expected SAT scores were less likely to pass
charter school legislation;
tended to adopt such legislation later, if at all; and passed weaker laws.
In contrast to
charters in suburban areas, which
tend toward a progressive pedagogy, central - city
charters typically embrace the «no - excuses» model of teaching and learning, emphasizing strict dress codes, rigorous discipline, extended
school days and
school years, and
high expectations for performance on standardized tests.
Broad analyses of
charter performance have
tended to show that they slightly outperform traditional public
schools, especially at the middle and
high school level, although critics say that could be because their students
tend to come from more academically motivated families.
Charter schools attract proportionally more
higher - performing, advantaged students and
tend to «weed out» the lowest performers.
Their report found that, on average,
charter school students in New York City
tend to stay at their
schools at a
higher rate than do students at nearby traditional district
schools.
PARCC scores
tend to be lower for
high schools with larger at - risk populations, though some
schools defy expectations, especially
charters.
They point out that
charters tend to have a
higher percentage of poor and minority children than most American
schools, and in a sense they are right.
States like Arizona where a
high percentage of public
schools are
charter schools tend to attract the
charter management organizations because they are very supportive of those
schools coming in and setting up shop.»
ELL students and students with disabilities
tend to score lower on standardized tests, therefore
charter schools look
higher performing when they do not have either subgroup.
There
tends to be, however, greater variability in
charter school achievement, with the
charter sector having a greater share of both low - performing and
high - achieving
schools.
Charter schools attract a
higher percentage of black students than traditional public
schools, in part because they
tend to be located in urban areas.
Charters tend to have
high levels of donations and grants, while
schools with more wealthy students have the ability to run fundraisers that provide extra money for the
school.
Charter schools tend to serve
higher percentages of low - income students.
That said, the
highest - quality research studies find that
charter schools tend to produce greater gains in math and reading test scores for traditionally disadvantaged students, compared to the gains these same students would achieve if they attended a traditional public
school.
Charter schools also
tend to demonstrate greater learning gains for students in early grades than for students in
high school.
The success of
high - quality
charter schools serving mostly - minority children in those urban communities (where the
schools tend to also be segregated thanks to pernicious zip code education policies) also proves lie to the idea of integration as
school reform.
Charter schools do not bring on equality; in fact they EXACERBATE INEQUALITY, as they
tend to skim off the
higher - performing students, leaving the regular public
schools with a greater concentration of troubled children.
We know, for example, that
charter teachers
tend to exit
schools at
higher rates than other public teachers, which, all else being equal, could be detrimental to student outcomes.
This makes sense in terms of the text of Massachusetts»
charter cap law itself, which, as discussed in the Definition section, places an emphasis on lower - performing
school districts (
tending towards cities, not suburbs) and
higher population districts, with Commonwealth
charter schools prohibited in communities with fewer than 30,000 residents.
Moreover,
higher performing students
tend to transition from district run
schools to
charters and lower performing students transition from
charters to district run
schools.
McIntosh's charges come amid growing claims from
school choice critics that
charters — publicly - funded
schools with broad flexibility in their curriculum and staffing — may «cherrypick» or intentionally exclude some
high - needs students, serving decidedly fewer low - income children and children with disabilities, populations that also
tend to trail their peers academically.