Sentences with phrase «charter laws appeared»

Not exact matches

Antonacci asked the law department to address two main issues: The county charter appears to say that raises for county legislators should be voted on when the budget for that year is approved; and state Municipal Home Rule Law indicates that salary changes made during the term of an elected official, such as the county executive, should take the form of a local law, not a resolution as passed by the Legislatulaw department to address two main issues: The county charter appears to say that raises for county legislators should be voted on when the budget for that year is approved; and state Municipal Home Rule Law indicates that salary changes made during the term of an elected official, such as the county executive, should take the form of a local law, not a resolution as passed by the LegislatuLaw indicates that salary changes made during the term of an elected official, such as the county executive, should take the form of a local law, not a resolution as passed by the Legislatulaw, not a resolution as passed by the Legislature.
But because SUNY's regulations must still comply with the state's charter law, the provision did not appear to have major implications.
But after Mr. Cuomo last year pushed through a law giving charter schools more power to obtain free space in city school buildings, Mr. de Blasio's administration appears wary of doing anything that could jeopardize its biggest priorities in Albany, which include getting mayoral control of schools renewed and securing more aid for prekindergarten, after - school programs and city schools in general.
Since the County Executive clearly has no intention of signing the Charter Revision law in time for it to appear on the November 2016 ballot, I will be clocking in legislation ensuring active military members maintain their rate of pay while deployed.
Curiously, Smith appears to object to our policy recommendation «that state laws provide an automatic union vote in the first year of each charter
Washington Policy Center, the state's premier public policy research and education organization, has completed non-partisan, objective analysis of all statewide propositions appearing on this year's ballot, including Referendum 55, which asks voters to decide if a limited experimental charter school law, which the Legislature passed earlier this year, should be passed...
But after Mr. Cuomo last year pushed through a law giving charter schools more power to obtain free space in city school buildings, Mr. de Blasio's administration appears wary of doing anything that could jeopardize its biggest priorities in Albany, which include getting mayoral control of schools renewed and securing more aid for prekindergarten, after - school programs and city schools in general.
Tillman's anecdote, however, doesn't appear to hold up when analyzed in light of current law which already permits a sizable proportion of a public charter school's teaching workforce to be unlicensed.
New efforts to change Maryland's charter school law, buoyed by a recent report from the Abell Foundation, appear to be a solution in search of a problem.
One explanation for the proposal's failures is that it appears to have been developed in conjunction with The Connecticut School Finance Project, a charter school advocacy front group that has been working closely — in violation of Connecticut's ethics laws — with Governor Dannel Malloy and his administration.
The number of corporate funded education reform and charter school front groups in Connecticut is popping up faster than the buds appear during a warm spring week and these groups seem virtually incapable of adhering to Connecticut's ethics and lobbying laws.
An even more important, but unresolved issue, is how Perry can even replicate Capital Prep Magnet School in Bridgeport and Harlem when federal copyright laws and Hartford Board of Education policies appear to make it clear that the concepts, materials, curriculum, policies and procedures that Perry has said he will be using in his charter schools actually belong to the Hartford Board of Education and the taxpayers of Hartford and do not belong to Perry or Perry's private company as he claimed in his Bridgeport and Harlem charter school proposals.
Moreover, the clear severance of ESM from Article 136 (3) TFEU, and thus any roots in EU law, appears specious in light of the remainder of the judgment, which upholds the role of the EU institutions (including the Court) in the ESM and points to the importance of (Commission administered) conditionality on the one hand, while on the other, the application of the Charter of Fundamental Rights is excluded because the ESM is not within the scope of EU law.
Despite this laudable goal, the law raises several red flags under the Charter: it appears overbroad both in its sphere of application (it applies not only to bars, but all licenced premises) and targets for removal (including not only gang members, but persons who support or facilitate gangs, or persons in the company of any of those persons).
Nonetheless part of that review does involve identifying an objective public interest «recognised by Union law», identifying such an interest would not only appear to be an essential part of the test outlined in the Charter but would have been welcome in articulating the approach adopted by Union law towards the interaction of criminal activity and the exercise of the rights of Union citizenship, including the newly found political rights.
Since in any event horizontal effect of the fundamental freedoms and of the principle of non-discrimination on the basis of sex are well - recognised phenomena in EU law, it would appear paradoxical if the introduction of the Charter would deteriorate the situation of fundamental rights protection in primary law (paras 34 - 35).
It appears to represent a wholesale importation of Charter analysis into private contract law.
So maybe to acknowledge the reality of their status above the rule of law, the reference to God in the opening line of the Charter should be replaced with the words, «law societies,» which would therefore appear before the phrase, «rule of law,» and immediately after the words, «supremacy of.»
Jessica Wells is currently appearing in the Supreme Court in an appeal concerning the interaction of the principles of international law on state immunity, Articles 6 and 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights and Article 47 of the EU Charter on Fundamental Rights and Freedoms, in the context of employment claims against embassies.
What in Carter appears as a question of Charter rights will give way to a far more vexing puzzle of administrative law.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z