INCS work to support an effective
charter public school sector in Illinois is made possible by the investment of many partners and champions.
Atlanta, GA, March 20, 2014 — Georgia's growing
charter public school sector has a critical need for individuals with the skills required to...
Common sense solutions to preserving and growing a thriving and accountable nonprofit
charter public schools sector by solving issues related to modernizing California's authorizing system, and expanding facilities options for charters.
Not exact matches
School choice: Sen. Michael Bennet, a Colorado Democrat who is the former superintendent of Denver Public Schools and a supporter of the charter school sector, pointed out that many charter schools are underperfo
School choice: Sen. Michael Bennet, a Colorado Democrat who is the former superintendent of Denver
Public Schools and a supporter of the charter school sector, pointed out that many charter schools are underperf
Schools and a supporter of the
charter school sector, pointed out that many charter schools are underperfo
school sector, pointed out that many
charter schools are underperf
schools are underperforming.
In any event, the city's premier
charter school network, Eva Moskowitz's Success Academies, is having none of it: «While it is true that New York's
charter sector made some gains in this year's budget, backroom manipulation... ensures
public charter school children will be dangerously shortchanged for years to come,» Success asserted in a press release.
And
public -
sector labor groups, including the teachers unions and CSEA, have either declared a truce or largely step aside from directly knocking Cuomo has issues like less generous contracts and fights over
charter schools have died away.
UPDATE: Johnson released a lengthy statement in response to the AFL - CIO attack, noting he has been a «strong supporter» of a property tax cap and
charter schools, was «proud» to support Tier V — «a move that will save Long Island taxpayers $ 8.5 billion and save this state $ 35 billion over the next three decades» — and has been urging teacher and
public sector unions to sit down with elected officials to «hammer out revised wage agreements that reflect the current economic reality.»
Cuomo spent his first term attacking
public sector unions, undermining funding for
public hospitals and pursuing an education deform agenda that funded
charter schools, pushed high - stakes testing and undermined
public schools.
Still, de Blasio is often at odds with the
sector and its backers over granting
charter schools space in
public buildings.
Members of the UFT and its state affiliate, NYSUT, sent nearly 2,000 faxes and made nearly 1,000 phone calls to get their message to the Senate Republicans, who were pushing to expand and enrich the
charter sector at the expense of neighborhood
public schools.
CREDO had done a national study that found more
charters doing badly compared to their feeder
schools from the traditional
public sector, and an NBER study in New York City found substantially better performance of
charters versus traditional
public schools.
The
public charter school board reviews and certifies graduates in the city's
charter sector; DCPS should do the same.
As the number of students entering
charters has grown steadily year by year, comprising in 2012 approximately 4.2 percent of
public school students nationwide, the case for rethinking the capital requirements of the
charter sector has become overwhelming.
On - going trends involving
public school segregation have been a primary focus of the CRP's research, and the expanding policy emphasis on
school choice prompted analysis of the much smaller — but politically potent —
charter sector.
Fifty - two percent of city
charter school students were in 90 - 100 % minority
schools, compared to only 34 % of traditional
public school students — a difference of eighteen percentage points, very similar to the overall difference of twenty percentage points between the two
sectors of
schools (Table 22 on p. 63 of our report).
While the national, state, and metro area analysis comprised the bulk of our report, we did, in fact, examine the segregation of students in
charter and traditional
public schools by geography — comparing students in these
school sectors within cities, suburbs, and rural areas.
Macke Raymond, director of Stanford University's Center for Research on Education Outcomes (CREDO), and an expert on monopolies in the
public and private sectors, made this clear at a 2006 forum organized by the National Alliance for Public Charter Sc
public and private
sectors, made this clear at a 2006 forum organized by the National Alliance for
Public Charter Sc
Public Charter Schools.
Our analysis presents a more accurate, but still imperfect, picture of the levels of racial segregation in the
charter sector relative to the traditional
public -
school sector.
But while we're seeing truly great progress in supporting the quality growth of the
public charter school sector, there's still a lot of work to be done here in Newark.
First, the majority of students in central cities, in both the
public charter sector and in the traditional
public sector, attend intensely segregated minority
schools.
What makes Boston's resistance to expanding
charter schools so remarkable is that the city's
charter sector includes some of the best urban
public schools in the country, of any kind.
As the recent comparative studies have shown, these results pale in comparison to Boston's high - performing
charter sector but are stronger than those in most other urban
public school systems.
A key step in establishing a
charter -
school sector is identifying the institutions that can authorize would - be founders to create these new
public schools and grant them
charters.
The result is entrenched competition between entire
school sectors, such as
charter versus district,
public versus private.
In fact, in the vast majority of the 39 metro areas reviewed in the CRP report, the application of our central - city comparison decreases (relative to the flawed CRP analysis) the level of segregation in the
charter sector as compared to the traditional
public school sector.
Thus, while it appears that
charter students are, on average, more likely to attend hypersegregated minority
schools, the difference between the
charter and traditional
public sector is far less stark than the CRP authors suggest.
Harris instead offers two potential alternatives: 1) the improved
public /
charter school performance in New Orleans made the performance of the private
sector look relatively worse; and 2) the curriculum at most private
schools may not have been aligned to the state test, so the poor performance merely reflects that lack of alignment rather than poor performance.
Demand for seats in
charter schools remains high among families but
public enthusiasm for continued growth of the
charter sector seems to be slipping.
A third faction, let's call them the Prudent Expansionists, have thought it just dandy that NCLB would invite bad
schools to close and reopen as good ones, but doubt that the
charter sector has the capacity to restructure vast swaths of failing
public schools.
Placing
public charter schools on a par with TPS in receiving local educational funds, as Colorado plans to do, would bring over half the cities in our study to funding parity across the two
public school sectors.
In the traditional
public school sector in both Florida and Chicago, high
schools are almost always separate from middle
schools, which is not the case for
charter schools.
The
public sector pays teachers who hold master's degrees about 25 percent more; in
charter schools, they are paid about 20 percent more.
Even within the
public sector, there are
schools to which students are assigned based on geography and
schools they choose to attend (magnet and
charter schools, for example).
Both Detroit's
charter and traditional
public -
school sectors serve predominantly African American families (roughly 85 percent) with limited economic resources (in
charters, 84.5 percent qualify for free or reduced - price lunch versus 81.6 percent in district
schools).
Thirty - seven percent of the students for whom we observe test - score gains at least once in both
sectors attended a traditional
public school after they were in a
charter school, while the same is true of only 30 percent of all students in
charter schools.
In a decade and a half, the
charter school movement has gone from a glimmer in the eyes of a few Minnesota reformers to a maturing
sector of America's
public education system.
We did, in fact, examine the segregation of students in
charter and traditional
public schools by geography — comparing students in these
school sectors within cities, suburbs, and rural areas.
Others seem to want the
charter sector to permanently operate in parallel to a district
sector, giving interested low - income families
public alternatives to assigned government - run
schools.
Indeed, D.C.'s
charter school sector, overseen by the independent D.C. Public Charter School Board, comes across as the purest form of this new
charter school sector, overseen by the independent D.C. Public Charter School Board, comes across as the purest form of this new s
school sector, overseen by the independent D.C.
Public Charter School Board, comes across as the purest form of this new
Charter School Board, comes across as the purest form of this new s
School Board, comes across as the purest form of this new system.
So here, in this collection, I have drawn from various sources and experiences over time and around the world, ideas from inspectors and their reports, leadership training course tutors and candidates,
school improvement ambassadors, union officials, faculty leaders, headteachers and principals in all their guises, governors, government officials, civil servants, councillors, parents, students, current, aspiring, ex and retired teachers, in the
public, private, Academy,
Charter, free, not - for - profit, voluntary and charitable
sectors.
Others may want to focus on expanding their
charter or private
school sectors, or on fostering more choice within the traditional
public sector.
It seems clear, then, that if the
charter sector hopes to contribute to transformational numbers in high - quality
public schools, the current CMO approach alone can't get it there.
After all, a common test does make life easier for parents «shopping» for
schools across the
public, private, and
charter sectors and for taxpayers seeking evidence of return on investment from their education dollars.
Chartering empowers thousands of African American families to create a vibrant new
public -
school sector in Harlem; it liberates a group of Minnesota teachers to start and run their own
schools; and it provides a Teach for America alum the freedom to start a network of college - prep
charters serving Mexican immigrants in Texas.
Ritter finds that «when examined more appropriately, the data actually reveal small differences in the level of overall segregation between the
charter school sector and the traditional
public -
school sector.»
Mayor Muriel Bowser presides over this dual system, where the traditional D.C.
Public Schools are run by a chancellor and the parallel sector of independently operated charter schools is answerable to D.C.'s Public Charter School
Schools are run by a chancellor and the parallel
sector of independently operated
charter schools is answerable to D.C.'s Public Charter School
charter schools is answerable to D.C.'s Public Charter School
schools is answerable to D.C.'s
Public Charter School
Charter School Board.
But a decade ago several trends in American education, and in the Catholic Church, made a Catholic - operated
public school seem increasingly possible: 1) the traditional, parish - based Catholic
school system, especially in the inner cities, was crumbling; 2) equally troubled urban
public -
school systems were failing to educate most of their students; and 3) a burgeoning
charter school movement, born in the early 1990s, was beginning to turn heads among educators in both the private and
public sectors.
Our finding that
charter school sectors in all 28 states that we study demonstrate higher productivity and / or return on investment than their traditional public school sectors has ruffled some feathers at the National School Boards Associ
school sectors in all 28 states that we study demonstrate higher productivity and / or return on investment than their traditional
public school sectors has ruffled some feathers at the National School Boards Associ
school sectors has ruffled some feathers at the National
School Boards Associ
School Boards Association.
A majority of the states in our sample have
charter sectors that enroll a higher percentage of low - income students than their traditional
public schools peers.
For lots of reasons; D.C. has great
school operators that are expanding; the
charter law is quite good; the city has valuable support organizations; and
public support has helped insulate the
sector from unfounded attacks.