* In most states,
charter school districts reported spending less money per pupil than traditional public schools on instruction, student support services and teacher salaries.
Not exact matches
The U.F.T.
report found that in Manhattan's
District 5, for example, English language learners make up 6 percent of the charter school enrollment compared to the district average of 14
District 5, for example, English language learners make up 6 percent of the
charter school enrollment compared to the
district average of 14
district average of 14 percent.
The U.F.T. held three «emergency» meetings with its members and parents on Thursday, ran a full - page anti-Cuomo advertisement in the Daily News, and released an extensive
report claiming, among other things, that
charter schools don't enroll enough high - needs students compared to their
district school counterparts.
At the same time, students with disabilities comprise 17 percent of the
charter school enrollment compared to the 27 percent
district average, the
report found.
After months of aggressive advocacy explicitly aimed at protecting and growing the state's
charter sector, the group sent out a
report detailing test scores at some of New York City's worst
district schools.
The New York Post
reports that the city Department of Education is trying to fast - track plans for the placement of a Moskowitz
charter school in an unnamed
district school in Manhattan's Hell's Kitchen.
A few
reports of obstructionist behavior by
districts stand out and have been chronicled in these pages by Joe Williams («Games
Charter Opponents Play,» features, Winter 2007) and Nelson Smith («Whose
School Buildings Are They, Anyway?»
These numbers are similar to those for actual percentages of students with IEPs enrolled in
charter and
district schools reported in Figure 1a.
As an example of a
district imitating successful
charter -
school practices, Denver Public
Schools is, as Education Week has reported, «aiming to re-create within its own buildings the innovation seen in top charter schools, and keep the state funding.
Schools is, as Education Week has
reported, «aiming to re-create within its own buildings the innovation seen in top
charter schools, and keep the state funding.
schools, and keep the state funding.»
The National Alliance for Public
Charter Schools reports that, nationwide, 55.6 percent of charter schools operate in urban areas, as compared to only 24.5 percent of district s
Charter Schools reports that, nationwide, 55.6 percent of charter schools operate in urban areas, as compared to only 24.5 percent of district s
Schools reports that, nationwide, 55.6 percent of
charter schools operate in urban areas, as compared to only 24.5 percent of district s
charter schools operate in urban areas, as compared to only 24.5 percent of district s
schools operate in urban areas, as compared to only 24.5 percent of
district schoolsschools.
However, he
reports, «
charter schools have become successful participants in the same bond markets that finance
district facilities.»
However, pilot
schools, which were started by Boston Public Schools and the Boston Teachers Union, remain part of the local school district and are continuing to grow — seven new schools are slated to open this September; charter schools have independent advisory boards, are mostly nonunion, and report directly to the
schools, which were started by Boston Public
Schools and the Boston Teachers Union, remain part of the local school district and are continuing to grow — seven new schools are slated to open this September; charter schools have independent advisory boards, are mostly nonunion, and report directly to the
Schools and the Boston Teachers Union, remain part of the local
school district and are continuing to grow — seven new
schools are slated to open this September; charter schools have independent advisory boards, are mostly nonunion, and report directly to the
schools are slated to open this September;
charter schools have independent advisory boards, are mostly nonunion, and report directly to the
schools have independent advisory boards, are mostly nonunion, and
report directly to the state.
But that option is only helpful when
districts identify «surplus» space, and
charter operators
report that many have been unwilling to share their facilities or consolidate under - enrolled
schools in order to do so.
A new Fordham
report finds that 28 % of teachers in traditional
district schools miss more than 10
school days a year for sick or personal leave while teachers in
charter schools have lower rates absences.
The CREDO
report found that students in Boston
charter schools gain the equivalent of 259 additional days of instruction in math and 245 days in reading compared to their counterparts in traditional
district schools.
Under the auspices of the
district -
charter compact, New Orleans has an integrated student - enrollment system, a common
report card for all
schools, and a transparent process for allocating facilities to
school operators.
A couple of weeks after the
report was released, Massachusetts Governor Deval Patrick, who has resisted expanding
charter schools in favor of proposed «readiness
schools,» reversed course and proposed raising the cap on how much a
school district could spend on
charter schools, from 9 to 12 percent.
Did you know that 46 % of all California
school districts and direct - funded
charter schools report that their student are involved in full or part time online or blending learning?
According to a
report by the Michael & Susan Dell Foundation, the
school district, which funded the campus, has more control over student enrollment than the
charter management organization does.
LA
school officials are fighting a court order which requires the
school district to offer more space to
charter schools,
reports Howard Blume in today's LA Times.
Charter -
school parents
report fewer social problems than do
district -
school parents.
In my own address to the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education this year, I
reported that K - 12 online education options continue to expand, with students participating in site - based online labs, hybrid courses, and part - and full - time virtual options that are offered by a variety of providers including
charter schools,
districts, state supplemental programs, corporations, and colleges.
Despite making far larger test - score gains than students attending open - enrollment
district schools, and despite the emphasis their
schools place on cultivating non-cognitive skills,
charter school students exhibit markedly lower average levels of self - control as measured by student self -
reports (see Figure 2).
However, there is greater variation among
charter parents in how frequently they
report communicating about teacher quality than among parents in either private or
district schools.
With the frequent
reports of
school districts doing a poor job of fulfilling their authorizing duties and
school districts» authorizing over half of the nation's
charter schools, it is easy to see how the real power of the
chartering strategy is being negated.
In a 2015
report, Stanford University's Center for Research on Education Outcomes (CREDO) found that the average
charter -
school student in the Bay Area attained significantly more growth in reading and math than similar students in nearby
district schools — and that this difference increased the longer he or she stayed in a
charter school.
We find that parents
report less social disruption at
charter schools than at
district schools.
In 2009, CREDO
reported that
charter students performed somewhat worse in reading and substantially worse in math than their
district school counterparts.
The
report, «Boosting Performance and Containing Cost through Mayoral Academies,» contrasts the low performance of low - income and minority students and the wide achievement gaps in traditional
district schools, and the high performance of low - income and minority students and smaller achievement gaps in high - performing
charter schools in neighboring states.
But I would've preferred the
report to point out that
school quality matters far more than
school operator, and while the CSO - model is a promising approach to the
district sector, it should be viewed in the context of a city's entire portfolio of
schools — CSO,
charter, and private.
Also interesting is that 66 percent of
district schools report using blended learning, whereas only 42 percent of
charters do — something that confirms my observations but is counter to the narrative many in the education reform space hold.
According to the Global
Report Card, more than a third of the 30
school districts with the highest math achievement in the United States are actually
charter schools.
A 2010 Ball State University
report titled «
Charter School Funding: Inequity Persists» calculated that Arizona
district schools received about $ 9,600 per student in 2006 — 07 compared to $ 7,600 per student in
charters.
It bears noting that these
charter results are significantly better than the national average CREDO
reported in 2009, in which just 17 percent of
charter schools in the 16 states they studied performed better than their
district counterparts.
Adequate, fair funding: University of Arkansas analysts
report that the typical
charter gets 28 percent less funding per pupil than nearby
district schools, in large part because few
charters share in the locally generated portion of K — 12 funding.
As
reported elsewhere, the survey asked about
school spending,
charters, vouchers, teacher unions, bilingual education, digital learning, state take - overs of troubled
district schools, teacher unions, merit pay, teacher tenure, and many other matters.
For example, the Civil Rights Project
reports that, in the metropolitan area surrounding the
District of Columbia, 91.2 percent of
charter students are in segregated
schools, compared with just 20.9 percent of students in traditional public
schools.
That study, and a follow - up
report published two years later, found that in Detroit, about half to three - fifths of
charter schools outperformed demographically similar
district schools on reading and math assessments.
Three separate
reports using three separate methodologies all reached the same conclusion: Detroit's
charter schools outperform the city's
district schools.
The AFT's strategy of selective
reporting also colors its approach to the question of whether competition from
charter schools has forced changes in
district schools.
I find more credible the statistics from the U.S. Department of Education - sponsored
report The State of
Charter Schools 2000 showing that charter schools have a median student - teacher ratio of 16 to 1, 7 percent lower than that of district s
Charter Schools 2000 showing that charter schools have a median student - teacher ratio of 16 to 1, 7 percent lower than that of district s
Schools 2000 showing that
charter schools have a median student - teacher ratio of 16 to 1, 7 percent lower than that of district s
charter schools have a median student - teacher ratio of 16 to 1, 7 percent lower than that of district s
schools have a median student - teacher ratio of 16 to 1, 7 percent lower than that of
district schoolsschools.
Finally, in an extremely muddled discussion, the AFT
reports that
charter school student - to - teacher ratios «generally match or exceed» those of their host
districts.
The
report ignores the judgments of parents and students, uses bizarre definitions of such terms as innovation and accountability, compares
charter schools with the ideal
school rather than with traditional
district schools, and presents confusing and out - of - context discussions of such admittedly complex matters as
school finance and student achievement.
After A Nation At Risk and myriad other studies and
reports called for sweeping K — 12 reforms, he tried again with a 1988 treatise called Education by
Charter: Restructuring
School Districts.
The AFT correctly
reports that most kids in
charter schools seem to do about as well as in
district schools, controlling for demographic factors.
In Massachusetts in 2004, where
district hostility to
charter schools got so bad that state education officials had to warn superintendents to moderate their anti-
charter politicking, one
district student
reported being pressured to sign a petition opposing
charter schools.
Drawn from case studies of 17 such
schools in 10 California
districts, the 64 - page
report from the University of California, Los Angeles, also is based on hundreds of interviews with educators,
charter school founders, and parents, among others.
With
charter schools becoming more popular, federal officials must decide how to treat them under federal programs that were designed for traditional
school districts, the General Accounting Office recommends in a new
report.
As the Fordham
report points out, an April 2007 exposé from the Rocky Mountain News revealed, «one - quarter of DPS students were attending non-DPS
schools, including private
schools and
charter schools in surrounding
districts.
The differences in
reported levels of satisfaction between
charter and assigned -
district schools are wider among Asian and white families, too: for assigned -
district schools, the difference is 16 percentage points for Asian families and 9 for white families, compared to a statistically insignificant 6 percentage points and 5 percentage points for African American and Hispanic parents, respectively.