Sentences with phrase «charters do»

Private charters don't get much more exclusive than this in Hilo where we are the only US Coast Guard licensed commercial passenger vessel.

Most of the charters do not have dive gear on - board nor compressors to refill tanks.

Blue Hole tours that are private charters do not have any advance reservation requirements but are subject to aircraft availability and final confirmation.

Not in that it affects actual flying there any more than the weather affects flying anywhere, it is simply that charters do not fly into Cancun during the off seasons.

Terms and Conditions AWOL Luxury Charters do not take children under 8 years of age.

Additional snorkeling locations — Many charters don't only travel to Molokini.

However, charters do not receive state funding for buildings and infrastructure (Disclosure: Policy Watch is a project of the Justice Center).

Charters are exempted from some state restrictions on curriculum and teacher licensing, although the often privately - run schools frequently complain of funding inequalities, pointing out that charters don't receive state dollars for school facilities.

For - profit charters do not disclose compensation and for - profit related organizations do not disclose compensation.

Charters do not receive facilities funding from the state for their K - 12 programs, so this exclusion would only compound the myriad of facilities challenges faced by our schools.

In the recent Smater Balanced statewide tests, magnets outperformed the district's independent charter schools in nearly every major category, although the demographics of magnets vs. independent charters do not match up evenly, and some magnet schools are for highly - gifted students, which requires them to meet certain academic criteria for enrollment.

Charters do their best to educate all students who walk through their doors, and this report shows we are having some success.

Additionally, charters do not receive money for their school buildings — and they're the only public schools in the state treated this way.

In fact, according to the state, over 80 percent of public charter schools continue to outperform their local school districts in English Language Arts and over 60 percent of charters do the same in in math.

They might miss some students but all studies show charters do too.

Charter schools are demanding access to more pots of funding, including sales tax coffers and federal grants used to offset the costs of school food programs, despite the fact that many charters do not offer school food programs.

Last fall, the Washington Supreme Court ruled that charter schools are unconstitutional because charters do not have elected boards and therefore aren't «common» schools under the state's constitution, which means they are not entitled to dollars from the state's general fund.

The rationale for the expansion effort is based on the report's assertions that charters do a better job of educating children than traditional public schools.

There are several rebuttals to these assertions, the first and most obvious being that any sentence that claims that all charters do X is inherently false.

Some charters have wealthy boards of directors, some charters do not.

In most states, charters do not receive capital funds to support facility expenses.

In an exchange with charter critic Diane Ravitch, Rauner said that his charters don't need to apologize for not accepting second language learners and children with disabilities, because they only want families who are highly motivated.

Charters don't take care of their teachers 3.

In addition, thousands of charters do not provide subsidized lunches, putting them even further out of reach for the poorest families and children.

There are no special parental involvement rules that traditional schools must abide by that charters do not.

Calculate the number of students who are waiting for in - demand Boston district schools the same way that charters do and you end up with a number in excess of 20,000.

Federal appropriations for programs that charters don't provide, indirect cost reimbursements for school lunches that charters don't offer, and grant awards specifically targeted toward traditional public schools that support innovative methods to boost student achievement could all be up for grabs by charter schools.

But in Los Angeles, yes, charters do outperform traditional schools, but it is primarily because of one very large, very successful CMO that seems to really know what it is doing when it comes to college acceptance.

He found that the studies show that while there are some examples of success, particularly in large urban school districts that primarily serve students of color like those in New York City and Boston, they also show that across the nation, there is little evidence that charters do better than traditional public schools when it comes to student test scores.

In math, only 29 percent of charters do better.

Furthermore, when we examine the data we see that on the whole, charters do not perform better than high quality neighborhood public schools.

When charters do struggle, it is usually related to lack of financial support.

That's just a taste of how Pearson polices the charter sector: His «mystery shopper» campaign, in which investigators pose as prospective parents, helps ensure that charters don't exclude certain children.

«Oftentimes, the data are not sufficient, and in some states, charters don't share information.

The overall record shows charters do not outperform traditional public schools serving similar students.

«Did you know that public schools have mandated curriculum, and charters don't?»

Conversely, traditional schools have many of the same freedoms that charters do if they choose to exercise them.

Meanwhile, a new report from Stanford University's Center for Research of Education Outcomes (CREDO) found that online charters do a very poor job of educating children.

Public charters do not operate like selective public schools, i.e.: magnet schools, and do not require aptitude or other screening exams for entrance.

She asked, «How do we enforce something if charters don't come to the table?»

Unlike many public schools, most charters don't have the resources of a central district office — like recruitment teams or existing pools of resumes — to find new leaders quickly.

Yes, but research is clear that charters don't provide a better education.

Opponents of the schools argue that charters don't truly offer a choice and instead pick high - performing students to enroll because they are more likely to succeed.

New Jersey's ongoing debate about whether traditional public schools or charters do a better job educating students got some provocative new data yesterday, courtesy of a study from Stanford University that came down on the side of the charters — particularly in Newark's embattled school district.

United Teachers of Los Angeles president Alex Caputo - Pearl recently stated that «a lot of charters don't allow access for special - education students or English learners.»

It's worth noting, too, that charters don't necessarily achieve better results than their district counterparts.

As part of the new language, charters do not have to agree to enter into one - year co-locations under Prop. 39, which governs how charter schools share district space.

And charters don't serve children who need the most help.

Maybe Dannel doesn't know that Achievement First and the other charters do not have a very good track record with English Language Learners.

Some charters do not offer free or reduced - price lunch.