Not exact matches
Solar power still amounts to less than 1 % of the nation's electrical - generating capacity — coal
produces about 40 % — and its proportion will stay in the low single digits until it becomes
cheaper than fossil
fuels.
Rive argues that when the factory is up and running it will be able to
produce high - output PV cells at about 55 cents a watt — about a 20 % reduction from current prices, which will help Rive get closer to his goal of making solar
cheaper than fossil
fuels.
On the blackboard, fusing hydrogen atoms
produces enormous amounts of heat which can be captured and developed into an energy source, energy that is safe,
cheap, does not burn fossil
fuels or consume non-renewable resources.
While it is becoming
cheaper and
cheaper to
produce and use solar energy, the cost of transitioning from fossil
fuels is still very real.
«Coal was a
cheap fuel for
producing steam when we began treating our wastewater in the 1990s, so the need to supplement coal with biogas wasn't there.
UNSW Sydney chemists have invented a new,
cheap catalyst for splitting water with an electrical current to efficiently
produce clean hydrogen
fuel.
Some of the new nuclear science research programs, including the one at MIT, are studying new reactor designs and
fuel cycles that scientists (and policy - makers) hope will make nuclear plants safer and
cheaper to operate, and
produce waste materials with smaller volume, shorter half - lives, and less appeal to terrorists and other would - be nuclear powers.
The difference between engineering microbes to
produce drugs versus
fuel is that, ounce for ounce, drugs are much more valuable: a
fuel end product has to be
cheap enough to burn.
Launched in July 2010, JCAP aims to develop an efficient,
cheap, and durable system for
producing fuels using only sunlight, water, and carbon dioxide as inputs.
Natural gas from oil wells is one of the
cheapest and cleanest fossil
fuels today, used widely to heat homes as well as in manufacturing and to
produce electricity.
If MOXIE can
produce oxygen on Mars, that oxygen could then be used as
fuel to get a spacecraft back to Earth — a much, much
cheaper and safer option than trying to land a spacecraft that's still loaded with enough
fuel for the return journey.
BAU will achieve this goal as alternative energy sources are made more reliable, more robust (i.e. PV panels that maintain 80 % for 80 years or so), and
cheaper to mass
produce; and as fossil
fuels become harder to extract and more expensive.
Fossil
fuel is a
cheap method to
produce energy, and it will be used unless another technology is able to
produce energy
cheaper.
Their critics say their stance, however well intentioned, will
produce the real delays, given how much can be done now simply by cutting energy waste with tools already on the shelf — ranging from strengthening efficiency standards to eliminating billions of dollars in persistent fossil -
fuel subsidies that continue to make coal and oil much
cheaper than they really are when all their hidden costs are revealed.
«With our innovative toilet system, we can use simpler and
cheaper methods of harvesting the useful chemicals and even
produce fuel and energy from waste.
In more than 30 countries, electricity
produced through solar and wind energy is the same price or
cheaper than any new fossil
fuel capacity, the report, released last Wednesday, noted.
Cheap electricity provides water and
produces liquid
fuels for energy carriers for transport
fuels.
What happened in the fifties and sixties is that instead of pursuing a
cheap safe nuclear option we chose to pursue dirty inefficient light water reactors because the uranium
fuel cycle
produces bomb grade materials
• nuclear power will be substantially
cheaper than fossil
fuel electricity generation •
cheap electricity substitutes for some gas for heating and oil for land transport (as in electric vehicles and low - cost electricity
producing energy carriers).
Some experts believe that algae is set to eclipse all other biofuel feedstocks as the
cheapest, easiest, and most environmentally friendly way to
produce liquid
fuel.
A team of Renewable Energy experts from the University of Exeter has pioneered a new technique to
produce hydrogen from sunlight to create a clean,
cheap and widely - available
fuel.
it seems a waste of a resource to bury it in the Antarctic when it could be combined with hydrogen to
produce an endless supply of
cheap liquid
fuels.
Carbon capture from air seems simple and industrially scalable — see for instance http://www.carbonengineering.com/ — but it seems a waste of a resource to bury it in the Antarctic when it could be combined with hydrogen to
produce an endless supply of
cheap liquid
fuels.
«Why isn't Russia tripping all over itself
producing and selling
cheap synthetic
fuels?»
I agree with Bjorn Lomborg and many others that the only viable answer is technologic innovation which
produces a
cheaper alternative to fossil
fuel.
A project of that size could help bring down the cost of
producing solar power to be competitive with the price of
cheap fossil
fuel - based electricity.
Before much longer the
cheapest fuel will be made by synthetic organisms with metabolisms re-designed to
produce paraffins as the primary metabolic product.
Wind is now
cheaper than fossil
fuels in
producing electricity in Australia, the world's biggest coal exporter, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.
These sources of energy and efficiency technologies are in many cases
cheaper than fossils, have steep cost curves,
produce a positive ROI for businesses and consumers, are anti-inflationary because they don't use a commodity
fuel or consume less
fuel, have the ability to decentralize and stabilize energy supply.
I'm willing to make the following wager — that it is far easier to prove the benefits of
cheap energy, of whatever
fuel source, to the Earth's population than it is to prove the harm that will derive from
producing that energy.
Get an up - close look at how Mary Njenga's briquette formula can
produce cheap, clean
fuel and a sustainable business for women in Kenya for about two cents each.
How do you propose getting those developments to take place, given that the «free market» situation we have now had not
produced results sufficient to provide energy
cheap enough for much of the planet, and given that future acquisition of fossil
fuels is likely to be more costly environmentally as well as economically?
The paper notes that poor people are most likely to be affected, as they typically lack access to electricity and have to resort to
cheaper fuels that
produce more indoor smoke.
The AVE AERO mimics nature
producing renewable energy
cheaper than fossil
fuelled plants by extracting energy from rising warm air.
The earth's climate sensitivity is the most important climate factor in determining how much global warming will result from our greenhouse gas emissions (primarily from burning of fossil
fuels to
produce, reliable,
cheap energy).
Cheap and plentiful uranium, together with the plutonium
produced by uranium use, could
fuel nuclear plants for the foreseeable future.
Once we have
cheap nuclear power, we'll be in a much better position to get low emissions transport
fuels —
fuels produced by
cheap electricity, and electricity replacing gas for heating and oil for some transport.
Another thing is that, global production of goods mostly happens in those «
cheap» countries, so they can hardly be criticised for having
fuel pollution issues can they as they
produce probably 80 % of the worlds goods.
It's also important to point out why fossil
fuel electricity is relatively
cheap in the United States: The behind - the - scenes costs of burning
fuel that
produces carbon dioxide and noxious pollutants — health care costs, environmental cleanup, and the current and future expenses of adapting to a warmer world — are not included in the US electric bill.
Though not yet ready for commercial production, the Indiana - based company says that it has developed a bio-aviation
fuel made from landfill waste, sorghum, algae and wood chips which it says will be
cheaper to
produce and perform better than current aviation
fuels.
Currently fossil -
fuel generation is
cheaper than most non-CO2
producing types, largely because the plant operators don't have to pay to dispose of their waste products.
What I foresee is a more efficient engine which
produces more power with less
fuel, and that
fuel, whatever it is, is plentiful,
cheap to refine and safe to use.
The real clean energy race is thus to invent, commercialize, progressively improve, and mass -
produce cheap and reliable clean energy technologies that can compete on cost not just with international competitors but also with fossil
fuels.
The state's Columbia River -
fueled dams are famous for their hydroelectric power, which
produces cheap energy rates and which is an attractive feature for people interested in the electricity - intensive process of creating more digital coins.