Not exact matches
And it maybe goes both ways, but I know that in radio astronomy, for example, they have taken advantage
of a lot
of the — and presumably in other
kinds of astronomy as well, they've taken advantage
of the, you know, how
cheap storage is now and processing power to do really hugely data - intensive observations with off - the - shelf
technologies, and they've used graphics processors to, you know, do things they could only do before with custom fabricated chips, which were obviously extremely expensive.
Having said that, i believe that China for example is really experiencing the
kind of pollution that US did in the 50 and 60's, and that they are better equipped to move more forcibly and quicker than the US did, one reason is that no rational being would deploy techninology that is outdated,,, they would leapfrog to the newwer
technology when building infrastructure... One might be able to argue that it is
cheaper and more beneficial for developed to support that... That and the belief i have that they may not, as you point, want to experihence the consumption addiction that US incurred... (Note; the Europeans are substantially less than the US per capita emissions, a benefit
of greater foresight — evidence that this is not a «western» problem
So what
kind of electric generation
technology could end up
cheaper than coal - fired generation is today?
Depending on what
kind of technology you're using, solar could either be
cheaper than coal, gas, and nuclear... or it could be one
of the most expensive energy sources out there.