Sentences with phrase «cheapest valuations based»

OmniVision Technologies (NYSE: OVTI) has one of the cheapest valuations based on forward P / E among semiconductor stocks.

Not exact matches

While it may no longer be the only innovative company out there, with cheap valuations and a still dedicated consumer base, there's a good chance this stock will rebound.
On a valuation basis, these stocks, and by extension, XEG, are cheap.
Equity markets have appreciated sharply in recent years, and valuations, based on price - to - earnings ratios, in developed markets were not cheap relative to their historical averages as of late 2017.
For many of these banks, valuations look cheap both historically and based on global ratios.
Value strategies that buy (sell) cheap (expensive) firms from groups matched on the quality dimension significantly outperform value strategies formed solely on the basis of valuations.
Based on 20 years of global data and nearly 90 years of US data, the energy sector has never been cheaper on price - to - book multiples than it was at the end of 2015.1 The skeptics» response to these compelling headline valuations tends to be suspicion of book values, which indeed are likely overstated in some instances and vulnerable to further impairment.
Looking back through history, whenever value stocks have gotten this cheap, subsequent long - term returns have generally been strong.3 From current depressed valuation levels, value stocks have in the past, on average, doubled over the next five years.4 Not that we necessarily expect returns of this magnitude this time around, but based on the data and our six decades of experience investing through various market cycles, we believe the current risk / reward proposition is heavily skewed in favor of long - term value investors.
Great post.i think time horizon and diversification are the key factors from my experience.The passive screenens works best on a basket of companies.if you have picked one or two cheap stocks based on valuation only most of the time they are cheap for the right reason and they turns out to be a value trap.However, on basket approach the averages will take care, so winners will take care of the losers.
The B / P value factor is trading very cheap when we gauge its valuation based on its own historical norms, meaning that the spread between the highest and lowest B / P stocks is far wider than typically observed in the past.
When relative valuation is gauged using the aggregate measure (reported in the right-most column of Tables 1 and 2 for both aggregate and P / B valuations), we find that the cheapest stocks based on B / P are no longer cheap.
Just because a stock is cheap on a book value basis does not mean that it's cheap 0nce its debt load is factored into the valuation.
Many stocks will appear cheap based on historical valuations, but past bull market valuations will not be helpful again for a long time.
From a valuation standpoint, the stocks that High Dividend Yield owns are also just slightly cheaper than the holdings of Dividend Appreciation, at least on a trailing earnings basis.
This can not be considered cheap if you are looking at asset based valuation measures.
Valuation: IMN is cheap based on a number of valuationValuation: IMN is cheap based on a number of valuationvaluation metrics.
While these markets still offer the best growth opportunities & ever - cheaper valuations (I'm tempted on a regular basis)... as I detailed last year, fund flows & sentiment suggest developed markets will keep leading the way, while any kind of serious market reversal seems likely to impact emerging & frontier markets just as severely.
(my view on valuation is that, based on the S&P 500 earnings, stocks are neither cheap nor expensive.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z