Sentences with phrase «check on climate modeling»

It did, providing yet another independent accuracy check on climate modeling, or at least the climate model (s) that was used by the scientists involved in this study.

Not exact matches

He said that if he had to rely on the European Space Agency's limited, difficult - to - access data for his work checking climate model predictions against reality, he'd be «more or less blind» — particularly in the vast, uninhabited stretches of the globe like the Pacific, which are vital for understanding the world climate.

Scientists are checking advanced climate simulation models against existing data to find that they're running right on track to better predict drastic climate change

In addition, past data can be used to provide independent estimates of climate sensitivity, which provide a reality check on the models.

As with the 2017 model, a smartphone app allows owners to remotely check battery status, start charging, turn on the climate control, and find their car in a crowded parking lot.

In addition, past data can be used to provide independent estimates of climate sensitivity, which provide a reality check on the models.

These same models can be used to simulate climates in the past when CO2 levels were higher, and checked against the fossil record (link to page on past climate).

I have found myself in this situation several times, where I needed to check on various aspects of a climate model simulation (i.e. has the ocean temperature stabilized?).

Regarding gritty details on existing models, check eg this climate modeling FAQ, which finishes with the question

On November 3, 2017, the Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences put out a press release concerning the quality check of climate models:

Unless your disagreement with climate science is very particular, on a subtle point; where the predictions can be checked without reference to a full model, your not even doing science (or at best, your alternative climate science is as undeveloped as standard climate science was at that and the end of the 19th century).

Within a few years, after his unprincipled, unsupported and unscientific attacks on climate «sceptics», my opinion had changed, to what it is now, that he's the very model of an unthinking and ill - informed little s ** t. Presenting «evidence» that you haven't checked out yourself is both irresponsible and unscientific, as is accepting «current thinking» or some form of consensus without questioning it in any way.