Insurers will also
check other data sources to determine term life insurance quotes.
Not exact matches
This is quite likely to be the case: Statistics Canada has many
other sources of information that can be used as a
check against the NHS: tax files can be used for income, CMHC
data for housing, and so on.
We'll also
check the prices of similar vehicles from
other industry recognized
sources and from auction
data.
After all, the NYT bestseller list is based (so they tell us) on anonymous and supposedly widely
sourced data from a lot of bookstores, and wholesales who retail to
other outlets... And has: 1) reputedly been cooked before 2) As we don't know the methodology is hard to
check — but we know some very popular books never make it, and books which don't sell that many copies (17K hardback was reputed to get you onto the extend list, according to a friend who got there on that) 3) We know Bookscan
data is pretty close to GIGO — so it's hard to see where the NYT would get better
data.
If I am foolish enough not to look at
other relevant
data that would affect the outcome of my assertion, then that is what I am, a fool, though Fred Singer would simply smile and say, no, «the world is flat»; «smoking is not bad for your health»; CFC's do not harm the ozone... you need to
check the
source and the history behind the
source to get more perspective.
On the
other hand, you do want to know if some single dataset is dominating the conclusion (because the whole point of pooling a lot of
data sources is to avoid that), so scientists will frequently engage in sensitivity analysis, deleting one dataset or another, and
checking to see whether the conclusion is altered meaningfully.
On the
other hand, capabilities like Wifi,
Data, GPS, Bluetooth, Camera, or NFC are working perfectly so you have nothing to worry about (for more details
check our
source page by going here).