Not exact matches
Specifically, I got the impression that the EC members were supposed to exercise some sort of double -
check on the candidate's validity, character and
legal qualifications (e.g. lack of conflicts - of - interest) and thereby moderate the influence of pure populism on the outcome, at least to some extent.
A system which «double -
check on the candidate's validity, character and
legal qualifications» exists in Iran.
The LSUC says that lawyers have a professional to
check the
qualifications of opposing medico -
legal experts — and to challenge them whenever it is appropriate to do so.
But how can triers of fact hope to discharge their gatekeeping responsibilities if nether the insurer defence lawyers nor plaintiff lawyers are actually
checking to ensure the medico -
legal experts have the
qualification they claim to have?
The real question is not whether this behavior is «reprehensible» - but why so many plaintiff lawyers so often fail to
check the
qualifications of the insurers» medico -
legal «experts» and aggressively challenge them whenever it is appropriate to do so (as the LSUC says they should).
Those interested in a
Legal Secretary position can
check similar
qualifications in the cover letter sample provided below.