The measure aims to make
chemical safety reviews more science - based, and includes provisions designed to reduce the use of animals in chemical testing and promote the study of so - called cancer clusters.
Not exact matches
This work resulted in passage of the historic Food
Safety Modernization Act, reforms to the Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS)
review process and passage of the Toxic Substances Control Act, which made important improvements to the nation's
chemicals management laws.
Most flavoring
chemicals also occur in nature and are probably safe, but FDA does not
review their
safety, and a few have been shown to cause cancer in animals and should not be permitted.»
Review of duplication between agricultural and veterinary
chemical and work health and
safety legislation
HR 2576 updates the 40 - year - old Toxic Substances Control Act by removing barriers to repeat
chemical testing, mandating new
safety reviews, and making information more available to the public.
Under the current system,
chemical companies perform
safety tests or farm them out to contractors, then submit data for
review at the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and other agencies.
An international consortium of scientists that was recently assembled to
review the science on BPA for the German UmweltBundesAmt (that country's equivalent of the Environmental Protection Agency) determined that the research FDA used in its
safety assessment was flawed because it failed to consider the
chemical's effects on behavior and prostate development, according to a copy of the group's conclusions provided to ScientificAmerican.com.
With tens of thousands of
chemicals in commerce whose
safety has never been
reviewed, the bill would task EPA with first
reviewing the
safety of
chemicals that the agency deems as a high priority, in the tens of
chemicals at a time.
Since 1986, when a new
chemical is approved or an old one
reviewed, the Advisory Committee on Pesticides is obliged to publish an evaluation of its
safety and efficiency.
It should begin by reforming and strengthening the Toxic Substances Control Act to require
reviews of
chemicals for
safety, force manufacturers to provide adequate health data on any
chemical under
review, and empower agencies to restrict or ban the use of
chemicals with clear evidence of harm.
That means it's a
chemical that has not seen a lot of
safety reviews.»
Most flavoring
chemicals also occur in nature and are probably safe, but FDA does not
review their
safety, and a few have been shown to cause cancer in animals and should not be permitted.»
The new
chemical safety law prompts EWG to list the highest - priority toxic
chemicals that desperately need
review.
More than a dozen Texas
chemical and refining plants reported damaged storage tanks, ruptured containment systems and malfunctioning pressure relief valves as a result of Hurricane Harvey, portending
safety problems that might not become apparent for months or years, according to a Houston Chronicle
review of regulatory filings.
But the association representing makers of the
chemicals, the Virginia - based Silicones Environmental Health and
Safety Council of North America, denied that its intervention temporarily halted the government's
chemical review process.
From Civil Eats: «Maricel Maffini [author of a 2013 study on data gaps in toxicity testing of
chemicals allowed in U.S. foods] suggests the FDA's current system of approving food additives could be improved by requiring additive
safety to be
reviewed periodically and by basing
safety information on how much people actually eat.»
Established and managed
chemical procurement,
safety review, storage, use, and disposal all products purchased in support of our contract.