If we could use computers to predict whether a compound would have a toxic effect on people,
chemical safety testing would be a lot simpler.
Rudel leads a program to develop breast cancer - relevant
chemical safety tests for green chemistry.
Not exact matches
They emphasize heavily that the materials they use are carefully
tested for
chemicals to ensure
safety for the consumer and the environment.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the nation's chief food
safety regulator, plans to start
testing certain foods for residues of the world's most widely used weed killer after the World Health Organization's cancer experts last year declared the
chemical a probable human carcinogen.
Currently in Australia, cosmetics (broadly defined as skin, hair, beauty, personal, baby, men's, candles — basically any product that you find on the cosmetics floor of a department store) contain
chemicals that have mostly never been
tested for
safety and that are used in cosmetics on the basis they are safe until proven otherwise.
Chemical testing New agricultural
chemicals are only
safety tested...
Don't forget to sign the MomsRising online petition to tell Congress and the Consumer Product
Safety Commission (CPSC): «
Testing children's products for toxic
chemicals must be a priority.
The non-toxic finish has been
tested for lead and other toxic
chemicals and exceeds government and ASTM
safety standards.
Different substances to
test (I use bicarbonate of soda and vinegar and water but you could try any other substance in the home as long as supervised and act with caution) Wearing latex gloves and goggles are good
safety practices when using
chemicals.
BPA is only one of thousands of synthetic
chemicals on the market that either have no
safety testing data or have failed
safety tests.
I'm wondering... when
safety tests were done for medications (like antibiotics, PPIs, NSAIDs), novel food additives, agricultural
chemicals, etc... did anybody demonstrate that these things do NOT have a negative impact on the microbiome?
But most of the thousands of
chemicals on the market are not
tested for
safety by anyone other than the manufacturer, and they are not regulated to protect a developing baby.
When buying products from a reputable producer, they should be able to provide you with information about the materials, the
chemicals they contain, the
safety testing they've undergone, etc..
The Henry and Jordan MESAs are the only car seats to pass rigorous fire
safety testing without the use of fire retardant
chemicals.
Unsurpassed
testing for material
safety — our products undergo rigorous
chemical and biologic
testing to insure they do not contain toxic
chemicals
To see if I am the only one out there who feels totally overwhelmed by the «watch - outs» and the warnings and the names of
chemicals I can neither spell nor pronounce, I created the quiz below to
test your baby personal care product
safety savvy.
As far as
safety goes, the bed meets all ASTM and CPSC standards, and has been
tested for toxic
chemicals.
A recent round of state
tests on 145 water wells in the town of Hoosick and village of Hoosick Falls showed slightly less than a third indicated a presence of a toxic
chemical at levels exceeding the
safety threshold recently set by the Environmental Protection Agency.
A Rensselaer County community is awaiting further
testing to determine if a
chemical found in its water supply poses a threat to health and
safety.
HR 2576 updates the 40 - year - old Toxic Substances Control Act by removing barriers to repeat
chemical testing, mandating new
safety reviews, and making information more available to the public.
Under the current system,
chemical companies perform
safety tests or farm them out to contractors, then submit data for review at the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and other agencies.
«Cosmetic products that contain known human carcinogens or
chemicals that impair human reproduction or development are marketed and sold without adequate
safety tests because the existing law allows it,» he said.
The problems are not entirely the fault of the EPA; policies for
safety testing under current
chemical regulations are flawed [see «Chemical Controls»; Perspectives, Scientific American,
chemical regulations are flawed [see «
Chemical Controls»; Perspectives, Scientific American,
Chemical Controls»; Perspectives, Scientific American, April].
The agency is responding to a report written by 12 scientists who criticized the government's decades - old strategy for
testing the
safety of many
chemicals found in the environment and consumer products
Like all
chemical companies, Syngenta has to have its products
tested for
safety before the EPA will approve them.
The law requires no specific
tests before a company brings a new product with a new
chemical to market, and it does not require companies to release whatever
safety data they may collect.
The companies that make the 80,000
chemicals that circulate in our world are rarely required to do
safety testing, and government agencies are relatively powerless.
The measure aims to make
chemical safety reviews more science - based, and includes provisions designed to reduce the use of animals in
chemical testing and promote the study of so - called cancer clusters.
The basic premise of
safety testing for
chemicals is that anything can kill you in high enough doses (even too much water too fast can be lethal).
«
Chemicals that break down water contaminants pass
safety test.»
Our collaborations with industry, government agencies, and academia focus on developing new disease models, elucidating new therapeutic targets to develop treatments,
safety testing on new
chemical entities, enabling better and safer design of new consumer products, and new applications in personalized healthcare.
In this presentation, we discuss data from studies conducted with academic, clinical, and industry collaborators that demonstrates the utility of the system as a more predictive, human - relevant alternative for efficacy and
safety testing of new
chemical entitites.
There are tens of thousands of
chemicals in the personal care products we encounter daily, and most of these
chemicals have not been
tested for long - term
safety.
Plus, it's cheaper, gentle on my garments and bedsheets, and prevents me from being exposed to the industrial
chemicals that are hardly ever
tested for
safety.
In fact, of the more than 10,000
chemical ingredients used in our personal care products, 89 percent have not undergone
safety testing.
We are not separate from our environment, and we swim in a soup of toxic
chemicals, many of which have not been
tested for human
safety.
The Environmental Protection Agency has mandated
safety testing for only a small percentage of these
chemicals.
What we face today is a world where we come into contact with more than eighty thousand
chemicals, many of which have not been
tested for
safety.
Vaccine
safety for all, including independent
testing and research of vaccines and the ingredients they contain, as well as the synchronicity effect of using multiple toxic
chemicals together when injected into the human body.
There are literally thousands of
chemicals used in cosmetics, and only a tiny fraction of them have ever been
tested for
safety.
Most human and veterinary Omega supplements do not contain adequate levels of Omega 3 fatty acids and many even contain dangerous degraded fatty acids and toxic
chemicals that are individually batch
tested for
safety, purity and efficacy.
From Civil Eats: «Maricel Maffini [author of a 2013 study on data gaps in toxicity
testing of
chemicals allowed in U.S. foods] suggests the FDA's current system of approving food additives could be improved by requiring additive
safety to be reviewed periodically and by basing
safety information on how much people actually eat.»
Notes Scientific American of the perfumes
tested: «Among them are
chemicals associated with hormone disruption and allergic reactions, and many substances that have not been assessed for
safety in personal care products.»
And while it might seem daunting or feel too late (after all, 62,000
chemicals were grandfathered in with no
safety testing when the Toxics Safety Control Act was passed in 1976), there are strong past successes from which to draw inspiration, like the banning of lead in wall paint and gasoline, after which average human blood lead levels dropped impressively, or the Canadian trend to ban aesthetic pesticid
safety testing when the Toxics
Safety Control Act was passed in 1976), there are strong past successes from which to draw inspiration, like the banning of lead in wall paint and gasoline, after which average human blood lead levels dropped impressively, or the Canadian trend to ban aesthetic pesticid
Safety Control Act was passed in 1976), there are strong past successes from which to draw inspiration, like the banning of lead in wall paint and gasoline, after which average human blood lead levels dropped impressively, or the Canadian trend to ban aesthetic pesticide use.
Our clients are often looking for legal support and commercial input at the product design and
testing stage, for example, and have questions on
chemicals and labelling and packaging, and general product
safety and compliance issues.
Further, the Supreme Court noted that
safety has never been held to justify random
testing even in the case of «highly
safety sensitive» or «inherently dangerous workplaces» such as railways and
chemical plants or those that pose a risk of explosion in the absence of a «demonstrated problem with alcohol use in that workplace» (CEP at para 45).
These include, but are not limited to, familiarity with
chemicals and equipment used in the lab, specific awareness about the
safety codes, laws, and standard practices employed in this profession; and deriving correct conclusions from
tests.
Occupational Health and
Safety Officer SEDONA COMPASS, Binghamton, NY (1/1995 to 6/2002) • Inspected workplace area and equipment to determine possible hazardous situations • Ascertained the workplaces conformed to organizational procedures and safety standards • Trained personnel to make good use of protective equipment such as hearing protection, dust masks, safety glasses and safety helmets • Oversaw the storage of dangerous materials such as chemicals • Identified and test workplaces for potential accident and health hazards such as toxic fumes and gas - air mixtures • Took corrective actions to ensure eradication of hazardous materials in t
Safety Officer SEDONA COMPASS, Binghamton, NY (1/1995 to 6/2002) • Inspected workplace area and equipment to determine possible hazardous situations • Ascertained the workplaces conformed to organizational procedures and
safety standards • Trained personnel to make good use of protective equipment such as hearing protection, dust masks, safety glasses and safety helmets • Oversaw the storage of dangerous materials such as chemicals • Identified and test workplaces for potential accident and health hazards such as toxic fumes and gas - air mixtures • Took corrective actions to ensure eradication of hazardous materials in t
safety standards • Trained personnel to make good use of protective equipment such as hearing protection, dust masks,
safety glasses and safety helmets • Oversaw the storage of dangerous materials such as chemicals • Identified and test workplaces for potential accident and health hazards such as toxic fumes and gas - air mixtures • Took corrective actions to ensure eradication of hazardous materials in t
safety glasses and
safety helmets • Oversaw the storage of dangerous materials such as chemicals • Identified and test workplaces for potential accident and health hazards such as toxic fumes and gas - air mixtures • Took corrective actions to ensure eradication of hazardous materials in t
safety helmets • Oversaw the storage of dangerous materials such as
chemicals • Identified and
test workplaces for potential accident and health hazards such as toxic fumes and gas - air mixtures • Took corrective actions to ensure eradication of hazardous materials in the air
National Steel (Ecorse, MI) 12/1995 — 2/2001 General Foreman — Coke Making and By - products
Chemical Plant Staff • Held responsibility for day - to - day operations of coke production equipment and related shift employees, targeting area - specific goals that would provide a $ 4M bonus per year towards company capital • Led daily operational meetings with shift managers to disseminate valuable information and promote staff
safety • Provide relevant and appropriate disciplinary action to both hourly and salaried employees • Audited
safety meetings and
safety contacts as well as
tested staff knowledge of SOPS, JSA, and TOS • Oversaw planning maintenance outages, collaborating with department heads and external contractors for efficient execution
Professional Duties & Responsibilities Managed all daily operations in each zone of Ford's Trim and Chassis Departments Oversaw manufacturing processes, 120 employee team, and final product quality Served on company Continuous Progress Improvement teams developing best practices Observed product manufacturing process and recommended improvement strategies Reduced personnel overtime, manpower, and production scrap while increasing efficiency Identified design flaws, offered remedial measures, and implemented changes Received numerous awards for process and product improvement recommendations Ensured product and manufacturing process compliance with all applicable laws Chosen to lead the launch of multiple products from Ford's Kentucky and Kansas plants Directed and improved the 2009 F - 150 Product Development Launch Team Met all production and launch timelines while remaining compliant with ISO - 9001 standards Responsible for the enforcement of all
safety protocols and procedures Handled union contract negotiations and grievance discourses Leader of and participant in Ford's Diversity Committee Participated in company workshops focused on environmental preservation techniques Performed environmental
safety examinations including air and
chemical emission
testing Maintained machinery ensuring effective and safe operation Completed all assignments in a professional and positive manner