Reports are coming in that at least 58 people are dead in what witnesses call
a chemical weapons strike in northern Syria.
Not exact matches
Experts tell Business Insider that the S - 300 likely could not stop another US
strike like the one on April 14, where 105 missiles hit three suspected
chemical weapons sites in the country.
Syrian air defenses activated and fired interceptor missiles during the US, UK, and France's missile
strike on the country's suspected
chemical weapons sites, but only two of those reportedly had a chance of hitting their targets.
Saturday's
strikes by the U.S., Britain and France were in retaliation for a suspected
chemical weapons attack by the Syrian military in eastern Ghouta.
Markets digested the U.S. - led military
strike on Syria that targeted
chemical weapons facilities.
Ryan Bohl, a Middle East analyst at the geopolitical consulting firm Stratfor, told Business Insider that though Syria's
chemical weapons facilities lay under the umbrella of Russia's air defenses, they were not actually close enough that a
strike on the facilities would endanger Russian troops.
Markets also digested the U.S. - led military
strike on Syria on Friday U.S. hours that targeted
chemical weapons facilities in the country.
Obama gave The Atlantic several reasons for not enforcing the red line — uneasiness about a
strike against Syria not being sanctioned by Congress, a lack of support from the international community and the American people, the possibility that the intelligence on the
chemical -
weapons attack wasn't 100 % solid — but did not mention the Iran deal among them.
Defense Secretary James Mattis called the
strikes a «one time shot» aimed at the Syrian government's
chemical weapons infrastructure.
And Pentagon spokesman Capt. Jeff Davis said that the
strike «has severely damaged or destroyed Syrian aircraft and support infrastructure and equipment at Shayrat airfield, reducing the Syrian government's ability to deliver
chemical weapons.»
WASHINGTON / BEIRUT, April 14 - U.S., British and French forces launched air
strikes on Syria in response to a suspected poison gas attack that killed dozens of people, aiming to degrade its
chemical weapons capabilities in the biggest intervention yet in the conflict by Western powers.
A U.S. official familiar with the military planning said there could be more air
strikes if the intelligence indicates Assad had not stopped making, importing, storing or using
chemical weapons, including chlorine.
WASHINGTON / BEIRUT, April 14 (Reuters)- Air
strikes by U.S., British and French forces crippled Syria's
chemical weapons program and all missiles launched hit their targets, the Pentagon said on Saturday as President Donald Trump declared «Mission Accomplished.»
WASHINGTON / BEIRUT, April 14 - U.S., British and French forces
struck Syria with more than 100 missiles on Saturday in the first coordinated Western
strikes against the Damascus government, targetting what they called
chemical weapons sites in retaliation for a poison gas attack.
The Trump administration is likely trying to get broader support from allies for air
strikes on Syria in response to a suspected
chemical weapons attack, says Victor Kattan of the Middle East Institute.
On Friday, President Donald Trump ordered U.S. forces to join France and Britain in launching targeted
strikes in Syria, in retaliation for an attack on civilians that employed
chemical weapons.
The Pentagon described the U.S. - led coalition intervention in Syria as successful, adding that the military
strike crippled the regime's
chemical weapons infrastructure.
The U.S. - led
strike on Syria in response to a suspected
chemical weapons attack by Bashar al - Assad's forces was specific and not part of a wider campaign, says Dakota Wood of the Heritage Foundation.
WASHINGTON / BEIRUT, April 14 - Air
strikes by U.S., British and French forces crippled Syria's
chemical weapons program and all missiles launched hit their targets, the Pentagon said on Saturday as President Donald Trump declared «Mission Accomplished.»
U.S., British and French forces pounded Iran's ally Syria with air
strikes early on Saturday in retaliation for a suspected April 7
chemical weapons attack, which they blame on Syrian President Bashar al - Assad's government.
In Bronk's view, Russia most likely pressures Syria not to use
chemical weapons, on the grounds that they raise the risk of a US
strike and aren't needed militarily.
Based on intelligence gathered by Syrian and Russian air defense crews from the U.S.
strike exactly a year and a week ago on Shayrat Airbase in Syria, air defense crews were likely well - drilled and prepared to meet a U.S. - led attack on their claimed
chemical weapons facilities.
The metal's price jumped markedly after Trump warned Russia to «get ready» for a missile
strike in Syria following a recent
chemical weapons attack allegedly carried out by the government of Syrian President Bashar Assad.
Eric Brammer, 30, an information technology specialist from Roanoke, Virginia, who describes himself as Democrat, said he expects tensions to continue over Russia's support of the government of President Bashar Assad in civil war - wracked Syria, where the U.S., Britain and France last week launched missile
strikes against Syrian
chemical weapons facilities.
«It seems new national security advisor John Bolton could be starting his first day in the White House in the worst way possible: by having to plan a military
strike on Assad's ability to deliver
chemical weapons attacks in Syria,» Harry Kazianis, director of defense studies at the Center for the National Interest, told CNBC.
But reports of
chemical attacks have surfaced regularly since then, and Islamist rebels fighting in the town of Douma — the site of the suspected
chemical attack earlier this month that sparked the US and allies»
strike on Friday — say Assad is using the terrifying
weapons to win on the battlefield.
The UK has acknowledged that the intention of the
strikes was not to turn the overall tide in the war and was essentially meant as a punitive action to compel Assad not to use
chemical weapons.
«If President Trump had ordered the
strike only to show that the US responded to [Syrian President Bashar] Assad's use of
chemical weapons, then that goal has been achieved,» Israel's Ynetnews quoted a senior defense official as saying.
The US said the
strikes hit the «heart» of Syria's
chemical weapons infrastructure but acknowledged that some «residual» capabilities remained.
The
strike by the US, the UK, and France in Syria on Friday involved 105 missiles fired from air and sea to rain down thousands of pounds of explosives on three targets suspected of being
chemical weapons facilities — but Israeli officials cited in a recent news report characterized it as a failure.
The combined U.S., British and French assault involved more missiles, but appears to have
struck more limited targets, than a similar
strike Trump ordered a year ago in retaliation for an earlier suspected
chemical weapons attack.
The Pentagon said there had been
chemical weapons agents at one of the targets, and that the
strikes had significantly crippled Syria's ability to produce such
weapons.
But on Thursday, he tweeted that a U.S. missile
strike on Syria in response to its alleged use of
chemical weapons may not be imminent.
The Western countries said the
strikes were aimed at preventing more Syrian
chemical weapons attacks after a suspected poison gas attack in Douma on April 7 killed up to 75 people.
WASHINGTON / BEIRUT, April 14 (Reuters)- Western powers said on Saturday their missile attacks
struck at the heart of Syria's
chemical weapons program, but the restrained assault appeared unlikely to shift the course of the 7 - year - old civil war.
The British government said in a statement the U.S. missile
strikes were an appropriate response to the «barbaric
chemical weapons attack» launched by the Syrian government.
Zakharova suggested that Western media should shoulder some responsibility for the
strikes, claiming the White House cited «multiple media sources» on the suspected
chemical weapons attack in Douma.
Defense spending aside, transatlantic rifts could also occur should Trump continue to make critical foreign policy decisions without first consulting allies (as in the April 7 air
strike against Syria in response to a
chemical -
weapons attack) or if he presses NATO allies to make stronger military contributions in Syria or Afghanistan.
Trump has said that the U.S. government will decide whether or not to
strike Syria «very quickly» in response to the alleged
chemical weapons attack.
The US did provide Russia with advance warning via military channels shortly prior to the April 2017 missile
strike on the Syrian air base believed responsible for a previous
chemical weapons attack.
The measures come as President Donald Trump is threatening an imminent military
strike against Syria, vowing to respond «forcefully» to Saturday's apparent
chemical weapons attack on civilians.
The U.S. just levied fresh sanctions against the Eastern European country for its alleged meddling in the 2016 presidential election, and early last week President Donald Trump warned Russia that the U.S. military could soon
strike its ally Syria in response to its use of
chemical weapons — a promise he kept Friday evening.
The likelihood of a United States
strike against Syria after a suspected
chemical weapons attack increased Sunday as President Trump said there would be a «big price to pay» and officials in France vowed the country would «do its duty» in responding.
International investigators will head on Wednesday to the site of an alleged
chemical weapons attack in Syria that provoked a U.S. - led missile
strike.
No escalation of tensions after Syria
strike Markets breathed a sigh of relief this week after last weekend's
strike by US, British and French forces on Syrian facilities thought to be associated with
chemical weapons.
Nervous investors are waiting to see if the U.S. will launch a military
strike on Syria for its alleged use of
chemical weapons.
Syria's air defense system failed to defend against the U.S. - led
strike on the country's
chemical weapons facilities two weeks ago.
Eventually, the US and Russia agreed on a deal to destroy Syria's
chemical weapons, ending the
strike threat.
The missiles
struck infrastructure at the airfield, according to the administration, but did not target
chemical weapons storage facilities because of the potential for civilian casualties.
Prime Minister Theresa May has insisted there was no alternative to the air -
strikes, following a
chemical weapons attack in Douma last week that killed 75 people, including children.