Sentences with phrase «chest protection»

For the rear passenger dummy, a combination of chest compression and high shoulder belt load indicated poor chest protection, and that of the neck was rated as marginal.

The rear passenger dummy had a marginal level of chest protection but all other critical body areas were well protected.

The driver dummy scores maximum points, with good protection of all body critical regions and the passenger dummy lost only a fraction of a point, with adequate chest protection.

Chest protection for the 6 year dummy was rated as marginal.

In the frontal offset test, dummy readings in the 6 year dummy indicated marginal chest protection but, otherwise, protection was good or adequate for both dummies.

In the offset crash test, the Exora scored 10.55 out of 16 points — driver chest protection was acceptable and leg protection was marginal.

In the more severe side pole impact, dummy readings of lateral rib compression indicated weak chest protection and the head protection was downgraded to adequate as a result of the incorrect airbag deployment.

SRS side airbags also provide chest protection, while SRS curtain - shield airbags aim to reduce head injuries.

Chest protection for the rear passenger dummy was adequate and that of the driver dummy was again marginal.

Protection of the 6 year dummy, sat in a high - back booster, was rated as good and adequate for the head and neck respectively but dummy readings of chest deceleration indicated marginal chest protection.

In the frontal offset test, readings from the 6 year dummy indicated poor chest protection and weak protection of the neck.

In the side impact crash test, it managed 14.82 out of 16 points — driver chest protection was listed as acceptable.

In the more severe side pole impact, dummy readings of rib compression indicated a marginal level of chest protection.

Also standard are front seat side - impact supplemental air bags for chest protection and roof - mounted curtain side - impact air bags for front and rear outboard occupant head protection.

In the side pole impact of the XF, chest protection was rated as weak and the car's seat and head restraint provided marginal whiplash protection.

The dummy's chest struck the steering wheel and this, together with the unstable body structure, meant that chest protection was rated as poor.

However, in the more severe side pole test, chest protection was rated as poor due to high shoulder loads.

In the frontal offset test, readings from the 6 year dummy indicated good head protection, marginal chest protection and a weak level of protection for the neck.

Driver chest protection was rated as marginal, based on dummy readings of compression In the full - width rigid barrier frontal impact, protection of both the driver and rear passenger dummies was rated as good, except for the chest, protection of which was adequate.

For the 6 - year dummy, neck and chest protection were rated as marginal, based on dummy readings.

In the side barrier impact, decelerations indicated poor chest protection and weak head protection for the 10 year dummy.

In the side barrier test, chest protection was rated as marginal, based on rib compressions.

Chest protection was rated as marginal based on dummy readings of rib compression.

Dummy readings indicated adequate chest protection for the driver dummy and marginal chest protection for the rear passenger.

Nissan Advanced Air Bag System (AABS)(includes dual - stage front supplemental air bags and front seat side - impact supplemental air bags for chest protection)

Chest protection for the rear passenger was marginal but that of other body regions was good or adequate.

Chest protection for the rear passenger was rated as marginal, based on dummy readings of chest compression, but that of other parts of the body was good or adequate.

In the Ka +, chest protection was rated as poor.