Sentences with phrase «child against his father»
Mothers don't protect their children against fathers who molest and quite often cover it up and / or tell the child they are lying.
https://nakedpastor.com/
Attorneys for the mother, Maya Eibschitz - Tsimhoni, claimed the children's father, Omer Tsimhoni, was abusive, while his legal team maintained the mother had waged a deliberate, long - running campaign to poison the children against their father.
Since the divorce, Sydney says, she has done all she could to turn the children against their father and grandparents.
She alleged that the mother was «poisoning» her child against his father.
Sarcasm, criticism, and efforts to align with the children against the father are also noted.
I accept the evidence of Dr. McDermott on this issue and note that there was no challenge by mother's counsel regarding her finding that the mother had alienated the child against her father....
However, this term has been controversial from the start, because it was almost exclusively used to blame mothers for intentionally turning their children against their fathers.
According to PAS theory, if a parent (usually mom) accuses the other (usually dad) of sexual abuse, this «turns the child against the father,» hence, mom's «influence over the child should be halted.»
The mother and maternal grandmother were alienating the child against her father and constantly obstructing him from seeing her.
Through this psychological foundation she turns the children against their father.
Soon, PAS became a hot issue in gender wars, especially when women began losing legal custody of their children when a court ruled that they were guilty of alienating a child against the father.
Not exact matches
Over the years, his children have filed lawsuits against each other over pieces of their late father's empire.
Researchers at the University of Toronto recently documented widespread workplace discrimination against fathers who participate in child - rearing — managers and co-workers were likely to label them slackers or «failed men.»
10:21 - 23; «Now brother will deliver up brother to death, and a father his child; and children will rise up against parents and cause them to be put to death.
And then there he was, born while I was leaning against our old truck, standing up, into my own hands, nearly 9 pounds of shrieking boy - child humanity, welcomed by my uncontrollable laughter and his father's uncontrollable relief - tears.
I was terrorized as a child — beaten by my father's belt and bludgeoned by scriptures that were twisted into weapons against my tiny spirit.
Against the angry censure of a scandalized populace, Cromwell defends the whims of his king, to whom he stands in a relationship similar to Bonhoeffer's child to his father, or Mantel to her mother: a relationship in which loyalty to a flawed caregiver takes precedence over loyalty to truth.
1 Corinthians 11:14 (Men should not have long hair) 1 Corinthians 14:34 - 35 (Women should remain silent in church) Deuteronomy 13:6 - 16 (Death penalty for Apostasy) Deuteronomy 20:10 - 14 (Attack city, kill all men, keep women, children as spoils of war) Deuteronomy 21:18 - 21 (Death penalty for a rebellious son) Deuteronomy 22:19 - 25 (Kill non - virgin / kill adulterers / rapists) Ecclesiastes 1:18 (Knowledge is bad) Exodus 21:1 - 7 (Rules for buying slaves) Exodus 35:2 (Death for working on the Sabbath) Ezekiel 9:5 - 6 (Murder women / children) Genesis 1:3,4,5,11,12,16 (God creates light, night and day, plants grow, before creating sun) Genesis 3:16 (Man shall rule over woman) Jeremiah 19:9 (Cannibalism) John 3:18 (He who believes in Jesus is saved, he that doesn't is condemned) John 5:46 - 47 (Jesus references Old Testament) Leviticus 3:1 - 17 (Procedure for animal sacrifice) Leviticus 19:19 (No mixed fabrics in clothing) Leviticus 19:27 (Don't trim hair or beard) Leviticus 19:28 (No tattoos) Leviticus 20:9 (Death for cursing father or mother) Leviticus 20:10 (Death for adultery) Leviticus 20:13 (Death for gay men) Leviticus 21:17 - 23 (Ugly people, lame, dwarfs, not welcome on altar) Leviticus 25:45 (Strangers can be bought as slaves) Luke 12:33 (Sell your possessions, and give to the poor) Luke 14:26 (You must hate your family and yourself to follow Jesus) Mark 10:11 - 12 (Leaving your spouse for another is adultery) Mark 10:21 - 22 (Sell your possessions and give to the poor) Mark 10:24 - 25 (Next to impossible for rich to get into heaven) Mark 16:15 - 16 (Those who hear the gospel and don't believe go to hell) Matthew 5:17 - 19 (Jesus says he has come to enforce the laws of the Old Testament) Matthew 6:5 - 6 (Pray in secret) Matthew 6:18 (Fast for Lent in secret) Matthew 9:12 (The healthy don't need a doctor, the sick do) Matthew 10:34 - 37 (Jesus comes with sword, turns families against each other, those that love family more than him are not worthy) Matthew 12:30 (If you're not with Jesus, you're against him) Matthew 15:4 (Death for not honouring your father and mother) Matthew 22:29 (Jesus references Old Testament) Matthew 24:37 (Jesus references Old Testament) Numbers 14:18 (Following generations blamed for the sins of previous ones) Psalms 137:9 (Violence against children) Revelation 6:13 (The stars fell to earth like figs) Revelation 21:8 (Unbelievers, among others, go to hell) 1 Timothy 2:11 - 12 (Women subordinate and must remain silent) 1 Timothy 5:8 (If you don't provide for your family, you are an infidel)
Some feminists hypothesize that if fathers shared the details of child rearing with mothers, sons would not need to rebel so strongly against their mothers, and a healthier transition would be possible.
They know about the anti-Jewish polemics of certain church fathers; about the forced baptisms, especially of children; about the church council decree that sanctioned the removal of such children from their parents; about a papal edict encouraging raids on Jewish synagogues by the faithful; about the expulsion of all Jews from a country like Spain; about Luther's hate language directed against Jews when they did not convert according to his timetable; about the prohibition against Jews living in Calvin's Geneva; and about all the cruelties Christians have felt justified in perpetrating against the people they called «Christ - killers.»
It could be to make the father the child of the son; it could be to make Whitehead the child of his rationalist successors, like Charles Hartshorne, rather than — properly, I believe — to make Whitehead the child of Bergson and James and Dewey, all his philosophical antecedents and all radical empiricists21 in revolt against one form of rationalism or another.
First of all it should be noted that one should never harm the consciences of children in going against Church teaching merely to obey the law: «Our fathers chained in prisons dark were still in heart and conscience free» and better to be thus than to be applauded by the Local Authority advisers and teach what is wrong.
In the Presbyterian Church (USA), one of our more recent confessions states that even though we rebel against God, God remains faithful, «like a mother who will not forsake her nursing child, like a father who runs to welcome the prodigal home.»
«Brother shall deliver up the brother to death, and the father the child: and the children shall rise up against their parents, and cause them to be put to death.»
In other words, even WHOLE FAMILIES will be divided about Him & who He is, setting father against mother, mother against her husband, & even children against their parents when it comes to what they believe about Him & His message!
21 «But brother will deliver his brother to death, and a father his son, and children will rise against their parents and will put them to death.»
What began as a reasonable enough reaction against the Victorian tendency to disbelieve the wife and deprive her of her children upon divorce, has transmogrified itself into the very reverse, where husbands and fathers, even those of otherwise good reputation and position, are assumed to be the villains of the piece.
Official indifference to fathers» identity goes directly against the principle of families and individuals taking responsibility for their children and sharing this responsibility together.
Either denial of registration is effective, so not using it on mothers and married fathers is against the interests of the child; or it is not effective, so applying it to unmarried fathers adds nothing to the safety of the child.
However, evidence that overall fathers can (and often do) «buffer» their children against the worst effects of their mothers» depression is found from a study that measured what happened when the fathers didn't provide support:
Secondly, if the father wants to register against the mother's wishes, the court, whilst it can not deny PR to any parent on child welfare grounds (as it currently prevented from doing so except for unmarried fathers), the court can use a Section 8 order to limit the exercise of PR by any parent on child welfare grounds.
The official indifference to the fathers identity goes directly against this government's agenda about families and individuals taking responsibility for their children and sharing this responsibility together.
Campaigners against this legal change are worried that the 7 % of fathers whose names are currently not on their children's birth certificates are the 5 - 6 % of fathers who use violence in their homes at this point in time — and that mothers have been, wisely, seeking to exclude them.
Boys who have been physically maltreated and neglected as children, as well as those who have been victims of physical or sexual assault, have been forced to have sexual contact against their will or have been victims of incest are vastly more likely to become fathers as teenagers than other teenage males (for review, see Kiselika, 2008, pp42 - 44)
• In separated families, high levels of non-resident father involvement protect against later mental health problems in children (Flouri, 2005a).
For example, high levels of father involvement protect against adult experience of homelessness in the sons of manual workers; and against later mental health problems in children in separated families; and fathers» active care of «difficult - to - raise» pre-schoolers is related to fewer problems in these children later (Flouri 2005).
For example, many lone mothers ring Parentline because their children have insufficient contact with their father, while many fathers ring because they feel mothers deny them contact or poison their children against them.
I've seen a mother go from a «turn a blind eye» enabler to someone who at least gives her children some kind of support once she divorced the father and took out a restraining order against him.
When the child gets slightly older, some mothers decide to explain in vague terms that the father committed some act of violence against her.
Its very sad, and its to the point women know this, and some use it against fathers who want to be there for their child or children.
The research confirms that a father's emotional engagement — not the amount of time fathers spend with children, rather how they interact with them — leads to multiple positive outcomes, and serves as a significant protective factor against high risk behaviors in both girls and boys.
Some moms in this predicament even wonder whether formally filing for child custody could work against them, causing an absent father to reappear «out of the woodwork» and demand joint custody or regular visitation.
If she doesn't file for child custody, for states that presume two parents who sign a birth certificate have custody of the child, an unwed mother may be left with little recourse against a father.
In other words, an emotionally close father - child relationship not only serves as a significant protective factor against high risk behaviors, but it is also a potential source of health for the entire family.
Dr Paul Ramchandani — a researcher and clinical psychiatrist now based at the Academic Unit of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Department of Medicine, Imperial College London — led the study, which assessed father - infant interactions in the family home when the child was aged three months and compared them against the child's behaviour at the age of twelve moChild and Adolescent Psychiatry, Department of Medicine, Imperial College London — led the study, which assessed father - infant interactions in the family home when the child was aged three months and compared them against the child's behaviour at the age of twelve mochild was aged three months and compared them against the child's behaviour at the age of twelve mochild's behaviour at the age of twelve months.
You may not realize it, but often fathers who stay at home with their children are discriminated against.
The principle that children under three should not stay overnight with their separated or divorced fathers, when parents can not agree on co-parenting arrangements, has recently reappeared as an argument against co-residential parenting for very young children.
Some advocates of greater fathers» rights have argued that fathers should have the right to «disclaim fatherhood» and refuse financial or legal responsibility for a child born against their wishes.
Parental alienation syndrome is often invoked when a father claims that a mother's angry comments about the father have «programmed» the child against him.
Haters of truth and sentimentalists will call for Oshekomes head, byt will foolishly turn blind eyes to the fact that he have outlaid a child who depends on the father or relative being the invigilator to pass exams will always fail the exam on the day his father or relation is not in the exams hall, that is the case of the EFCC and the FGN, they relied on the judiciary to help them rubbish their opposition or faces they do not like, and have always lost cases because their candidates in the judiciary were not assigned their cases and that is the same head of EFCC Magu that the president keep nominating for confirmation, even when reports indicted him, this recent looses have to confirm to doubting Thomas that Magu is just the best because he can do the dirty work for the APC and Buhari, not because he is the best in corruption fight, I wish there is a listening and discerning government in place back there in Nigeria, they would have known that there is a vacuum as far as EFCC is concerned and use the time to shop for a head that will deliver, it also confirms the fact that the «So called fight against corruption» Is a BIG lie and propaganda, just a wipe to flog opposition into their line, shame on the clapping members and the O yes members who will never hear any criticisms concerning Buhari or anything he does good or bad, bitter or sweet dem go swallow like that shaaaaa.