Sentences with phrase «child custody issues because»

Mediation can be one of the best ways to resolve divorce and child custody issues because it lets you make the decisions — not a judge.

Not exact matches

Some men are gathering around isolated issues, like child custody, and they are making changes; there are more custody battles than ever before because more men want more time with their kids after divorce.

Choosing a good child custody attorney can be difficult, particularly because of the many highly emotional issues that emerge during child custody proceedings.

Because legal decisions will be made jointly, parents who win joint legal custody need to discuss important issues affecting their child's well - being on a regular basis.

Breech Twins and higher order multiples Previous CS Pre-Eclampsia Placenta praevia Cervical incompetence Previous late stillbirth Previous premature birth Grand multiparty Age under 18 Age over 35 Smoking Drug use Severe mental health issue Epilepsy Type 1 diabetes Type 2 diabetes Gestational diabetes Asthma GBS positive Abnormal antibodies Transplant recipient Congenital heart disease Known foetal abnormality Immunosuppressive medication MS Physical disability Intellectual disability Hypothyroidism Hyperthyroidism Previous shoulder dystocia Previous 3rd or 4th degree tear Sickle Cell anaemia BMI under 18 or over 35 at conception Previous massive PPH APH in current pregnancy HIV / AIDS Hepatitis B or C Active TB IUGR Oligohydramnios Polyhydramnios Child previously removed from custody because of abuse Uterine abnormalities such as uterine septum or double uterus Previous uterine surgery for fibroids Chronic renal problems Hypertension Auto immune condition Previous stroke or blod clot Cancer Domestic violence or abusive home Prisoners Homeless women

(borrowed from Dr Kitty) Breech Twins and higher order multiples Previous CS Pre-Eclampsia Placenta praevia Cervical incompetence Previous late stillbirth Previous premature birth Grand multiparty Age under 18 Age over 35 Smoking Drug use Severe mental health issue Epilepsy Type 1 diabetes Type 2 diabetes Gestational diabetes Asthma GBS positive Abnormal antibodies Transplant recipient Congenital heart disease Known foetal abnormality Immunosuppressive medication MS Physical disability Intellectual disability Hypothyroidism Hyperthyroidism Previous shoulder dystocia Previous 3rd or 4th degree tear Sickle Cell anaemia BMI under 18 or over 35 at conception Previous massive PPH APH in current pregnancy HIV / AIDS Hepatitis B or C Active TB IUGR Oligohydramnios Polyhydramnios Child previously removed from custody because of abuse Uterine abnormalities such as uterine septum or double uterus Previous uterine surgery for fibroids Chronic renal problems Hypertension Auto immune condition Previous stroke or blod clot Cancer Domestic violence or abusive home Prisoners Homeless women

Especially around parenting issues — there are still child custody problems in states with progressive marijuana policies, because child custody laws can still be beholden to federal policy, and marijuana is a schedule I drug.

In such circumstances comity is violated because the issuing state might still believe its courts have an interest in protecting its residents in such child custody determinations.

Because no specific statutes are enumerating the factors a court must consider regarding school placement, the Arizona Court of Appeals defaulted to the factors a judge must consider when issuing an initial child custody order.

Differences in having children versus those families that do not have children are handled differently because the former will not require you to address child custody or child support issues whereas the latter would include these matters.

This is because such scenarios give rise the a legal issue of whether the circumstances and preferences of the parents should be allowed to dictate the child's living circumstances, whether such moves should be allowed and by whom, and — if so — what happens to the custody and access arrangements that are in place.

Because issues of family law and criminal defense often overlap here at Hallett Whipple Weyrens we routinely represent people accused of domestic assault, which frequently overlaps into Protection From Abuse, Divorce and Child Custody cases.

Although no federal laws specifically address custody, parental responsibility, visitation or time - sharing issues in military divorces, these issues are often made more challenging because service members» obligations to their jobs require extra flexibility and creativity in creating parenting plans and time - sharing arrangements that will work for both parents as well as serve the best interests of the children.

The imposition of the mandatory minimum sentence at issue in this case would have disproportionately negative consequences for women because of the nature of their involvement with the drug trade, this impact of incarceration on child custody and motherhood, and the likelihood that BC women will be jailed far from their home communities.

Because child custody orders are notoriously difficult to amend, our experienced lawyers anticipate issues that might arise and incorporate solutions in your original order.

West Coast LEAF will argue that the mandatory jail sentence at issue in this case has a disproportionate impact on women because of their role as primary caregivers and the potential for loss of child custody, and the likelihood that women will be jailed far from their home communities because of the lack of adequate facilities for incarcerated women in BC, among other issues.

The Court of Appeal confirmed increased deference is owed because determining custody issues and the best interests of a child is necessarily a fact - driven inquiry within the discretionary powers of the Trial Judge.

Unless you are in immediate danger, speaking with an attorney first can be a wise decision because leaving the marital home prior to the issuance of a court order could affect issues of spousal support, division of property and child custody.

Parents who divorce while their child is very young might be faced with a difficult custody issue if the child is breastfed, because it's impractical for breastfed children to be separated for long periods from their mother.

Many people who go through issues such as divorce or a child custody dispute become frustrated because their lawyer doesn't treat their legal concerns as seriously as they do.

When temporary custody is issued because a parent is sick, in jail or otherwise unable to care for the child, the temporary order may expire when the parent is again able to care for the child.

Many unmarried parents do not realize that child custody can become a very large issue in their lives because they associate custody disputes only with married couples ending marriages.

This can be somewhat confusing, because people will often get divorced before other issues, such as child custody and support, property division, and spousal support have been disposed of.

For instance, if there are children involved, making the decision to divorce can be much more complicated because there are many more issues to deal with such as parenting plans, custody arrangements, child support, and, of course, how the divorce will affect the children.

Because Florida child custody lawyers recognize the value of the amicable resolution of custody issues, they can help you navigate the emotional roadblocks that often derail the constructive negotiation of parenting plans when parties proceed without legal representation in custody cases.

Because my cases are often complex, be they financially complex or complex due to intricate issues involving parenting and child custody issues, I will be handling all aspects of your case and bringing to bear my years of experience.

Because issues like custody, prenuptial agreements, child support, spousal support or separation can be emotionally charged and tough to address, we coach you on how to navigate the constantly changing currents of family law.

Further, as respecting possible modification, because of past issues of the defendant failing to comply with orders of the court; providing token compliance with orders of the court while ignoring the spirit and intent of the orders (including the orders dated December 1, 2010); the defendant's lengthy pattern of contemptuous conduct; the expenses and financial waste caused by the defendant; the substantial financial drain on the resources of the plaintiff and the guardian ad litem caused by the defendant; the pattern of parental alienation; prior false reports of abuse and / or neglect to governmental entities; and the need for repose on the part of the minor child, it is anticipated that in addition to satisfaction of the foregoing conditions, no modification motion is permitted to be filed by defendant regarding the sole physical and / or sole legal custody arrangements, except in the case of the plaintiff's total and permanent disability as determined by the Social Security Administration, unless the following conditions are satisfied...» Eisenlohr v. Eisenlohr, 2011 WL 1566201 at * 4 (Conn.Super.).

Same - sex child custody cases can by complex, both because of adoption issues and because of prejudice and discrimination.

Family Courts and social workers dismiss parental alienation because they all too often view it as a child custody issue as opposed to a child protection issue.

The family court in Shawnee county, KS has some serious issues with reacting impulsively and approving sole custody by default because the other parent was not there... knowing they aren't dead, realizing that 2 notices were sent and returned with «not at this address» so parent was probably only absent because they never received word of this very important, life altering hearing - not because they felt they were above the law as indicated via court records then to seal the final decision, the judge shouldve reviewed any past files taking note of any past complaints / concerns to the court regarding alienating parent doing just that and automatically recommend a continuation and make clear that court was not to move forward until they get a hold of the absent parent and allow them their right to be there... because that would've been 100 % in the best interest of the child.

The court found that joint custody would be unworkable because of the following communication related issues: 1) the father had the tendency to bully the mother, 2) the father continued to denigrate the mother in the child's presence, and 3) the parents had incompatible approaches to communication.

This is because each party is given a voice, and spouses decide together how to divide assets and handle child custody issues.

While the best interest standard had been routinely applied to unwed parents, joint custody raises different issues because it is a policy that is tied conceptually to divorce and is intended to continue much of the unity attributed to marriage, vis - a-vis the children.