That is exactly what Rebecca Mozaffarian, project manager for the Harvard Prevention Research Center, set out to do in her work with YMCA afterschool programs around the country where they were charged with finding healthier snack and drink alternatives to fit within the 76 - cent per
child federal reimbursement for afterschool programs.
Not exact matches
As for their salaries, the «operation of the program» is funded through (a)
federal reimbursement, which is derived from taxpayer dollars and (b) cash payments from district parents who can afford to pay for all or a portion of their
children's meals.
There is an obvious disparity between the funds made available by the
federal government to support free meals for low - income students and the revenue collected by school districts (from
federal «paid» meal
reimbursements and student payments) to support the very same meals when served to
children at higher income levels.
They also would help ensure that
federal reimbursements for free and reduced price meals benefit low - income
children.
If the price charged for paid meals, combined with the
federal per - meal subsidy, covered the costs of these meals (or equaled the
federal per - meal
reimbursement for free meals), more funds could be put toward providing more nutritious meals, providing better compensation and professional support to food service staff, or other improvements that would benefit
children.
Whether or not Congress chooses to increase
reimbursements, the first step to providing resources for higher quality school meals is to ensure that
federal reimbursements for free and reduced price meals are used for their intended purpose — providing nutritious breakfasts and lunches to low - income school
children.
If all states met FRAC's goal of reaching 70 low - income
children at breakfast for every 100 at school lunch, an additional 3 million students would have access to a healthy breakfast, and schools would have access to an additional $ 836 million in
federal reimbursements.
Often, they use part of the
federal reimbursements for meals served to low - income
children.
Such changes also would help low - income
children obtain the full benefit of
federal reimbursements for free and reduced price meals.
As explained below, two possible uses of school food revenue — subsidizing paid meals and providing competitive foods — raise concerns that low - income
children may not be getting the full benefit of the
federal reimbursements intended for those meals.
The bill, a priority for the president and first lady Michelle Obama, would boost spending on
child nutrition $ 4.5 billion over 10 years and raise
federal reimbursements for school lunches more than the inflation rate for the first time since 1973.
It's in the school's best interest to make sure all
children who qualify for free meals apply for them: The more
children who are eligible for free meals, the higher the
reimbursements the school receives from the
federal government.
For
children coming from low - income households, the
federal reimbursement rate for lunch is around $ 3.33.
Accordingly, rather than force
children to take the whole meal and throw out much of it, in 1975, Congress passed an amendment to the School Lunch Act allowing high schools to still receive
federal reimbursement for meals so long as students selected at least three out of five options served, including milk.
In the meantime, while the pending
child nutrition legislation in Congress seeks to raise
federal reimbursement for school meals by a mere six cents — rather than the one dollar advocated by reformers like Chef Ann — we need to exploit every opportunity to bring more funds to schools.
This funding can come in the form of a state
reimbursement for free and reduced price meals paid on top of the
Federal reimbursement; for example, the state of California is supposed to give schools an extra.219 for every meal served to a qualifying low income
child (in fact, due to the ongoing budget crisis in California, that
reimbursement has not always been paid for every qualifying meal in recent years.)
Tables showing the per meal
federal reimbursement rates for the Afterschool Meal Program and Summer Food Service Program, as well as projected annual program income based on the number of
children served.
But the district's classified employees like bus drivers will lose a day's pay and
child nutrition will forfeit about $ 100,000 in
federal reimbursement for meals.
But in its recent reauthorization of
child nutrition programs, Congress» direction is that
federal reimbursement funds should really go for meals and delivering those meals,» she said.
The article notes a recent Supreme Court case, Board of Education v. Tom F. that let stand a decision permitting a wealthy parent to obtain
reimbursement for private school education under
federal law, even where the parent did not give the public school an opportunity to address the
child's needs and immediately places the
child in private school.
The domination of
federal child welfare services funding by worker training,
reimbursement of foster parents, case management for
children in foster care, and adoption subsidies (all entitlements under Title IV - E of the Social Security Act) leaves few resources to develop or implement high - quality parent education.
The bill restricts certain State claims for
Federal reimbursement of administrative costs under the
Federal foster care program; clarifies the use of Medicaid targeted case management services for
children in foster care; includes substantial cuts to programs; and reauthorizes TANF, adding new work requirements while providing almost no funding increase in
child care.
Strengthening Families and Communities: Creative Strategies for Financing Post-Adoption Services: A White Paper Casey Center for Effective
Child Welfare Practice (2003) Provides a framework for States to maximize Federal reimbursements for child welfare services by identifying State general funds that can be used to support a comprehensive mix of postadoption support, education, training, and therapeutic and treatment serv
Child Welfare Practice (2003) Provides a framework for States to maximize
Federal reimbursements for
child welfare services by identifying State general funds that can be used to support a comprehensive mix of postadoption support, education, training, and therapeutic and treatment serv
child welfare services by identifying State general funds that can be used to support a comprehensive mix of postadoption support, education, training, and therapeutic and treatment services.