Sorry, Christians don't know the eternal destiny of anyone and can not judge in that sense, but are called to speak of horrors committed by other, especially the killing
of children in the womb.
Several ultrasound scans were carried out previously, which suggested that after eight weeks of pregnancy the
unborn child in the womb tends to prefer moving its right of left hand, whereas in the thirteenth week, they prefer sucking either their left or right thumb.
There is an opportunity to build from such a basis and to turn away from the dreadful darkness of our culture (spiritually and humanly) which is killing
innocent children in the womb.
According to Stanford Children's Health, excess amounts of blood glucose can be passed on to a
developing child in the womb, and lead to higher insulin levels.
The government is to identify at
risk children in the womb, as part of a bid to tackle the «hardcore» vestiges of social exclusion.
Denying the divine origins of the human person, our government has withdrawn the law's protection from
unborn children in the womb» the most absolutely innocent and defenseless members of our human family.
I honestly think that men should stay out of this issue until they too are able to carry
a child in their wombs.
And, it may be legal to murder
a child in the womb, but it isn't moral.
Judging from your posts I take it you «ve killed
a child in the womb.
Or do you not consider
the child in the womb a folk?????
For as soon as I heard the sound of your greeting,
the child in my womb leaped for joy.
Tom Tom is a 50 year old women who is obviously proud of the fact she killed
a child in the womb.
At least
a child in the womb stops being a «parasite» after a time.
Everybody dies, saying God killed
the child in the womb is like saying he killed somebody with cancer.
Despite frequent opposition and persecution through the ages, she will not fail in the one thing necessary: «to bring forth
his children in her womb through Christ, to dedicate them as sons and daughters acceptable at the font and at the altar.»
That is the face of
a child in the womb.
But, they must refuse to host
a child in their womb.
No,
a child in the womb has done nothing wrong, but that doesn't make them sinless.
That it can be considered at all is owing to the attrition effected by decades of propaganda, in which
the child in the womb has been rendered abstract and pre-human.
On the contrary,
a child in the womb of a mother intent on killing it, is in the most unsafe place possible.
You advocate that we should have choices so why doesn't
the child in the womb have a choice?
«Who is so vulnerable as
the child in the womb?»
President Obama, however, believes just as strongly that the mother has the right to kill
the child in her womb....
In the case of abortion, the obstacles will often be overcome by factual information about the peaceful, compassionate work of pro-life groups, the damage done to women by abortion, the increasing information on the life of
the child in the womb.
There is today no rational disagreement that
the child in the womb is, from conception, a living being that is undeniably a human being.
If we are to condemn snipping the neck of a child delivered at, say, twenty - four or twenty - six weeks to kill him or her, how can we defend dismembering or poisoning
a child in the womb at twenty - six, thirty, or even thirty - four weeks?
Those who approve of our current abortion regime sometimes claim that
the child in the womb is simply an undifferentiated mass of tissue, an appendage to a woman's body.
This is especially true of the rights of the poor, sick and handicapped, and now indeed of
the child in the womb.
Given that the special grace rests on those who are incapable of making any choice towards righteousness or unrighteousness (and the unborn child certainly falls into this category), then
that child in the womb, should they die, will be taken to heaven.
lets get rid of
ALL children in the womb..
(Granted those who attended the march were of various faiths and denominations) The purpose of the March for Life is to stand up for
the children in the womb who have no voice and turning our culture of death into a culture of life.
Murdering
a child in the womb is no different.
One of the interesting aspects which seems to me especially important in the debate about abortion is the pre-natal learning of
the child in the womb as a subject of ongoing research.
Children in the womb, for legal purposes, will remain non-persons whose lives may be ended with impunity.
------------ No, what I have done is to use logic and reason to irrefutably prove that
the child in the womb is a human being.
But the brief for Texas showed how precise and deep our knowledge of
the child in the womb already was:
Buckley bore the gravest moral objections to abortion, and he expressed his deep incredulity with the decision: It seemed to betray, he thought, a flippant disregard for the facts known well to embryology about the development of
the child in the womb.
In the meantime, science marched on, confirming and reconfirming and reconfirming yet again the biological fact of the humanity of
the child in the womb.